Rehabilitative Efficacy of a Visual Feedback Device for Locomotion of Post-stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT04364490

Last Updated: 2020-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel body-weight support (BWS) gait training system with visual feedback, called Copernicus®. This computerized device provides highly comfortable, regular and repeatable locomotion in hemiplegic patients, training the ability to transfer weight loading alternately on both feet through visual real-time monitoring of gait parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gait disorders are very common in stroke patients (about 80%) increasing the risk of falls in performing daily activities and also reducing the global quality of life. Gait disorders in these patients are characterized by asymmetry in postural and weight distribution during quiet standing, as well as, by reduced gait speed, that is considered one of the most important outcome measure of locomotor recovery.

Restoring gait functions (speed, asymmetry and balance) after stroke is one of the major therapeutic goals in post-stroke rehabilitation and a plethora of recovering strategies have been proposed.

In this study we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel body-weight support (BWS) gait training system with visual feedback, called Copernicus®. This computerized device provides highly comfortable, regular and repeatable locomotion in hemiplegic patients, training the ability to transfer weight loading alternately on both feet through visual real-time monitoring of gait parameters Copernicus®, a sensory system for the early start of the locomotion appears as an elliptical cylinder of about 1 meter high on which two completely slideing positions are prepared by means if a guide fixed along the oval surface of the device. Each post has a support on which the patient's healthy side of the subject is placed, above which a brace for the support of the body is attached and weared by the patient in the verticalization; Front of the patient is a tablet that provides visual feedback during the exercises. The patient wears shoes on a pair of soles with piezo-resistive sensors that record for each foot the pressure exerted on the three areas of the foot (outer, inner and heel). The recorded data is then processed and transmitted to the tablet within a virtual reinforcement environment. The patient will be able to know his performance and achieved results and perceive them within a real scenario. The sensing pads measure the support times for each side and the number of changes. The device is so structured as to allow the simultaneous treatment of two patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After a stroke this ability may become worse or completely lost. It was demonstrated that hemiparetic patients with poor trunk function at admission stayed longer in a rehabilitation ward compared to patients who had better initial trunk function and could walk longer distances with speed at discharge. The reinforcement of trunk exercises in addition to conventional therapy seems to have a beneficial effect on erection station balance and locomotion in post-stroke patients. In the light of current knowledge, early verticalization and reinforcement of trunk exercises improve posture, balance and mobility. In this study, consecutive patients at first ischemic stroke (documented with TAC / RMN) will be evaluated. Patients in the study group will receive 60 minutes of conventional neuromotor rehabilitation treatment and 60 minutes of treatment with Copernicus®. The control group will receive 120 minutes of conventional neuro motor rehabilitation treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Physicians (carrying out the clinical baseline assessment \[T0\] and post-treatment investigation \[T1\]), as well as, the primary researcher and data entry assistants were all blinded to the group membership of the patients.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental VF group

Inpatients with a diagnosis of first-ever ischemic stroke in post acute phase, admitted for rehabilitation to S.Anna rehabilitation Institute.

The intervention consist of 2-h of rehabilitation daily sessions, five weekly over 6 weeks. During one hour of treatment, this group perform advanced gait training sessions by the computerized BWS system without visual feedback; during second hour of treatment, during the second hour of treatment patients are treated according to conventional therapy consisting of exercises for passive and active mobilization of lower limbs, trunk control, standing, deambulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Copernicus noVF

Intervention Type DEVICE

Advanced gait training sessions by the computerized BWS system, named Copernicus®, without visual feedback.

Experimental VF+ group

Inpatients with a diagnosis of first-ever ischemic stroke in post acute phase, admitted for rehabilitation to S.Anna rehabilitation Institute.

The intervention consist of 2-h of rehabilitation daily sessions, five weekly over 6 weeks. During one hour of treatment, this group perform the same advanced gait training session with the addition of visual feedback ensuring a real-time interactive control of locomotor performance; during second hour of treatment, during the second hour of treatment patients are treated according to conventional therapy consisting of exercises for passive and active mobilization of lower limbs, trunk control, standing, deambulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Copernicis VF-Plus

Intervention Type DEVICE

Advanced gait training session with the addition of visual feedback ensuring a real-time interactive control of locomotor performance.

