Study of GEMOX(Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin) Versus XELOX(Xeloda/Oxaliplatin) in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT01470443
Last Updated: 2019-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-28
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
XELOX in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma After Failure of Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy
NCT02350686
Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) With or Without Erlotinib (Tarceva) in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
NCT01149122
A Randomized Study of GEMOX With or Without Cetuximab in Locally Advanced and Metastatic BTC
NCT01267344
EXIBIT: Oxaliplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT00174564
Cetuximab + Gemox in Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT01216345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Meanwhile, oxaliplatin (l-OHP), an alkylating diaminocyclohexane platinum derivate, has been noted to display a marked cytotoxic synergism in combination with fluoropyrimidines against a variety of solid human tumour cells \[11\]. Based on these information, Nehls et al. \[12\] conducted a prospective phase II study of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/folinic acid in biliary system adenocarcinomas, and the disease control rate (responses and stable disease (SD)) was 56%, and the median OS was 9.5 months. To improve efficacy and to offer a more convenient treatment option for patients by reducing clinical visits and avoiding indwelling devices, they prospectively investigated the activity and toxicity profile of three-weekly intravenous oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine (XELOX), and concluded that the XELOX regimen was a well-tolerated and active treatment option for advanced BTC \[13\].
Given a lack of prospective, direct, comparison between XELOX and GEMOX regimens in advanced BTC, we propose a randomized phase III trial of GEMOX (gemcitabine/oxaliplatin) vs XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) in metastatic or unresectable BTC patients.
With the assumption of a median 6-month PFS rate of 50% in the GEMOX arm and 35% in the XELOX arm (non-inferiority margin, 15%), a total of 103 patients were required under a two-sided 5% significance level and 80% power, with an accrual of 59 months and a follow-up of 6 months after the last patient registry, to show the non-inferiority of XELOX to GEMOX. An exponential distribution of time to progression was assumed. Allowing a dropout rate of 10%, we aimed to enroll 230 patients. An interim analysis was not planned.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GEMOX
* Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/㎡, day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks
* Oxaliplatin 100 mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 100 mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
XELOX
Xeloda, 1000mg/㎡ bid, day 1-15, every 3 weeks Oxaliplatin 130mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 100 mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of biliary tract (intrahepatic, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer.however, ampulla of vater cancer is excluded)
3. unresectable or metastatic
4. ECOG performance status of 0\~2
5. measurable or evaluable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria
6. Life expectancy≥12weeks
7. Adequate marrow, hepatic, renal and cardiac functions Serum aspartate transaminase and serum alanine transaminase≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), or AST and ALT ≤ 5 x ULN if liver function abnormalities are due to underlying malignancy Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN Absolute neutrophil count(ANC) ≥ 1,500/uL Platelets ≥ 100,0000/uL Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
8. chemotherapy naïve patient: prior adjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy is allowed if the last date of drug administration is \> 6 months from the study entry date
9. provision of a signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. ampulla of vater cancer is excluded
3. pregnant or lactating women
4. Active CNS metastases not controllable with radiotherapy or corticosteroids (however,CNS metastases(except for leptomeningeal seeding) are allowed if controlled by gamma knife surgery or surgery or radiotherapy or steroid)
5. known history of hypersensitivity to study drugs
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ho Yeong Lim
Professor of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsung medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen R, Zhang Y, Lin K, Huang D, You M, Lai Y, Wang J, Hu Y, Li N. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 22;13:871262. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.871262. eCollection 2022.
Kim ST, Kang JH, Lee J, Lee HW, Oh SY, Jang JS, Lee MA, Sohn BS, Yoon SY, Choi HJ, Hong JH, Kim MJ, Kim S, Park YS, Park JO, Lim HY. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):788-795. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz058.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-05-070
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.