Applying Best Clinical Practices to Patients at High Risk of Respiratory Complications
NCT ID: NCT04263363
Last Updated: 2025-07-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
12248 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-18
2025-05-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Perform a retrospective analysis on data contained in the UCLA Perioperative Data Warehouse on the incidence of respiratory dysfunction in the post-operative care unit (PACU) before and after the introduction of sugammadex into clinical practice.
2. Develop and implement a clinical best practice pathway designed to prevent postoperative respiratory complications in higher risk patients (such as those with OSA or preexisting respiratory disease) using education and clinical decision support in patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improvement of Facial Nerve Monitoring in Parotid Surgery by Sugammadex
NCT02314234
Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine on Early Postoperative Pulmonary Function
NCT07309393
An Observational Study to Analyze the Prescription Pattern of Sugammadex and Its Effectiveness and Safety
NCT05788718
Optimizing Post-operative Recovery in Bariatric Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Outpatient Surgery: A Comparison of Sugammadex and Neostigmine
NCT04570150
Safety and Efficacy of Sugammadex (Org 25969, MK-8616) in Participants With or Having a Past History of Pulmonary Disease (19.4.308) (P05932) (MK-8616-017)
NCT00475215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Retrospective data analysis: The investigators will utilize the Perioperative Data Warehouse, a custom-built data warehouse, to study the effect of the introduction of sugammadex, a direct reversal agent for rocuronium, into clinical practice on time to "fitness for discharge" from the recovery room, as noted by the time the anesthesiologist places the discharge order, before and after intervention and postoperative respiratory dysfunction (as defined as duration of oxygen saturation below 90% in the PACU).
2. Creation and implementation of a pathway to prevent postoperative respiratory dysfunction: The investigators will design and implement a perioperative decision support system which will identify high-risk patients and provide best practice recommendations via electronic clinical decision support reminders.
Creation and implementation of a pathway to prevent postoperative respiratory dysfunction:
In order to improve outcomes for high-risk patients who receive general anesthesia and paralysis the investigators will design and implement a perioperative decision support system which will identify high-risk patients and provide best practice recommendations via electronic clinical decision support reminders. While the exact parameters of the pathway will be designed based upon feedback from a group of quality leaders in the department, in general the pathway will function as follows:
When the anesthesiologist completes the preoperative evaluation for a patient who is flagged as having either respiratory disease or OSA and will receive general anesthesia, the anesthesiologist will receive an alert reminding them of the best practice guidelines for pulmonary management in high-risk patients. As part of the study roll-out the investigators will present these guidelines with their quality committee, but anticipate that they will suggest 1) use of sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade if rocuronium was used 2) use of objective train of four monitoring throughout the case and to confirm reversal 3) use of a tidal volume of 6-8 cc/kg 4) use of at least 5 cmH2O of PEEP.
The investigators anticipate running the prospective portion of the study for a one year data collection period. Specifically, they will allow a one month "wash out" period for pathway go live, followed by one year of data collection during which the pathway is live.
STUDY PROCEDURES
Pathway Design
The design of the pathway will undergo a well-established process that is designed to ensure buy-in and support from a large variety of providers within the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at UCLA. The investigators will create a core group of individuals who represent key stakeholders in quality, informatics, and clinical decision making throughout our department. This group will be in charge of reviewing the existing literature and creating the pathway guidelines and associated decision support. The decision support will consist of preoperative alerts for high risk patients, intraoperative reminders for events such as ventilator settings and reversal as well as postoperative feedback on performance of identified best practices and outcomes. This pathway will include the recommendation of the use of sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade and use of objective train of four (TOF) monitoring in high-risk individuals.
This core group will then present the recommended pathway for approval to our quarterly Quality Council and then broader Faculty Meetings for approval. The investigators estimate that the total time for pathway design and creation will be approximately 6 months.
Pathway Implementation
After approval, the investigators will work with the EMR build team in order to ensure the necessary modification to the EMR. After the modifications are complete, the investigators will establish a "go-live" date. After an initial period during which the investigators will accommodate feedback and ensure that the modifications were made successfully, no further modifications to the respiratory pathway will be made. The investigators plan to keep this pathway in place for at least one year (the study period).
Data Collection and Analysis
As noted above, the team has the ability to automatically collect the data from the EMR for analysis purposes. After the one year implementation period investigators will extract the data elements noted above for the study period as well as an equivalent period prior to pathway implementation. The data will be analyzed for the overall application of best practices before and after as well as a change in primary and secondary outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CDS pathway
When the anesthesiologist completes the preoperative evaluation for a patient who is flagged as having either respiratory disease or OSA and will receive general anesthesia, the anesthesiologist will receive a pop-up window reminding them of the best practice guidelines for pulmonary management in high-risk patients. We anticipate that the pathway will suggest 1) use of sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade if rocuronium was used 2) use of objective train of four monitoring throughout the case and to confirm reversal 3) use of a tidal volume of 6-8 cc/kg 4) use of at least 5 cmH2O of PEEP
Sugammadex 100 MG/ML [Bridion]
Sugammadex administered to patients within the clinical best practice pathway.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sugammadex 100 MG/ML [Bridion]
Sugammadex administered to patients within the clinical best practice pathway.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who receive sugammadex from the specified study supply
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a preoperative glomerular filtration rate less than 30 or on hemodialysis
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the following: rocuronium, vecuronium, sugammadex, neostigmine or glycopyrrolate
* Patients with known neuromuscular disease
* Patients who remain intubated after surgery or leave the operating room with a tracheostomy in-situ
* Patients who did not receive reversal of neuromuscular blockade (with neostigmine in the pre-period or sugammadex in the post-period).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eilon Gabel, MD
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Anes-Respiratory Dysfunction
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.