FAME: Functional Assessment of a Myoelectric Orthosis Hand Orthoses

NCT ID: NCT04266158

Last Updated: 2022-04-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-01

Study Completion Date

2018-09-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary study objective is to compare post-stroke upper extremity (UE) movement while wearing a brace called the MyoPro 2 Motion G versus UE movement while wearing a resting splint and no device in stroke survivors with moderate UE dysfunction. During the study, subjects will undergo general training in the operation of the EMG-controlled orthosis and the comparison orthosis, and then guided through a series of standard clinical outcome measures. These outcome measures will allow the researchers to directly compare the relative benefit of the MyoPro 2 Motion G with a resting hand splint and no device in reducing UE impairment and increasing UE dexterity and functional task performance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Paresis Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MyoPro 2 Motion-G-orthosis-None

Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects. After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device. The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Myoelectric UE Device-UE Orthosis-No Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.

Comfy Splint

Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects. After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device. The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Myoelectric UE Device-UE Orthosis-No Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.

No Splint

Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects. After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device. The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Myoelectric UE Device-UE Orthosis-No Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Myoelectric UE Device-UE Orthosis-No Device

all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE. The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Manual Muscle Test \>1/5 in the paretic biceps, triceps, finger extensors and finger flexors;
* score \> 10 \< 30 on the Upper extremity Fugl Meyer AND active shoulder flexion of at least 30 degrees with device weight on affected arm;
* Ability to generate consistent, detectable EMG signal from the bicep/tricep upper arm and distal forearm flexor and extensor sensor sites with wrist in neutral, and fingers in neutral. At rest, achieve an EMG of 5 or below on myConfig (wrist and fingers in neutral and elbow extended); with gain at \< 10 and boost \<12, able to reach a threshold of 10 at both bicep and wrist flexors/extensors;
* a single stroke that is the cause of arm impairment, experienced \>12 months ago; if there are additional asymptomatic lesions (as diagnosed by MRI), these subjects may also be included. Those with another symptomatic stroke in addition to the stroke causing arm impairment are excluded;
* score \>70 on the Modified Mini Mental Status Examination;
* age \>18\< 85;
* \> 6 months since previous functional or therapeutic use of an upper extremity myoelectric orthosis;
* Height \>5'0";
* Weight \>110\< 250 lbs.;
* Forearm circumference (at widest part) \<13 in.;
* Bicep circumference \>9 \<15 in.;
* Upper arm length \>5.5 in.;
* Wrist thickness (anterior- posterior) \<1.75 in.;
* ability to stand with minimal assistance

Exclusion Criteria

* \> 5 on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale for pain in the paretic hand, arm or shoulder;
* \> 3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale in the paretic elbow, \>2 at wrist or fingers;
* \< 2.5 on the Alexander Apraxia scale; '
* history of neurological disorder other than stroke;
* change in anti-spasticity medications in the last 6 months, and/or receipt of botulinum toxin in the paretic UE in the previous 4 months;
* elbow contracture greater than 10 degrees;
* inability to passively extend fingers while wrist is in neutral;
* other conditions or physical/mental attributes that may undermine safety and/or full participation in the study;
* bilateral hemiparesis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016H0339

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.