Rehabilitation Based on Hybrid Neuroprosthesis

NCT ID: NCT07270484

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-12

Study Completion Date

2024-05-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a pilot, multi-center, prospective, and open study to test feasibility, functionality and usability of a device defined as a hybrid neuroprosthesis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ReHyb project, being oriented towards the development of a hybrid, modular, flexible and patient-specific upper-body hybrid neuro-prosthesis, potentially able to maximize the training efficacy during hospital stay as well as home-based rehabilitation or assistance during Activities of Daily Living (ADL), offering at the same time a pleasant user experience, has led to the development and integration of different modules in an attempt to adapt to the specific conditions of different patients. This goal has oriented the Consortium toward a participatory design (PD) and an ethics-by-design approach (EbD) that has been applied all along the execution of the project.

Under this perspective, two platforms have been developed and evaluated according to the following:

\- Evaluation of platforms: The global evaluation of the ReHyb system and its two developed platforms, High Power Platform (HPP) and Low Power Platform (LPP). To meet this goal, a pilot, multicenter, prospective, and open study was defined to test feasibility, functionality and usability of the two platforms that constitute the hybrid neuro-prosthesis developed. A total of 24 post-stroke patients (12 per clinical site) were recruited during a time-span of 12 months for the evaluation of the ReHyb system. This number was considered sufficient for the statistical analysis to investigate the feasibility and usability of the platforms. Furthermore, the sample size is expected to allow for finding most of the usability problems.

When evaluating the ReHyb platforms in full and in their different module combinations, the ReHyb project has incorporated two different hardware devices: a stationary high powered device (ReHyb-HP) and a portable spring-loaded device (ReHyb-SL), which are both integrated with FES support. The software components include the control algorithms of the platforms, a training environment (e.g., the Rehabilitations Gaming System (RGS), a desktop Virtual Reality (VR) setup with gamified protocols for motor and cognitive rehabilitation), and the Digital Twin (e.g., the level of task difficulty and the amount of support will be adapted to the capabilities of the user).

The general scope of the studies herein presented is about evaluating the developed ReHyb System regarding its feasibility, functionality and usability rather than about evaluating any therapeutic effect of using the device. As a consequence, with a maximum duration of 3 weeks and five sessions of training per subject, the study participation is probably not long enough to expect therapeutic effects induced by the hybrid training. In fact, in previous studies, a minimum of four to seven weeks of intervention was required to detect significant clinical improvements in upper limb functions.

The applied clinical investigation protocol (CIP) was the same for the two clinical rehabilitation centres namely: Schön Klinik (SK) and VALDUCE. Nevertheless, some minimal differences were registered between the two centres without major impact on the results obtained, but with interesting complementary information coming from some of the main stakeholders on the use of the new integrated devices. In particular, SK has included the evaluation made by healthcare operators and caregivers, who have been considered the closest stakeholders to patients involved in the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Stroke

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

post stroke Rehabilitation Robobotics Hybrid Exoskeleton

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

6 patients per platform in each clinical site were enrolled. This led to a total sample size of 24 patients. The 24 patients defined as the sample size was considered appropriate for feasibility evaluation since the system was composed by two different platforms related to the different needs patients may have according to their clinical conditions.
Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rehyb Device: High-Powered Platform

Patients with lower residual mobility were assigned to the High-Powered platform (ReHyb-HPP).

Patients assigned to ReHyb-HPP received upper limb mobilization, with active assistance, and Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ReHyb-HPP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Up to 7 sessions lasting approximately 60 minutes will be carried out, including dressing and undressing the exoskeleton and/or electrodes. At the end of the third and fifth training sessions, some questionnaires will be administered.

At the end of each training session, the patient's adherence to the selected platform configuration will be reassessed and modified as appropriate to ensure the subject's comfort and, at the same time, to evaluate the platform's adaptability to the subject's specific conditions.

Together with Functional electrical stimulation, patients received active assistance during predefined repetitive movements of the upper limb playing a single game.

ReHyb Device: Low-Powered Platform

Patients with higher residual mobility were assigned to the Low-Powered platform (ReHyb-LPP). Patients assigned to ReHyb-LPP received upper limb mobilization, with passive assistance, and Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ReHyb-LPP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Up to 7 sessions lasting approximately 60 minutes will be carried out, including dressing and undressing the exoskeleton and/or electrodes. At the end of the third and fifth training sessions, some questionnaires will be administered.

At the end of each training session, the patient's adherence to the selected platform configuration will be reassessed and modified as appropriate to ensure the subject's comfort and, at the same time, to evaluate the platform's adaptability to the subject's specific conditions.

Together with Functional electrical stimulation, patients received passive assistance only at the shoulder level, during unstructured movements of the upper limb playing games with adaptive difficulty.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ReHyb-HPP

Up to 7 sessions lasting approximately 60 minutes will be carried out, including dressing and undressing the exoskeleton and/or electrodes. At the end of the third and fifth training sessions, some questionnaires will be administered.

At the end of each training session, the patient's adherence to the selected platform configuration will be reassessed and modified as appropriate to ensure the subject's comfort and, at the same time, to evaluate the platform's adaptability to the subject's specific conditions.

Together with Functional electrical stimulation, patients received active assistance during predefined repetitive movements of the upper limb playing a single game.

Intervention Type DEVICE

ReHyb-LPP

Up to 7 sessions lasting approximately 60 minutes will be carried out, including dressing and undressing the exoskeleton and/or electrodes. At the end of the third and fifth training sessions, some questionnaires will be administered.

At the end of each training session, the patient's adherence to the selected platform configuration will be reassessed and modified as appropriate to ensure the subject's comfort and, at the same time, to evaluate the platform's adaptability to the subject's specific conditions.

Together with Functional electrical stimulation, patients received passive assistance only at the shoulder level, during unstructured movements of the upper limb playing games with adaptive difficulty.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (women or men aged ≥ 18 years)
* with a diagnosis of stroke either hemorrhagic or ischemic
* with a hemiparesis of the upper limb (0 ≤ MRC ≤ 4)
* in sub-acute (up to six months after acute event) or chronic condition (more than 6 months from the acute event).
* Able to sit upright for the duration of the test.
* Subjects with a level of cognitive capacity that enables him/her to follow the instructions related to the performance of exercises.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with a high level of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale: In general \>3 except for motorized joints which may be \>2)
* Pain in the affected upper limb (Numeric Rating Scale \> 4)
* Severe psychiatric disorder
* Permanent neurological symptoms present immediately before stroke
* Physical conditions that can alter normal biomechanics (e.g., recent sprains or injuries, etc.)
* Pregnant or nursing women
* No written informed consent from the patient or the legal representative
* Active implantable devices (e.g., pacemaker)
* Unstable medical condition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Össur Iceland ehf

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technical University of Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University, The Netherlands

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IUVO S.r.l.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tecnalia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Franco Molteni

Medical Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Franco Molteni, Medical Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

Klaus Jahn, Medical Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Schon Klinik Bad Aibling

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schon Klinik

Bad Aibling, , Germany

Site Status

Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

871767

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id