Two Low Volume Regimens for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT04297423
Last Updated: 2022-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1002 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-11
2022-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Two low volumen regimens, 1L PEG plus ascorbate and magnesium citrate plus picosulphate, at starting doses have the same Adenoma Detection Rate as cleansing solutions in preparation for screening colonoscopy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Based on a Non-invasive Metabolomics Profile
NCT06452745
Colorectal Cancer: Screening vs. Non-Screening
NCT02727894
Comparative Study of Colon Capsule and Virtual Colonoscopy (VICOCA)
NCT02081742
Usefulness of Chromoendoscopy for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
NCT02543762
Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for T1 Colorectal Cancer
NCT04150081
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methodology: A comparative, parallel, randomized, single-centre, low-intervention clinical trial to be conducted at the CCR screening unit of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona that will include 1,002 participants.
Subjects will complete a Tolerability and Satisfaction Questionnaire after completing the bowel preparation. Findings (polyps, CRC, or other lesions) and quality of bowel cleansing will be collected from the colonoscopy report.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plenvu
Plenvu split dose
Plenvu
randomization 1:1
Citrafleet
citrafleet in split dose
Plenvu
randomization 1:1
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plenvu
randomization 1:1
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* People with known severe renal failure (grade IV or V) and grade III and IV heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Scale of Functional Assessment of Heart Failure
* Individuals who have undergone a colonoscopy in the past year.
* Subjects meeting the Rome IV Criteria for the diagnosis of functional constipation
* Subjects with mental disabilities or with a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, recurrent severe major depressive disorders, severe obsessive-compulsive disorder, severe personality disorders and bipolar disorders).
* Individuals who do not understand Catalan or Spanish verbally and in writing.
* Individuals with partial or total colon resection.
* Individuals with a personal history of CRC or colorectal disease amenable to specific follow-up (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or colorectal adenomas).
* Individuals with terminal illness or severe illness/disability that contraindicates further study of the colon.
* People with gastrointestinal disorders that contraindicate the use of the study products (gastric emptying disorders, perforation or gastrointestinal obstruction, ileus, toxic megacolon).
* People with congestive heart failure
* Hypermagnesemia
* Rhabdomyolysis
* Phenylketourine
* Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
* People with hypersensitivity to the active ingredients of excipients
* People with severe renal impairment
50 Years
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Casen Recordati S.L.
INDUSTRY
Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
OTHER
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
María Pellisé
Principal Investigator. Attending physician Gastroenterology department.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital CLinic
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hautefeuille G, Lapuelle J, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, Molard BR, Coulom P, Laugier R, Henri F, Cadiot G. Factors related to bowel cleansing failure before colonoscopy: Results of the PACOME study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Feb;2(1):22-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640613518200.
Schreiber S, Baumgart DC, Drenth JPH, Filip RS, Clayton LB, Hylands K, Repici A, Hassan C; DAYB Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1055/a-0639-5070. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, Ng Kwet Shing R, Alvarez-Gonzalez M; MORA Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, Epstein MS; NOCT Study Group. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Seo SI, Kang JG, Kim HS, Jang MK, Kim HY, Shin WG. Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Lee SW, Bang CS, Park TY, Suk KT, Baik GH, Kim DJ. Split-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: 2 Liters Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid versus Sodium Picosulfate versus Oral Sodium Phosphate Tablets. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 25;70(2):89-95. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2017.70.2.89.
Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
Patel M, Staggs E, Thomas CS, Lukens F, Wallace M, Almansa C. Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;46(9):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Guillaumes S, O'Callaghan CA. [Spanish adaptation of the free OxMaR software for minimization and randomization of clinical studies]. Gac Sanit. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):395-397. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Spanish.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Las cifras del cáncer en España 2018 - SEOM: Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica © 2019
Guía clínica de Calidad en la Colonoscopia de Cribado del CCR
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCB/2019/0872
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.