Performance and Evaluation for CT Colonography Screening

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

139 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-20

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important United Kingdom healthcare issue affecting 1 in 20 individuals, half of whom will die from the disease. Late presentation of CRC has a poor prognosis, whereas excellent cure rates (\>95%) are seen in those who present early. Accurate and early diagnosis of CRC is therefore crucial. In most patients this is achieved via colonoscopy, a camera test which is widely available and allows tissue samples to be taken of any abnormalities seen during the procedure. However, a non-invasive alternative is Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC) which uses X-rays to produce images of the large bowel which are then interpreted by Radiologists. CTC has high sensitivity for the diagnosis of CRC (comparable to colonoscopy) and the cancer precursor - adenomatous polyps.

Unlike colonoscopy, however, there is no accreditation process for CTC and there is no infrastructure to ensure that all reporting Radiologists are able to do so adequately and, as a result, there is a wide range of diagnostic accuracy. There are no universally-accepted standards to monitor quality or assess diagnostic performance, partly because we do not know what the quality markers are and there is currently no system to quantify them. Overall, this contributes to low cancer detection rates, missed cancers and inequity for patients across the National Health Service (NHS).

This study aims to assess the impact of a structured training programme with assessment and feedback on NHS radiologist performance. If the impact is positive and results in significantly improved performance, then such a scheme could be adopted into an accreditation programme for CTC in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP).

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

CT Colonography as the Initial Diagnostic Imaging Tool for Patients With Suspected Colorectal Cancer

NCT02820389

Colorectal Cancer

UNKNOWN

Colorectal Cancer: Screening vs. Non-Screening

NCT02727894

Colorectal Cancer Screening

COMPLETED

Prospective Assessment of CONECCT's Classification for Colorectal Lesions.

NCT05983315

Colorectal Cancer

COMPLETED

Does Numerical And Pictorial Information On Risk And Benefit Affects The Uptake Of Colorectal Cancer Screening?

NCT01250015

Colorectal Cancer Screening

COMPLETED

Non-cathartic Computed Tomographic Colonography to Screen Subjects With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

NCT01766479

Colorectal Neoplasia

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

CT Colonography is a test which can can detect early cancer accurately, however, unlike colonoscopy (or mammography in breast cancer screening) there is currently no formalised program to help ensure Radiologists interpret CTC accurately. Colonoscopists are highly regulated, must be accredited and have ongoing quality assurance metrics, based on evidence linking these to clinical outcomes. Conversely, for CTC in the United Kingdom, there is no accreditation process, little regulatory oversight and no universally-accepted metrics to monitor quality or diagnostic performance.

Radiologists who interpret CTC images are often inexperienced; one-third have interpreted \<300 cases in total and 20% report \<100 cases per annum (the minimum recommendation). Futhermore, in clinical practice across the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (NHS BCSP) CTC may have up to a 50% lower cancer and polyp detection rate than colonoscopy. Missed abnormalities at CTC are likely to underpin this difference, as centres with highly experienced radiologists (\>1000 cases) using 3-dimensional interpretation have significantly higher detection rates.

There is a Quality Assurance (QA) framework for the NHS BCSP (with an overseeing QA Committee for Radiology) but recommendations are largely based on opinion rather than evidence and any radiologist can report CTC, without accreditation; a fact which our patient representatives find extremely disappointing.

Prior to wide-scale implementation of a possible accreditation programme and to justify both financial and human resource, Public Health England and the British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists have mandated that such a program is scientifically proven to improve Radiologist performance. Consequently, this project will investigate training and assessment methods to improve diagnostic accuracy and elucidate the factors associated with higher Radiologist sensitivity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonic Neoplasms Colorectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

The control group will not receive the one-day training course or access to the online educational module. Test sets will be administered in the same manner as for the intervention group, but the control group will not receive any feedback on performance during the 12 month assessment phase. Feedback on test performance will only be provided after the 12 month period has ended.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Training with feedback

See intervention description

Group Type OTHER

Training with feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

One-day workshop of face to face training, comprising a mixture of theory and real-world CTC cases. Radiologists will complete four interpretation assessments lasting 2 to 3 hours: one set of 10 CTC cases immediately prior to training and a further test set of 10 immediately after, with tests repeated at 6 and 12 months (using different CTC cases for each set). Radiologists will be asked to identify colorectal cancer and polyps on the scans and complete an online answer form, including questions regarding diagnostic confidence, site of abnormality and management.

The intervention group will receive online, confidential, individualised feedback after each test, which will include a case by case breakdown of their performance with explanatory answers and learning points.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Training with feedback

One-day workshop of face to face training, comprising a mixture of theory and real-world CTC cases. Radiologists will complete four interpretation assessments lasting 2 to 3 hours: one set of 10 CTC cases immediately prior to training and a further test set of 10 immediately after, with tests repeated at 6 and 12 months (using different CTC cases for each set). Radiologists will be asked to identify colorectal cancer and polyps on the scans and complete an online answer form, including questions regarding diagnostic confidence, site of abnormality and management.

The intervention group will receive online, confidential, individualised feedback after each test, which will include a case by case breakdown of their performance with explanatory answers and learning points.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* National Health Service (NHS) Consultant Radiologists or final year Registrars or Fellows in the England or Wales who currently routinely report CT colonography scans.