Efficacy of Oral Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone After Tocolytic Therapy in Threatened Preterm Labor

NCT ID: NCT02989519

Last Updated: 2017-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

231 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy of vaginal and oral progesterone after tocolytic therapy in threatened preterm labor

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August 2015 through December 2016. All pregnant women with single pregnancies of 28 to 33 weeks and 6 days who had been experienced for threatened or preterm labor with intact membrane as in inclusion criteria were approached and ask for enrollment. The gestational age of all patients was confirmed by antenatal record review and ultrasonographic confirmation. Threatened preterm labor was defined as the presence of regular uterine contractions without significant cervical changes as determined by digital pelvic examination. Preterm labor was defined as the simultaneous presence of regular uterine contractions and cervical changes, shortening and/or softening, or dilatation, as determined by digital pelvic examination. The women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. The patients who had proven membranes ruptured, and ultrasonographically found placenta previa, multiple pregnancy, fetal anomaly or aneuploidy would excluded. The participants had emergency condition that required for emergency delivery such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis were also excluded. Participants were randomized into three groups which generated by computer programme to receive whether oral progesterone (dydrogesterone 10 mg; Duphaston™) per oral three times a day or vaginal progesterone (micronized progesterone 200 mg; Utrogestan™) or no progesterone (controlled group). All patients were digitally pelvic examined for evaluation of Bishop score and assessed cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound at enrollment and follow up visit at two weeks apart. Cervical length was measured by standard technique with a covered probe inserted into vagina after each woman had emptied her bladder. Excessive pressure on cervix was avoided. The mean value of 3 consecutive measurements was used for analysis. Informed consent and demographic data were obtained at the enrollment. Primary outcomes were preterm delivery before 34 and 37 weeks. Secondary outcomes include time until delivery (latency period,days), change of cervical length (cervical attenuation), maternal outcome, neonatal outcome, and side effects of drugs were collected. The main outcomes of preterm delivery, gestational age at parturition and birthweight were also collected by telephone call in case of out-side-hospital born or in case loss to follow up. Monitoring of all patients was evaluated every follow up visit for drug side effect, allergic response, and adverse events Statistical analysis Sample size was calculated according to the results of two studies by Dorota AgataBomba - Opon and Manju Choudhary which showed significant decreased preterm delivery \<34 weeks (9.8% vs 35.3%,p=0.002) in vaginal progesterone group, and significant decreased preterm birth (33% vs 58% ; p= 0.034) in oral progesterone group. The sample size of 231 was used to evaluate the primary outcome of both drugs. Descriptive statistics were carried out using mean, median, standard deviation, interquartile range. Categorical data were tested for significance with the χ2tests. Continuous data were evaluated for normal distribution and tested for significance with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. Student t test and Man-Whitney U test were used to test significance between groups in case there is significant detection in ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test among groups. Statistical significance was defined as p\<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Delivery

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

preterm labor progesterone efficacy threatened preterm labor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

no progesterone

All women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

oral progesterone

All women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. All women in this arm received oral progesterone (dydrogesterone 10 mg; Duphaston™) per oral three times a day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dydrogesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

vaginal progesterone

All women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. All women in this arm received vaginal progesterone (micronized progesterone 200 mg; Utrogestan™) at bed time.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micronized progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dydrogesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

Micronized progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Duphaston Utrogestan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Single pregnancies of 28 to 33 weeks and 6 days who had been experienced for threatened or preterm labor with intact membrane

Exclusion Criteria

* Proven membranes ruptured
* Ultrasonographically found placenta previa, multiple pregnancy, fetal anomaly
* Aneuploidy detected.
* Had emergency condition that required for emergency delivery such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis, prolapsed cord
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanpasitthiprasong Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Piyawadee Wuttikonsammakit

Instructor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piyawadee Wuttikonsammakit, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instructor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Piyawadee Wuttikonsammakit

Nai Muang, Changwat Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPS2016-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id