Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques
NCT ID: NCT04284644
Last Updated: 2020-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-01
2017-01-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Induction of Anesthesia With Sevoflurane Preserving Spontaneous Breathing: Cardiorespiratory Effects.
NCT04802122
Intravenous Anesthesia by Targeted Controlled Infusion Versus Inhalational Anesthesia on the Surgical Stress Response
NCT06024733
A Comparison of Inhalation vs. Intravenous Induction
NCT02331108
Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822
Propofol and Sevoflurane for Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort
NCT02252445
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction. The investigators evaluated the time needed for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, number of LMA insertion trials, succession of LMA insertion, adverse events related to the airway, respiratory and cardiovascular systems, haemodynamic stability and satisfaction scores of enrolled patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group P
Patient received a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of Propofol slowly over 2 minutes for induction.
Induction using propofol
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.
Group S
Patient received 8% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Induction using sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Group C
Patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.
Induction using propofol and sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Induction using propofol
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.
Induction using sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Induction using propofol and sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score II or III.
* minimally invasive endoscopic urological procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \< 65 years.
* family history of malignant hyperthermia.
* prolonged surgery that needed intubation.
* body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2.
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Jordan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
omar ahmad ababneh
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jordan University Hospital
Amman, , Jordan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10/2016/4597
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.