Endoscopy-related Phone Consultation During the COVID-19 Outbreak
NCT ID: NCT04344964
Last Updated: 2020-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
186 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-04-15
2020-07-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Enhanced Interactive Text Messages and Phone Instruction on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.
NCT04898426
Impact of Telephone Call on Bowel Preparation Quality in Colonoscopies
NCT04644939
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists Toward PPE in COVID-19 Era
NCT04479345
Impact of Digital Tools on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT05734079
Telephone Educational Intervention by the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nurse. Global Impact on the Quality of Colonoscopy
NCT03458377
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be invited to participate only after the consultation have been finalised and all questions regarding the endoscopic procedure to be done/that was done have been clarified. Patients and consultants will fill questionnaires to evaluate the phone consultation.
The primary outcome will the the comparison of "failed to attend" (FTA) occurrences compared to a similar period of the past year. Secondary outcomes will be patients' and consultants' satisfaction with the phone consultation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phone consult group
Information collected prospectively on FTA patients and questionnaire (satisfaction)
None - NA
Observational study
Face-to-face consult group
Information collected retrospectively on FTA patients
None - NA
Observational study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
None - NA
Observational study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consultation determined to be held over the phone as per preventive measures due to the COVID-19 outbreak
* Age \> 18 years
* Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient that is deemed as confused/not able to understand
* Unwilling/unable to participate in the post-consultation survey
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Austin Health
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu
Endoscopy Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sujievvan Chandran, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Consultant Gastroenterologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Austin Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barsom EZ, Jansen M, Tanis PJ, van de Ven AWH, Blusse van Oud-Alblas M, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Schijven MP. Video consultation during follow up care: effect on quality of care and patient- and provider attitude in patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1278-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07499-3. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
van Galen LS, Car J. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2018 Mar 29;360:k1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1047. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38839
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.