Control group

Inpatients with a diagnosis of first-ever ischemic stroke in post acute phase, admitted for rehabilitation to S.Anna rehabilitation Institute.

The intervention consist of 2-h of rehabilitation daily sessions, five weekly over 6 weeks. During one hour of treatment, this group perform conventional therapy consisting of exercises for passive and active mobilization of lower limbs, trunk control, standing, deambulation; during second hour of treatment, during the second hour of treatment patients are treated according to conventional therapy consisting of exercises for passive and active mobilization of lower limbs, trunk control, standing, deambulation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control group

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual care

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Copernicus noVF

Advanced gait training sessions by the computerized BWS system, named Copernicus®, without visual feedback.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Copernicis VF-Plus

Advanced gait training session with the addition of visual feedback ensuring a real-time interactive control of locomotor performance.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control group

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* unilateral stroke in the territory of middle cerebral artery, occurring at least 1 month before entry;
* ability to follow verbal instructions without severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Evaluation, MMSE\> 24);
* right-handed patients
* signature of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* bilateral impairment;
* presence of complete hemiplegia;
* history of traumatic injury ( e.g. fracture, joint dislocation with permanent dysmorphism after trauma) impairing the lower limb motor function;
* botulinum toxin injections or other medication influencing the function of the lower limbs;
* history of major affective disorders or alcohol abuse or history and/or clinical evidence of severe heart, lung, kidney, or liver diseases;
* inability to provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

S.Anna Rehabilitation Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Loris Pignolo

Biomedical Engineer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paolo Tonin, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

S.Anna Rehabilitation Insitute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

S.Anna Institute

Crotone, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elsner B, Scholer A, Kon T, Mehrholz J. Walking with rhythmic auditory stimulation in chronic patients after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2020 Jan;25(1):e1800. doi: 10.1002/pri.1800. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31237045 (View on PubMed)

Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Kugler J, Elsner B. The Improvement of Walking Ability Following Stroke. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Sep 28;115(39):639-645. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0639.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30375325 (View on PubMed)

Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 17;8(8):CD002840. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28815562 (View on PubMed)

Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-Assisted Training for Walking After Stroke: A Major Update of the Evidence. Stroke. 2017 Jun 16:STROKEAHA.117.018018. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018018. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28626059 (View on PubMed)

Price R, Choy NL. Investigating the Relationship of the Functional Gait Assessment to Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait and Quality of Life in Individuals With Stroke. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Oct/Dec;42(4):256-264. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000173.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29324509 (View on PubMed)

Gianella MG, Gath CF, Bonamico L, Olmos LE, Russo MJ. Prediction of Gait without Physical Assistance after Inpatient Rehabilitation in Severe Subacute Stroke Subjects. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Nov;28(11):104367. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104367. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31519458 (View on PubMed)

Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, Iosa M, Molinari M, Tamburella F, Ramos A, Caria A, Solis-Escalante T, Brunner C, Rea M. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Dec 13;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22165907 (View on PubMed)

Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24505342 (View on PubMed)

Carozzo S, Serra S, Pignolo L, Tonin P, Cerasa A. The assessment of trunk recovery in stroke patients using 3D kinematic measures. Med Eng Phys. 2020 Apr;78:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32035812 (View on PubMed)

Pignolo L, Serra S, Basta G, Carozzo S, Arcuri F, Pignataro LM, Ciancarelli I, Tonin P, Cerasa A. Data on a new neurorehabilitation approach targeting functional recovery in stroke patients. Data Brief. 2019 Oct 28;27:104685. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104685. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31737755 (View on PubMed)

Cerasa A, Pignolo L, Gramigna V, Serra S, Olivadese G, Rocca F, Perrotta P, Dolce G, Quattrone A, Tonin P. Exoskeleton-Robot Assisted Therapy in Stroke Patients: A Lesion Mapping Study. Front Neuroinform. 2018 Jul 17;12:44. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00044. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30065642 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISA COP062017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.