Health of Pessary Versus Progesterone Supplement for Preventing Preterm Birth Children
NCT ID: NCT04295187
Last Updated: 2021-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
529 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-03-06
2020-12-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pessary Versus Cerclage With or Without Progesterone in Twins
NCT03863613
Pessary Versus Progesterone in Singletons
NCT04300322
Cerclage With Progesterone Versus Progesterone Only in Singleton Pregnancies
NCT06463652
Cervical Pessary vs. Vaginal Progesterone for Preventing Premature Birth in IVF Twin Pregnancies
NCT02623881
Effect of Cervical Cerclage With Vaginal Progesterone in Asymptomatic Twin Pregnancies With a Sonographic Short Cervix
NCT03781466
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In our research, the results showed that the preterm birth rate before 34 weeks in the cervical pessary group was lower than the progesterone group (16% vs 22%, RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 - 1.18). The perinatal outcomes were also better in the cervical pessary group than in the progesterone group (19% vs 27%, RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.43 - 0.93). The cost of the cervical pessary method was also significantly lower than the vaginal progesterone method cost. Pessary insertion was also more convenient since it was only inserted once during pregnancy, compared to daily vaginal progesterone. Therefore, the cervical pessary may be an appropriate option for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix.
However, besides these short-term outcomes, we need to pay more attention to the longer-term issues of both mothers and infants. Some evidence up to now has demonstrated that both these two methods are safe with no impact on physical, mental, and motor development of children up to 3 years old and even in older children. However, such evidence is still rare. Also, there hasn't been any study evaluating the impact, if any, of these two PB preventive methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical pessary
Cervical pessary (Arabin) will be inserted to participants at 16-22 weeks and removed at 37 weeks of pregnancy or in case of premature rupture of membranes, signs of preterm labour or patient severe discomfort.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Vaginal Progesterone
Vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest 200 mg) once a day will be used, from 16-22 to 37 weeks of pregnancy or in case of premature rupture of membranes, signs of preterm labour or patient severe discomfort.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parents agree to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
1 Month
66 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dang Q Vinh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dang VQ, Nguyen LK, Pham TD, He YTN, Vu KN, Phan MTN, Le TQ, Le CH, Vuong LN, Mol BW. Pessary Compared With Vaginal Progesterone for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women With Twin Pregnancies and Cervical Length Less Than 38 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):459-467. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003136.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CS/BVMĐ/20/03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.