Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
420 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-16
2023-12-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Over-the-Counter Medication Usage
NCT00439348
Quantifying the Attentive Behaviors of Older Adults During Over-the-counter Drug Selection
NCT02188134
Tailored Medication Management Intervention
NCT04717297
Pharmaceutical Care and Clinical Outcomes for the Elderly Taking Potentially Inappropriate Medication
NCT00844025
Effect of Systematic Medication Review in Elderly Patients Admitted to an Orthopedic Department
NCT00738816
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study 1 - Survey of Pharmacists - Overseen by University of Wisconsin - Online Survey of pharmacists to evaluate which aspects in a drug facts labels are most critical to the reduction of adverse drug events.
Experiment 2 - Change Detection- Computer screen flashes between a label and the same label which has been modify slightly. Participant is instructed to locate the change as quickly as possible. Change should be detected more quickly for labels that engage users in bottom-up processing.
Experiment 3A- Absolute Judgement- Participant is asked a yes/no question about whether a product being displayed on a computer monitor is appropriate given a scenario. Half the scenarios involve active ingredient and half warning information. Time accuracy will indicate which labels are most effective.
Experiment 3B-Cross Product Comparison-Participant is given a scenario (that requires active ingredient or warning information) and is asked to select the appropriate OTC from a set of options(both products presented in identical labeling format within a trial). Again, speed an accuracy will be used to evaluate the most effective label designs.
Experiment 4- Judging Product Appropriateness- Participants judge whether a drug is appropriate for them based on their health and current medications. Information content varies across trials to determine how much information is required to make an informed decision. Response accuracy (relative to expert pharmacists from the University of Wisconsin's evaluation) as a function of the information presented will be used to determine information that is critical to make a correct decision and how well do the participants get that information from the standard principle display panel (PDP- the front panel) and the Drug Facts Label.
Experiment 5 - Eye tracking during appropriateness judgments - Participants evaluate whether an OTC medication is appropriate for their use, given their current health status and medication intake. Label formats will include current standards and an optimized label (derived from earlier experiments). Appropriateness judgments will be evaluated by pharmacists at University of Wisconsin, and the participant's eye movements will be monitored as they inspect the drugs. Comparisons across drug label formats will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate whether the optimized format more effectively garners attention and improves decision making.
Experiment 6 - Will be a replication of Experiment 5's methods but will use commercial brands rather than the mock brands in Experiment 5. This will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate the extent to which the effects found in Experiment 5 generalize to commercial brands about which participants may have prior familiarity and which contain branding information.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Condition 1 - Control
We note that our within subjects experimental design, in which each subject receives all treatments, is not well suited to this system of reporting. Thus we are defining "arms" as the label treatments we are evaluating. This label is the control label treatment which represents the current, legally required over-the-counter labeling standard.
No interventions assigned to this group
Condition 2 - Highlighted
This condition will involve a novel method of presenting critical active ingredient, drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information with highlighting.
Over the counter drug labels
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Condition 3 - FOP warning label
This condition will involve presenting critical drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information in a novel Front-of-Pack (FOP) warning label.
Over the counter drug labels
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Condition 4- FOP+Highlighting label
This condition will combine both the highlighting and FOP labeling interventions from conditions 2 and 3. Note: Across the four arms we are essentially doing a 2 (highlighting/no highlighting) by 2 (front of pack warning/ no front of pack warning) within subjects design.
Over the counter drug labels
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Over the counter drug labels
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* participant must be legally sighted
* participant must be able purchase and administer their own medications
* participant must be able to perform consent without assistance.
Exclusion Criteria
* if the participant has impaired memory
65 Years
110 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Michigan State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mark Becker
Professor Department of Psychology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark W Becker, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michigan State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Becker MW, Kashy DA, Harben A, Venkatesan K, Rodriguez A, Kebede M, Martin B, Breslow R, Bix L. A novel strategy to optimize critical information on over the counter labels for older adults. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 25;6(1):e1062. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1062. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Martin BA, Breslow RM, Sims A, Harben AL, Bix L, Becker MW. Identifying over-the-counter information to prioritize for the purpose of reducing adverse drug reactions in older adults: A national survey of pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):167-175.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
Harben AL, Kashy DA, Esfahanian S, Liu L, Bix L, Becker MW. Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 26;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00307-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00000832
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.