Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy or Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Nonmetastatic Biliary Tract Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00304135

Last Updated: 2016-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fluorouracil, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving fluorouracil and cisplatin together with radiation therapy is more effective than giving gemcitabine together with oxaliplatin in treating nonmetastatic biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiation therapy to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in treating patients with nonmetastatic biliary tract cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare the 3-month progression rate in patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic cancer of the biliary tract treated with fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy vs gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin. (phase II)
* Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. (phase III)

Secondary

* Compare toxicities of these regimens in these patients. (phase II)
* Compare the quality of life at initial drainage (phase II) and overall (phase III) of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the biliary complication rate in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the duration of hospitalization of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease location (gallbladder vs intrahepatic biliary duct vs extrahepatic biliary duct). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week on days 1-33. Patients also receive fluorouracil IV continuously over 5 days once a week in weeks 1-5 and cisplatin IV over 15 minutes on days 1-4 and 29-32 (or days 1 or 2 and 29 or 30) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 3 months thereafter.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 170 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer Gallbladder Cancer Liver Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radio-chimiothérapie

Radio-chimiothérapie

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

GEMOX

GEMOX

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of cancer of the biliary tract by 1 of the following methods:

* Histologic confirmation
* Stenosis of the biliary tract by MRI, CT scan, or ECHO
* Unresectable disease
* Amenable to radiotherapy
* No visceral metastases by imaging

* Hepatic adenopathies that can be included in a radiation field allowed
* No known ampulla of Vater or pancreatic cancer involving the biliary tract

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* WHO performance status 0-2
* Creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm\^3
* Prothrombin time \> 70%
* Bilirubin ≤ 2.9 mg/dL (after hepatic draining, if needed)
* No unstable angina
* No symptomatic cardiac insufficiency
* No other comorbidity that would preclude study therapy
* No other prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No prior hydatid cyst or alveolar echinococciasis
* Not pregnant or nursing

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* No recent biliary surgery
* No hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy
* No prior anticancer therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruno Chauffert

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier General

Belfort, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot

Bourgoin, , France

Site Status

Hopital Louis Pasteur

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Dax

Dax, , France

Site Status

Hopital Du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-Francois Leclerc

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Departemental

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

C. H. Du Mans

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

CHU de la Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier General de Mont de Marsan

Mont-de-Marsan, , France

Site Status

CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Pitie-Salpetriere

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Hopital Sebastopol, C.H.U. de Reims

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre Eugene Marquis

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Charles Nicolle

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Semur en Auxois

Semur-en-Auxois, , France

Site Status

Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Tarbes

Tarbes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Phelip JM, Vendrely V, Rostain F, Subtil F, Jouve JL, Gasmi M, Michel P, Le Malicot K, Smith D, Seitz JF, Fauchart JP, Martin P, Bennouna J, Morin T, Bonnet I, Maingon P, Lepage C, Chauffert B. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced biliary tract cancer: Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive 9902 phase II randomised study. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(17):2975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25241229 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FFCD-9902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SANOFI-FFCD-9902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LILLY-FFCD-9902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

FFCD-FNCLCC-SFRO-9902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000470411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.