Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques

NCT ID: NCT04284644

Last Updated: 2020-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-01

Study Completion Date

2017-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. This technique is considered an approach that can be of a great benefit to patients with chronic medical illnesses and those who have moderate to high risk for general anaesthesia.

In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction. The investigators evaluated the time needed for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, number of LMA insertion trials, succession of LMA insertion, adverse events related to the airway, respiratory and cardiovascular systems, haemodynamic stability and satisfaction scores of enrolled patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group P

Patient received a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of Propofol slowly over 2 minutes for induction.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Induction using propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.

Group S

Patient received 8% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Induction using sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.

Group C

Patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Induction using propofol and sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Induction using propofol

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction using sevoflurane

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction using propofol and sevoflurane

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with Age ≥ 65 years.
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score II or III.
* minimally invasive endoscopic urological procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* patient refusal.
* Age \< 65 years.
* family history of malignant hyperthermia.
* prolonged surgery that needed intubation.
* body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Jordan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

omar ahmad ababneh

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jordan University Hospital

Amman, , Jordan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Jordan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10/2016/4597

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sevoflurane, Propofol, Postoperative Pain
NCT01437462 COMPLETED PHASE4