Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes

NCT ID: NCT02612688

Last Updated: 2020-10-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

197692 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pragmatic cluster-randomized control trial (RCT) of an Advance Care Planning (ACP) Video Program for nursing home (NH) patients ≥ 65 years old who are cared for in 360 NH facilities (intervention arm n=119; control arm n=241) within two NH health care systems: Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth. The intervention NH facilities will implement the ACP Video Program, while the control NH facilities will follow their usual ACP procedures. The trial will evaluate the effectiveness of the ACP Video Program by comparing hospitalizations, advance directives, and hospice use in the intervention vs. control NHs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nursing homes are complex health care systems that serve increasingly sick patients who have advanced comorbid conditions. NHs are often charged with guiding patients through decisions about the direction of their treatment. Patients at NHs commonly get aggressive care that may be inconsistent with their preferences and of little clinical benefit. Identifying effective approaches that NHs can use to better promote goal-directed care and optimize resources is a research, public health, and clinical priority.

Advance care planning is the most consistent modifiable factor associated with better palliative care outcomes. Traditional ACP relies on verbal descriptions of hypothetical health states and treatments. This approach is limited because complex scenarios are difficult to envision, counseling is inconsistent, and verbal explanations are hindered by literacy and language barriers.

To address these shortcomings, the PROVEN project has developed video-assisted ACP decision-support tools that have shown efficacy in small randomized controlled trials. While several large health care systems have begun to adopt the videos, efforts have not rigorously evaluated outcomes-a critical step prior to widespread implementation.

The goal of PROVEN is to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the ACP Video Program in the NH setting by partnering with 2 large health care systems that operate 456 nursing homes nationwide. This work has the potential to improve the care provided to millions of older Americans in nursing homes and enable future pragmatic trials in this setting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alzheimer Disease Dementia Heart Failure Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACP Video Program

Facility asked to implement ACP Video Program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACP Video Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The ACP Video Program consists of five videos that address ACP decisions: (1) General Goals of Care, (2) Goals of Care for Advanced Dementia, (3) Hospice, (4) Hospitalization, and (5) ACP for Healthy Patients. NH staff will offer videos to patients at these clinical triggers: (1) Within 7 days of admission or readmission; (2) Every 6 months for long-stay patients; (3) When there is a significant change in clinical status; (4) When a treatment decision arises for which there is a specific video; and (5) Special circumstances when goals of care are being considered (e.g., family visiting).

Usual ACP procedures

Facility follows usual ACP procedures

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACP Video Program

The ACP Video Program consists of five videos that address ACP decisions: (1) General Goals of Care, (2) Goals of Care for Advanced Dementia, (3) Hospice, (4) Hospitalization, and (5) ACP for Healthy Patients. NH staff will offer videos to patients at these clinical triggers: (1) Within 7 days of admission or readmission; (2) Every 6 months for long-stay patients; (3) When there is a significant change in clinical status; (4) When a treatment decision arises for which there is a specific video; and (5) Special circumstances when goals of care are being considered (e.g., family visiting).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Facilities are within Genesis HealthCare or PruittHealth health care systems
* Facilities have facility identifiers that indicate that they are Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing facilities in the U.S.
* Facilities serve both short and long-stay patients
* Facilities have \>50 beds
* Facilities have an electronic medical records system
* Facilities had at least 20 admissions and 20 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (regardless of whether they were discharged alive) in 2013

Exclusion Criteria

* Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of recent turnover in NH administrator or Director of Nursing
* Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of recent bad state or federal quality assurance survey (e.g. restriction on admissions, levied large civil monetary penalty, etc.)
* Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of current new initiatives/competing demands
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hebrew SeniorLife

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Genesis HealthCare

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

PruittHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brown University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Vincent Mor

Professor of Medical Science, Florence Pirce Grant University Professor, Health Services, Policy & Practice

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Mor, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brown University

Susan Mitchell, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hebrew SeniorLife

Angelo Volandes, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

PruittHealth

Norcross, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Genesis HealthCare

Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McCreedy EM, Yang X, Mitchell SL, Gutman R, Teno J, Loomer L, Moyo P, Volandes A, Gozalo PL, Belanger E, Ogarek J, Mor V. Effect of advance care planning video on do-not-hospitalize orders for nursing home residents with advanced illness. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02970-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35392827 (View on PubMed)

Mitchell SL, Volandes AE, Gutman R, Gozalo PL, Ogarek JA, Loomer L, McCreedy EM, Zhai R, Mor V. Advance Care Planning Video Intervention Among Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1070-1078. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2366.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32628258 (View on PubMed)

Palmer JA, Parker VA, Barre LR, Mor V, Volandes AE, Belanger E, Loomer L, McCreedy E, Mitchell SL. Understanding implementation fidelity in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in the nursing home setting:a mixed-methods examination. Trials. 2019 Nov 28;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3725-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31779684 (View on PubMed)

Palmer JA, Parker VA, Mor V, Volandes AE, Barre LR, Belanger E, Carter P, Loomer L, McCreedy E, Mitchell SL. Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31357993 (View on PubMed)

Loomer L, McCreedy E, Belanger E, Palmer JA, Mitchell SL, Volandes AE, Mor V. Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):804-809.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.133. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30852167 (View on PubMed)

Palmer JA, Mor V, Volandes AE, McCreedy E, Loomer L, Carter P, Dvorchak F, Mitchell SL. A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems. Trials. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2817-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30134976 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/uh3-project-pragmatic-trial-of-video-education-in-nursing-homes-proven/

NIH Collaboratory website for UH3 Project: Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4UH3AG049619-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

4UH3AG049619-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.