Cerclage With Progesterone Versus Progesterone Only in Singleton Pregnancies

NCT ID: NCT06463652

Last Updated: 2025-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

328 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-26

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the effectiveness of cervical cerclage with vaginal progesterone to vaginal progesterone only for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervical length. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage with vaginal progesterone (the combined therapy group) to vaginal progesterone only (the progesterone-only group) for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a cervical length ≤ 25mm.

After written informed consent, women will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a cervical cerclage with vaginal progesterone or vaginal progesterone only. Randomization will be carried out by entering participant details into HOPE Epi® (a web portal of HOPE Research Center, My Duc Hospital). Treatment allocation will be assigned according to a computer-generated randomization list stored in the online system, with a permuted random block size of 2, 4, or 6. Blinding will not be possible due to the nature of interventions. However, neonatologists assessing the neonates will be unaware of treatment allocation. Apart from randomization, participants will be monitored and treated according to local protocol.

All women at 16 0/7 to 24 0/7 weeks' gestation with a singleton pregnancy will undergo cervical length measurement and digital examination at screening routinely. Women with a cervical length ≤25 mm will be eligible for the study. Eligible women will further undergo a speculum examination to assess the feasibility of treatment with either cervical cerclage or vaginal progesterone and to exclude premature rupture of the membranes, acute vaginitis, and cervicitis. Only women in whom the clinician assesses both treatments as feasible will be randomized.

Women allocated to a combined therapy group will receive the intervention according to local protocol within a week after randomization. Briefly, cervical cerclage (McDonald technique) will be performed in the operation theatre. From the same day of undergoing cerclage, participants will be receiving 200 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), once daily at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a participant diary sheet.

Women allocated to the progesterone-only group will be receiving 200 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), once daily at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a participant diary sheet.

In both groups, interventions will be stopped at 37 0/7 weeks of gestation or at delivery.

Primary analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome, the time from randomization to delivery, will be summarised as median and IQR and compared between the two arms using the Mann-Whitney test. A mean ratio with a 95% confidence interval will be calculated to assess the effect of the treatment. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis will be performed in which the gestational week at delivery will be the time scale, continued pregnancy will be the event, and results will be compared with a log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) values will be estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, with a formal test of the proportional hazard assumption.

The secondary outcome will be analysed by reporting continuous variables as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables or median and interquartile range (Q1; Q3) for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables will be presented as the number of events and proportions. Student T-test or Mann-Whitney U test will be used for continuous outcomes to compare the differences between groups. For categorical outcomes, the Chi-squared or Fisher exact test will be used. In the case of dichotomous endpoints, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values will be calculated using the Wald or Adjusted Wald methods for a small proportion. Per-protocol analysis will also be conducted if needed.

A prespecified subgroup analysis will be performed by quartiles of cervical length, which tested for interaction between cervical length and the treatment effect on the primary outcome, the major secondary outcome and PTB \<28, \<34, \<37 weeks.

The p-values \<0.05 will be considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses will be performed using the R statistical software.

Details of the analysis will be described in a separate statistical analysis plan developed during the study and finalized before the data lock. Cost data will be collected and will be reported on a separated paper.

Interim analysis will be done after completion of data recruitment of the first 162 participants, by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee will be asked to assess the primary endpoint for effectiveness. Also, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee will be provided insight into the serious adverse events (SAEs) that have occurred. The interim analysis will be conducted using a two-sided significant test with the Haybittle-Peto spending function and a type I error rate of 5 percent with p \<0.001 (Z alpha = 3.29) being a reason to stop the trial. The continuation of the study will depend on the advice of Data Safety Monitoring Committee.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth Short Cervix

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combined therapy group (cervical cerclage plus vaginal progesterone)

Women will be receiving the cervical cerclage according to local protocol within a week after randomization, using the McDonald technique.

Within one day after the procedure, they will be receiving 200 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), once daily at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a patient diary sheet.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cervical cerclage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cervical cerclage using the McDonald technique under anaesthesia.

Vaginal progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom, applied once daily at bedtime.

Progesterone only group

Women allocated to the progesterone only group will be receiving 200 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), once daily at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a patient diary sheet.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom, applied once daily at bedtime.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cervical cerclage

Cervical cerclage using the McDonald technique under anaesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vaginal progesterone

Cyclogest® 200mg, Actavis, United Kingdom, applied once daily at bedtime.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cyclogest® 200 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Maternal age ≥18 years
* Singleton pregnancy
* Cervical length ≤ 25 mm, measured by TVS at the second-trimester ultrasonography (16 0/7 - 24 0/7 weeks of gestation)
* Not participating in any other study which has intervention on maternity or fetus
* Provision of written informed consent as shown by a signature on the participant consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cervical dilation with visible amniotic membranes or amniotic membranes prolapsed into the vagina
* Major congenital abnormalities of the fetus
* Intrauterine fetal demise
* Presence of severe vaginal discharge\*
* Presence of vaginitis or cervicitis\*
* Presence of vaginal bleeding\*
* Placenta previa or vasa previa
* Preterm premature rupture of membranes
* Preterm labor without ruptured membrane at the time of screening
* Suspected chorioamnionitis
* Unable to undergo cerclage
* Cerclage in place
* Allergy to progesterone

(\*Women with acute cervicitis, vaginitis or severe vaginal discharge are eligible once they have been treated and if they have a CL ≤25 mm between 16 0/7 - 24 0/7 weeks of gestation.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mỹ Đức Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

My Duc Hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thanh V Le, MD

Role: CONTACT

+84934124733

Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+84903008889

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tuong M Ho, MD

Role: primary

+84 90 3633377

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08/24/DD-BVMD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cerclage for Twins With Short Cervix
NCT03077633 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3
PREGNANT Short Cervix Trial
NCT00615550 COMPLETED PHASE3
Vaginal Progesterone in Twins With Short Cervix
NCT01812239 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3
The Vaginal Progesterone and Cerclage
NCT02846909 COMPLETED PHASE2