Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy or Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Nonmetastatic Biliary Tract Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00304135
Last Updated: 2016-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-10-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiation therapy to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in treating patients with nonmetastatic biliary tract cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Oxaliplatin or Observation in Treating Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer That Has Been Removed by Surgery
NCT01313377
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without CPI-613 as First Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer (BilT-04)
NCT04203160
Oxaliplatin, Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer or Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT00266097
Gemcitabine + Oxaliplatin +Nab-paclitaxel in Subjects With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT03943043
Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer
NCT06214572
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare the 3-month progression rate in patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic cancer of the biliary tract treated with fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy vs gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin. (phase II)
* Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. (phase III)
Secondary
* Compare toxicities of these regimens in these patients. (phase II)
* Compare the quality of life at initial drainage (phase II) and overall (phase III) of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the biliary complication rate in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the duration of hospitalization of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease location (gallbladder vs intrahepatic biliary duct vs extrahepatic biliary duct). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week on days 1-33. Patients also receive fluorouracil IV continuously over 5 days once a week in weeks 1-5 and cisplatin IV over 15 minutes on days 1-4 and 29-32 (or days 1 or 2 and 29 or 30) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 3 months thereafter.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 170 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radio-chimiothérapie
Radio-chimiothérapie
cisplatin
GEMOX
GEMOX
gemcitabine hydrochloride
oxaliplatin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cisplatin
gemcitabine hydrochloride
oxaliplatin
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of cancer of the biliary tract by 1 of the following methods:
* Histologic confirmation
* Stenosis of the biliary tract by MRI, CT scan, or ECHO
* Unresectable disease
* Amenable to radiotherapy
* No visceral metastases by imaging
* Hepatic adenopathies that can be included in a radiation field allowed
* No known ampulla of Vater or pancreatic cancer involving the biliary tract
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* WHO performance status 0-2
* Creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm\^3
* Prothrombin time \> 70%
* Bilirubin ≤ 2.9 mg/dL (after hepatic draining, if needed)
* No unstable angina
* No symptomatic cardiac insufficiency
* No other comorbidity that would preclude study therapy
* No other prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No prior hydatid cyst or alveolar echinococciasis
* Not pregnant or nursing
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* No recent biliary surgery
* No hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy
* No prior anticancer therapy
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruno Chauffert
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier General
Belfort, , France
Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot
Bourgoin, , France
Hopital Louis Pasteur
Colmar, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Dax
Dax, , France
Hopital Du Bocage
Dijon, , France
Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-Francois Leclerc
Dijon, , France
Centre Hospitalier Departemental
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
C. H. Du Mans
Le Mans, , France
CHU de la Timone
Marseille, , France
Centre Hospitalier General de Mont de Marsan
Mont-de-Marsan, , France
CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source
Orléans, , France
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris, , France
CHU Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, , France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Hopital Sebastopol, C.H.U. de Reims
Reims, , France
Centre Eugene Marquis
Rennes, , France
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Semur en Auxois
Semur-en-Auxois, , France
Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre
Strasbourg, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Tarbes
Tarbes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Phelip JM, Vendrely V, Rostain F, Subtil F, Jouve JL, Gasmi M, Michel P, Le Malicot K, Smith D, Seitz JF, Fauchart JP, Martin P, Bennouna J, Morin T, Bonnet I, Maingon P, Lepage C, Chauffert B. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced biliary tract cancer: Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive 9902 phase II randomised study. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(17):2975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FFCD-9902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SANOFI-FFCD-9902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LILLY-FFCD-9902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FFCD-FNCLCC-SFRO-9902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000470411
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.