Project to Improve Communication About Serious Illness--Hospital Study: Pragmatic Trial (Trial 1)
NCT ID: NCT04281784
Last Updated: 2025-04-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2512 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-23
2022-09-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel EHR-based (electronic health record) clinician Jumpstart guide, compared with usual care, for improving the quality of care; the primary outcome is documentation of a goals-of-care discussion in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization. Secondary outcomes focus on intensity of care: ICU use, ICU and hospital length of stay, costs of care during the hospitalization, and 7 and 30-day hospital readmissions.
2. To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the intervention, guided by the RE-AIM framework for implementation science, incorporating quantitative evaluation of the intervention's reach and adoption, as well as qualitative analyses of interviews with participants, to explore barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Patient-clinician Communication About End-of-life Care
NCT00374010
Pilot Mobile for Dementia and Frailty
NCT05827094
Social Participation Program for Older Adults in Nursing Homes
NCT07079124
Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia
NCT01774799
Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services
NCT02505035
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This current study is "Trial 1" of the R01 Award funding this trial. Trial 2 was initiated following the completion of recruitment for Trial 1.
SPECIFIC AIM 1 (for Trial 1): Evaluate the efficacy of the EHR-based clinician Jumpstart compared to usual care for improving quality of care.
TRIAL 1 has three components.
Component 1- Subject Identification/Recruitment/Randomization: The investigators will use automated methods with EHR data, including natural language processing/machine learning (NLP/ML) approaches, to identify hospitalized patients with serious illness during the first 2-3 days of this specific admission. Screening reports will be produced daily and include all likely eligible patients. Study staff will use these daily screening reports to review individual records of eligible patients for inclusion and exclusion criteria (i.e. verify eligibility). Patients will not be approached for consent. Eligible patients will be assigned to intervention or comparator in a 1:1 ratio. Patients are randomized using variable size blocks and stratified for hospital and ADRD vs. no ADRD.
Component 2- EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide: The Jumpstart guide is developed by applying NLP/ML algorithms to both inpatient and outpatient EHR notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. It summarizes the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA (durable power of attorney) documentation and the patients' code status. It also provides general recommendations to initiating goals of care discussions. Jumpstart guides are prepared for the intervention group only.
Component 3- Delivery of the intervention: For the intervention group, the investigators deliver the Jumpstart guide to the primary hospital team (attending and resident physicians and advanced practice providers) via secure email. The Jumpstart guides are delivered within 1 business day of patient randomization. Study staff monitor the care team of the patient, and if there are any changes, ensure that any new providers receive the Jumpstart guide as well.
Comparator: The hospital teams for patients in the control group do not receive Jumpstart guides.
Outcome Assessment. Outcomes are obtained from the EHR and use, in part, NLP/ML methods. The primary outcome is EHR documentation of goals-of-care discussions in the 30 days following randomization. Secondary outcomes are measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics (i.e., ICU admissions, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, 30-day hospital readmissions), costs of care during hospital admission, and estimated costs of implementing the intervention.
SPECIFIC AIM 2 (Trial 1): Evaluate implementation of the Jumpstart Guide and identify barriers and facilitators to future implementation.
Qualitative evaluation:
Clinician recruitment: Study staff will recruit clinicians who were involved with the study to participate in a short interview after the clinician's study involvement with the enrolled patient has ended. Clinician participants will be selected using purposive sampling to ensure a diverse group (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, specialty, year of training).
Interview: Using an interview guide developed specifically for this project, interviewers will assess respondents' experience with the intervention and gather suggestions for ways to improve the intervention's content, delivery and implementation, including implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, fidelity, penetration, maintenance) that will guide future dissemination of the intervention.
Assessment: Interviews are audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analytic methods.
Quantitative evaluation:
Quantitative evaluation for Specific Aim 2 will be guided by the RE-AIM framework. We will evaluate the intervention's: 1) Reach (% of all identified eligible clinicians, patients and families that participated in the study); 2) Adoption (% of eligible services that participated); and 3) Implementation (the proportion of HTML Jumpstart Guides that were opened by a clinician, proportion of patients for whom an HTML JS guide was sent and for whom a JS was opened by a clinician).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart
The EHR-based Jumpstart Guide will be developed by extracting data from the EHR using automated methods with both inpatient and outpatient notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. It will summarize the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation and patients' code status.
EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart
The Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The one-page Jumpstart Guide provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation and code status derived from the EHR. The Jumpstart Guides includes tips to improve goals-of-care communication.
Usual Care
The clinicians (hospital teams) for patients in the control group will not receive Jumpstart guides. These subjects will receive usual care.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart
The Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The one-page Jumpstart Guide provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation and code status derived from the EHR. The Jumpstart Guides includes tips to improve goals-of-care communication.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CLINICIANS (Interview). Eligible clinicians will be those who are 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, employed at a participating hospital, and have been the clinician of record for an enrolled patient in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
R. Engelberg
Research Professor; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence; Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruth Engelberg, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
UW Medical Center - Northwest
Seattle, Washington, United States
UW Medical Center - Montlake (UWMC)
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Curtis JR, Lee RY, Brumback LC, Kross EK, Downey L, Torrence J, Heywood J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Im J, Weiner BJ, Khandelwal N, Abedini NC, Engelberg RA. Improving communication about goals of care for hospitalized patients with serious illness: Study protocol for two complementary randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Sep;120:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106879. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Curtis JR, Lee RY, Brumback LC, Kross EK, Downey L, Torrence J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Im J, Heywood J, Brown CE, Sibley J, Lober WB, Cohen T, Weiner BJ, Khandelwal N, Abedini NC, Engelberg RA. Intervention to Promote Communication About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Jun 20;329(23):2028-2037. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8812.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00007031-A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.