Two Low Volume Regimens for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT04297423

Last Updated: 2022-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1002 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-11

Study Completion Date

2022-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colorectal cancer is the first neoplasm most commonly diagnosed in both sexes and the second leading cause of cancer death in Spain. Colorectal cancer screening Program in Barcelona was implanted in 2009 and approximately 1,500 colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies are performed annually at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Adequate colon preparation (anterograde cleansing with laxatives) improves polyp detection, decreases examination time, and complications. There are both low and high volume intestinal regimens with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the main active ingredient or without it.

Hypothesis: Two low volumen regimens, 1L PEG plus ascorbate and magnesium citrate plus picosulphate, at starting doses have the same Adenoma Detection Rate as cleansing solutions in preparation for screening colonoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy (by comparing the adenoma detection rate) of 1L PEG plus ascorbate versus magnesium citrate plus picosulphate in subjects undergoing colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening programme. We also will compare the Lesion Detection Rate, the quality of colon cleansing (Boston classification) overall and by segments, the tolerability and satisfaction and the rate of adverse effects experienced with intake of these products.

Methodology: A comparative, parallel, randomized, single-centre, low-intervention clinical trial to be conducted at the CCR screening unit of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona that will include 1,002 participants.

Subjects will complete a Tolerability and Satisfaction Questionnaire after completing the bowel preparation. Findings (polyps, CRC, or other lesions) and quality of bowel cleansing will be collected from the colonoscopy report.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A comparative, parallel, randomized, non-inferiority, non-blinded, single-centre and low-intervention clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plenvu

Plenvu split dose

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plenvu

Intervention Type DRUG

randomization 1:1

Citrafleet

citrafleet in split dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Plenvu

Intervention Type DRUG

randomization 1:1

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plenvu

randomization 1:1

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

citrafleet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women aged 50 to 69 years who have participated in the early detection programme for colon and rectal cancer (PDPCCR) in Barcelona, who have obtained a positive result in the faecal occult blood test (≥20 μg Hb/g faeces) and who are scheduled for a screening colonoscopy at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.

Exclusion Criteria

* People who do not agree to participate in the study.
* People with known severe renal failure (grade IV or V) and grade III and IV heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Scale of Functional Assessment of Heart Failure
* Individuals who have undergone a colonoscopy in the past year.
* Subjects meeting the Rome IV Criteria for the diagnosis of functional constipation
* Subjects with mental disabilities or with a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, recurrent severe major depressive disorders, severe obsessive-compulsive disorder, severe personality disorders and bipolar disorders).
* Individuals who do not understand Catalan or Spanish verbally and in writing.
* Individuals with partial or total colon resection.
* Individuals with a personal history of CRC or colorectal disease amenable to specific follow-up (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or colorectal adenomas).
* Individuals with terminal illness or severe illness/disability that contraindicates further study of the colon.
* People with gastrointestinal disorders that contraindicate the use of the study products (gastric emptying disorders, perforation or gastrointestinal obstruction, ileus, toxic megacolon).
* People with congestive heart failure
* Hypermagnesemia
* Rhabdomyolysis
* Phenylketourine
* Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
* People with hypersensitivity to the active ingredients of excipients
* People with severe renal impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Casen Recordati S.L.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

María Pellisé

Principal Investigator. Attending physician Gastroenterology department.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital CLinic

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hautefeuille G, Lapuelle J, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, Molard BR, Coulom P, Laugier R, Henri F, Cadiot G. Factors related to bowel cleansing failure before colonoscopy: Results of the PACOME study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Feb;2(1):22-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640613518200.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24918005 (View on PubMed)

Schreiber S, Baumgart DC, Drenth JPH, Filip RS, Clayton LB, Hylands K, Repici A, Hassan C; DAYB Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1055/a-0639-5070. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30025415 (View on PubMed)

Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, Ng Kwet Shing R, Alvarez-Gonzalez M; MORA Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30025414 (View on PubMed)

DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, Epstein MS; NOCT Study Group. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28803744 (View on PubMed)

Seo SI, Kang JG, Kim HS, Jang MK, Kim HY, Shin WG. Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29497812 (View on PubMed)

Lee SW, Bang CS, Park TY, Suk KT, Baik GH, Kim DJ. Split-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: 2 Liters Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid versus Sodium Picosulfate versus Oral Sodium Phosphate Tablets. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 25;70(2):89-95. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2017.70.2.89.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28830134 (View on PubMed)

Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19136102 (View on PubMed)

Patel M, Staggs E, Thomas CS, Lukens F, Wallace M, Almansa C. Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;46(9):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24953203 (View on PubMed)

Guillaumes S, O'Callaghan CA. [Spanish adaptation of the free OxMaR software for minimization and randomization of clinical studies]. Gac Sanit. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):395-397. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30390995 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HCB/2019/0872

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Virtual Reality During Colonoscopy Procedures
NCT06236386 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA