Infant and Parent Shared Book Reading

NCT ID: NCT04337372

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-08

Study Completion Date

2023-12-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This work is guided by two specific aims and is expected to result in a better understanding of the effectiveness of shared book reading as a tool for supporting parent-infant interactions and infant learning across the first year of life. This work determined the extent to which books with individually-named characters (e.g., "Boris", "Fiona") increases parent-infant joint attention and infant selective attention relative to books with generic labels (e.g., "Bear", "Bear") or no labels and whether attention differs by age. During infant-parent shared book reading joint attention was measured using dual eye-tracking. Infants and parents then returned to the lab the next day and infant selective attention and infant-parent neural synchrony was measured using EEG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Shared book reading has been found to have broad developmental benefits for language, socio-emotional and cognitive development. However, the effects of shared book reading on infant development are not well understood. Although healthcare professionals and educators ask parents to read books to their infants early and often, the book reading experience itself has never been systematically investigated in infancy. This work is guided by two specific aims and is expected to result in a better understanding of the effectiveness of shared book reading as a tool for supporting parent-infant interactions and infant learning across the first year of life. The primary aim of the proposed work is to determine the extent to which books with individually-named characters (e.g., "Boris", "Fiona") increases parent-infant joint attention and infant selective attention relative to books with generic labels (e.g., "Bear", "Bear") or no labels and whether attention differs by age. To address the aim of this project, a cross-sectional sample of 6-, 9-, and 12-month old infants and their parents came to the laboratory and read a book that includes three distinct character labeling conditions (individual names, generic category labels, no label). During infant-parent shared book reading joint attention was measured using dual eye-tracking. Infants and parents then returned to the lab the next day and infant selective attention and infant-parent neural synchrony was measured using EEG frequency tagging while infants and their parent viewed familiar characters across labeling conditions as well as unfamiliar characters. This project determined the extent to which parent-infant shared book reading impacted infant attention, parent-infant joint attention, EEG power, and parent-infant EEG synchrony.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Individual, Category, and No-label Conditions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

There were three age groups tested, but all infant-parent dyads were tested on the same conditions and measures.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

6 month olds

6-month old infants and a parent completed shared book reading and infant visual attention, joint visual attention (dyad, co-occurrence of parent and infant attention toward the book), infant EEG power, and infant-parent EEG coherence were measured in for objects labeled with individual level names, category-level names, and no label. All infant-parent dyads completed all three conditions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Effects of shared book reading: Labels

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.

9 month olds

9-month old infants and a parent completed shared book reading and infant visual attention, joint visual attention (dyad, co-occurrence of parent and infant attention toward the book), infant EEG power, and infant-parent EEG coherence were measured in for objects labeled with individual level names, category-level names, and no label. All infant-parent dyads completed all three conditions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Effects of shared book reading: Labels

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.

12 month olds

12-month old infants and a parent completed shared book reading and infant visual attention, joint visual attention (dyad, co-occurrence of parent and infant attention toward the book), infant EEG power, and infant-parent EEG coherence were measured in for objects labeled with individual level names, category-level names, and no label. All infant-parent dyads completed all three conditions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Effects of shared book reading: Labels

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.

Adult Parents

Adult parents of infant participants completed shared book reading with their infants. Joint attention and EEG synchrony data were recorded and combined with infant data for analyses. No adult data were analyzed separately from infant data.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Effects of shared book reading: Labels

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Effects of shared book reading: Labels

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants will be included if they are typically developing and between 5.5 and 12.5 months of age, as well as their caregiver.
* Parents 18-65 years old

Exclusion Criteria

1. Infants who were born more that 14 days premature.
2. Infants who with a history of neurological or visual deficits.
3. Infants with a history of seizures or a disorder that includes risk of seizures.
4. Infants with a parent that has a history of seizures of a disorder that includes risk of seizures.
5. Parents with a history of seizures or a disorder that includes risk of seizures.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Scott

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Andreas Keil, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida Brain, Cognition and Development Laboratory

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21HD102715-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

5R21HD102715-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB202000756-N

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Executive Function in Early Childhood
NCT03713125 RECRUITING NA
Hands and Hearts Together
NCT05834907 RECRUITING NA