Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin With or Without Durvalumab in Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04308174

Last Updated: 2025-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-20

Study Completion Date

2025-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Considering that the poor prognosis of resected biliary tract cancer and negative impact on the survival outcomes of R1/R2 resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve R0 resection rates and the survival outcomes of patients with resectable biliary tract cancer. The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve the R0 resection rates compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with localized biliary tract cancer. In this phase 2 trial, a total of 45 patients with localized biliary tract cancer will be 2:1 randomized to durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin or gemcitabine/cisplatin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Tract Neoplasms Gallbladder Cancer Cholangiocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Durvalumab + Gem/Cis

\<Investigational arm: preoperative phase (up to 4 cycles)\> Durvalumab 1,500 mg IV on Day 1, every 3 weeks (preop period) 1,500 mg IV Day 1, every 4 weeks (postop period) Gemcitabine 1,000 mg IV on Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks Cisplatin 25 mg IV on Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks

\<Postoperative therapy for all patients (up to 6 cycles)\> Durvalumab 1,500 mg IV Day 1, every 4 weeks (postop period)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Durvalumab + Gem/Cis

Intervention Type DRUG

Neoadjuvant Durvalumab + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin

Gem/Cis

\<Control arm: preoperative phase (up to 4 cycles)\> Gemcitabine 1,000 mg IV on Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks Cisplatin 25 mg IV on Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks

\<Postoperative therapy for all patients (up to 6 cycles)\> Durvalumab 1,500 mg IV Day 1, every 4 weeks (postop period)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gem/Cis

Intervention Type DRUG

Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine/Cisplatin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Durvalumab + Gem/Cis

Neoadjuvant Durvalumab + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gem/Cis

Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine/Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
* Age \> 19 years at time of study entry
* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of biliary tract (intrahepatic, hilar or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder carcinoma).
* Localized, potentially resectable, non-metastatic disease (determined at the discretion of attending surgeons) based on the results of CT, MRI or PET-CT scans.
* No active uncontrolled infection, except chronic viral hepatitis under antiviral therapy.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
* Body weight \>30kg
* Adequate normal organ and marrow function
* Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations including follow up.
* No other malignant disease apart from non-melanotic skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix, localized prostate or papillary thyroid cancer, or any other cancer where treated with curative intent \> 5 years previously without evidence of relapse

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol or a history of non-compliance
* Obstruction of gastrointestinal tract
* Active gastrointestinal bleeding
* Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study medication, and other clinically significant heart disease (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled hypertension)
* Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which would jeopardise compliance with the protocol
* Combined hepatocellular carcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma is excluded.
* History of allogenic organ transplantation.
* History of another primary malignancy except for

1. Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease ≥5 years before the first dose of IP and of low potential risk for recurrence
2. Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease
3. Adequately treated carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
* Mean QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) ≥470 ms calculated from 3 ECGs (within 15 minutes at 5 minutes apart).
* Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding or male or female patients of reproductive potential who are not willing to employ effective birth control from screening to 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab monotherapy.
* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or any of the study drug excipients.
* Judgment by the investigator that the patient is unsuitable to participate in the study and the patient is unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions and requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Asan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Changhoon Yoo

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Changhoon Yoo, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asan Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20375404 (View on PubMed)

Kang J, Jeong JH, Hwang HS, Lee SS, Park DH, Oh DW, Song TJ, Kim KH, Hwang S, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Park JH, Hong SM, Kim KP, Ryoo BY, Yoo C. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Patients with Refractory Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Tumor Proportion Score as a Potential Biomarker for Response. Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):594-603. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.493. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32019287 (View on PubMed)

Valle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA, Huguet F, Gruenberger T, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v28-v37. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw324. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27664259 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESR-18-14059

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer
NCT06214572 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3