Over-the-counter (OTC) Labels for Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT04345731

Last Updated: 2024-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-16

Study Completion Date

2023-12-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Optimizing OTC labels for older adults: Empirical evaluation of labels designed to provide older users the information they need to to minimize adverse drug events

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overarching goal is to design and evaluate a novel front of pack label for OTC drugs that will reduce the prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in older adults. To do so the researchers will survey pharmacists to ascertain which label information is most important to the reduction of ADRs, and then will design novel OTC labels which highlight this information. To evaluate the effectiveness of these designs, the investigators propose five experiments where older adults will make judgments about OTC appropriateness.

Study 1 - Survey of Pharmacists - Overseen by University of Wisconsin - Online Survey of pharmacists to evaluate which aspects in a drug facts labels are most critical to the reduction of adverse drug events.

Experiment 2 - Change Detection- Computer screen flashes between a label and the same label which has been modify slightly. Participant is instructed to locate the change as quickly as possible. Change should be detected more quickly for labels that engage users in bottom-up processing.

Experiment 3A- Absolute Judgement- Participant is asked a yes/no question about whether a product being displayed on a computer monitor is appropriate given a scenario. Half the scenarios involve active ingredient and half warning information. Time accuracy will indicate which labels are most effective.

Experiment 3B-Cross Product Comparison-Participant is given a scenario (that requires active ingredient or warning information) and is asked to select the appropriate OTC from a set of options(both products presented in identical labeling format within a trial). Again, speed an accuracy will be used to evaluate the most effective label designs.

Experiment 4- Judging Product Appropriateness- Participants judge whether a drug is appropriate for them based on their health and current medications. Information content varies across trials to determine how much information is required to make an informed decision. Response accuracy (relative to expert pharmacists from the University of Wisconsin's evaluation) as a function of the information presented will be used to determine information that is critical to make a correct decision and how well do the participants get that information from the standard principle display panel (PDP- the front panel) and the Drug Facts Label.

Experiment 5 - Eye tracking during appropriateness judgments - Participants evaluate whether an OTC medication is appropriate for their use, given their current health status and medication intake. Label formats will include current standards and an optimized label (derived from earlier experiments). Appropriateness judgments will be evaluated by pharmacists at University of Wisconsin, and the participant's eye movements will be monitored as they inspect the drugs. Comparisons across drug label formats will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate whether the optimized format more effectively garners attention and improves decision making.

Experiment 6 - Will be a replication of Experiment 5's methods but will use commercial brands rather than the mock brands in Experiment 5. This will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate the extent to which the effects found in Experiment 5 generalize to commercial brands about which participants may have prior familiarity and which contain branding information.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Drug Event

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Several different studies within one large study to explore the use of over the counter medical labels and reducing adverse side effects. Each study is a repeated subjects design, with each participant receiving all label treatments to allow a within subjects analysis of label effectiveness.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Condition 1 - Control

We note that our within subjects experimental design, in which each subject receives all treatments, is not well suited to this system of reporting. Thus we are defining "arms" as the label treatments we are evaluating. This label is the control label treatment which represents the current, legally required over-the-counter labeling standard.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Condition 2 - Highlighted

This condition will involve a novel method of presenting critical active ingredient, drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information with highlighting.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Over the counter drug labels

Intervention Type OTHER

A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer

Condition 3 - FOP warning label

This condition will involve presenting critical drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information in a novel Front-of-Pack (FOP) warning label.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Over the counter drug labels

Intervention Type OTHER

A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer

Condition 4- FOP+Highlighting label

This condition will combine both the highlighting and FOP labeling interventions from conditions 2 and 3. Note: Across the four arms we are essentially doing a 2 (highlighting/no highlighting) by 2 (front of pack warning/ no front of pack warning) within subjects design.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Over the counter drug labels

Intervention Type OTHER

A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Over the counter drug labels

A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OTC drug label

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* participant must be 65+
* participant must be legally sighted
* participant must be able purchase and administer their own medications
* participant must be able to perform consent without assistance.

Exclusion Criteria

* if the participant has history of seizures
* if the participant has impaired memory
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Michigan State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Becker

Professor Department of Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark W Becker, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Michigan State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Becker MW, Kashy DA, Harben A, Venkatesan K, Rodriguez A, Kebede M, Martin B, Breslow R, Bix L. A novel strategy to optimize critical information on over the counter labels for older adults. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 25;6(1):e1062. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1062. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36712813 (View on PubMed)

Martin BA, Breslow RM, Sims A, Harben AL, Bix L, Becker MW. Identifying over-the-counter information to prioritize for the purpose of reducing adverse drug reactions in older adults: A national survey of pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):167-175.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34503908 (View on PubMed)

Harben AL, Kashy DA, Esfahanian S, Liu L, Bix L, Becker MW. Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 26;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00307-z.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34041617 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00000832

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Use and Opinions of Care Home Medicines Audit Tools
NCT05133700 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Medication Use and Quality of Life Among Older People
NCT05123313 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Polypharmacy Outpatient Clinic
NCT03911934 COMPLETED NA
Older Adults' Attitudes Towards Stopping Aspirin
NCT07305376 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA