Efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) Block Compared to Ultrasound-guided TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.

NCT ID: NCT04345341

Last Updated: 2023-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We propose a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane (LA-TAP) performed intraoperatively compared with usual postoperative analgesia without LA-TAP block. We hypothesise that there will be a decrease in postoperative opioid utilization and in pain scores for patients randomized to receive the LA-TAP block verses those who do not. We expect that patients will opt to take less break through opioid medication in the LA-TAP block group versus the no TAP block group.

Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes:

Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 \& 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 \& 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes:

Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 \& 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 \& 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction?

Patients will be randomized in two arms , LA-TAP , NO-TAP block . Each patient would fill out the pain score sheet and number of narcotic medications she used in first 24h, 48h and 72 h post operatively .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

the Efficacy of Analgesia of Laparoscopic TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgeries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic assisted TAP block

Laparoscopic assisted TAP block will be done by surgeon intra-operatively

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

injecting the mixture of bupivacaine with liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane to block the somatic nerves

no TAP block

no TAP block would be done

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine

injecting the mixture of bupivacaine with liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane to block the somatic nerves

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 18 years old and above
* English speaking
* patients with capacity to consent
* Elective laparoscopic and robotic benign genecology cases
* Elective laparoscopy/ robotic hysterectomy
* Elective laparoscopy/robotic myomectomy
* ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol applied

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* patients with positive urine pregnancy test in pre operative
* emergency procedures
* Procedure requiring staging or debulking
* surgeries that convert to laparotomy
* patients with allergy to local/systemic anaesthesia or analgesia
* Inability to undergo normal anesthesia induction process
* ASA III or higher
* history of pain relief medication dependence
* history of substance abuse
* end stage chronic kidney disease
* advanced liver disease
* history of chronic pain
* history of taking opioids or neuropathic agents regularly prior to surgery
* BMI of 50 or over
* skin infections at the site of TAP block injection or port sites.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farinaz Seifi, MD, FACOG

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

No NIH funding

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2000026422

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ssTAP vs TAP Catheters in TAH
NCT02525900 TERMINATED PHASE3