Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the TAP block, as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, even at a lower concentration, would provide effective analgesia in the first 24 h after hysterectomy, in comparison to a higher concentration of 0.4% ropivacaine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01074229
The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures
NCT04172272
Laparascopic TAP and Hysterectomy Trial #2
NCT03711981
Transversus Abdominal Plane Block at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Effect on Quality of Recovery
NCT01479270
TAP vs Surgical Infiltration of Local Anesthetic in Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT02519023
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary outcome measure in this study was 24 h morphine consumption. Secondary outcome measures included time to first request for morphine, VAS scores, and side effects associated with morphine consumption which include nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, as well as patient satisfaction.
Our study hypothesis is that TAP block performed with 0.2% ropivacaine 40ml is not inferior to that using 0.4% ropivacaine 40ml, in terms of analgesia in the first 24h.
Primary Objectives Morphine consumption in the first 24h should not differ between the 2 groups by more than 10mg.
Secondary Objectives Secondary objectives are to show that morphine side effects are similar in the two groups if a lower ropivacaine provides similar pain relief as higher concentration. Patient satisfaction is also recorded.
54 patients undergoing hysterectomy will be recruited from SGH.
Criteria for Recruitment and Recruitment Process Patients will be shortlisted from the surgical list the week prior to surgery. Patients seen in the pre anaesthetic assessment clinic will also be invited to take part in the study. A simple history and physical assessment will determine eligibility. Patients fitting the inclusion criteria will be approached for the study with the emphasis that participation is voluntary and refusal to participate will not affect subsequent conduct of anaesthesia or care. Patient's wishes will be respected should she request not to participate
STUDY DESIGN Double blind randomise control trial. Study design is non-inferiority trial testing 0.2% ropivacaine vs 0.4% ropivacaine. Expected 1 year to complete recruitment of 54 patients. All patients are expected to participate in the study for a period of 24h and will be followup during their convalescence in the hospital. There will be no change in scheduling of operation or additional visits for the purpose of the study.
Ultrasound images of the block may be stored in the thumb drive. However, the images will not be linked to patient identifiers. It will be stored in password protected thumb drive and kept in the department under lock and key.
It may be used for illustration if the research is published in a scientific journal.
Randomisation and Blinding Patients will be randomised into of the 2 groups - 0.2% or 0.4% ropivacaine group. The allocation sequence will be generated by a random number table, and group allocation will be concealed in sealed, opaque envelopes, which will not be opened until just prior to block performance.
The anaesthesiologist performing the block and anaesthesia will not be blinded. However, the patient, surgeon and researcher collecting subsequent patient data will be blinded.
Randomisation code will be broken after the final analysis of the study results. As both study groups involve the use of ropivacaine at concentration below the maximum recommended dose, the likelihood of needing to break the randomisation code is low. However, should that become necessary, the study PI can break the code.
Study Visits and Procedures Study visit 1: recruitment during pre-anaesthesia visit a day before surgery Procedure: Bilateral TAP block after surgery, before reversal of anaesthesia. Followup for 24h, which includes 1 study visit to elicit pain scores and side effects of opioids.
Screening Visits and Procedures History and physical examination are required to evaluate recruitment criteria. Patients will be invited to participate in the study after meeting inclusion criteria.
Study Visits and Procedures
1 visit in the post operative period.
Final Study Visit:
Patient will be seen once after operation in the first post operative day to assess for VAS scores, and side effects associated with morphine consumption which include nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, as well as patient satisfaction.
Post Study Follow up and Procedures Patient will be seen once after operation in the first post operative day to assess for VAS scores, and side effects associated with morphine consumption which include nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, as well as patient satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAP BLOCK 0.2% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised into this group will receive bilateral TAP block (single shot) with 0.2% ropivacaine after hysterectomy.
Intervention: TAP block Dose: 20 ml 0.2% ropivacaine
TAP BLOCK 0.2% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.2% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
TAP BLOCK 0.4% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.4% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
TAP BLOCK 0.4% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised into this group will receive bilateral TAP block (single shot) with 0.4% ropivacaine after hysterectomy.
Intervention: TAP block Dose: 20 ml 0.4% ropivacaine
TAP BLOCK 0.2% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.2% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
TAP BLOCK 0.4% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.4% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TAP BLOCK 0.2% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.2% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
TAP BLOCK 0.4% ROPIVACAINE
Patients randomised to this group will receive 20 ml 0.4% Ropivacaine for bilateral TAP block after hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 21-60
* undergoing open hysterectomy as planned by the surgeons
* able to provide informed consent. A upper limit age of 60 is chosen because elderly patients may have reduced requirements for analgesia and may be more sensitive to effects of opioids.
Exclusion Criteria
* allergy to study drugs
* BMI\>35
* Weight \<50
21 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
thong sze ying
ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/729/D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.