The Effect of Hair Removal on Intraoperative Contamination

NCT ID: NCT04256928

Last Updated: 2020-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-15

Study Completion Date

2020-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial with the purpose of investigating, whether preoperative electrical clipping of body hair affects the risk of intraoperative contamination.

The primary investigators hypothesis is this: Preoperative electrical clipping of body hair in the operative field lowers the risk of intraoperative contamination.

200 male participants, 18 years or older, with a planned primary knee replacement surgery, will be enrolled.

During surgery, four microbiological samples will be taken from each participant.

The primary outcome is whether there is intraoperative contamination of the surgical site or not, determined by identification of any grown bacteria from the samples.

If this study finds, that the contamination rate is lowered by preoperative electrical clipping of body hair, it will provide a cost-effective method of reducing the risk of intraoperative contamination and consequent postoperative infection, a solid argument for a change of current guidelines for preoperative hair removal, and provide additional information pointing towards body hair as a possible explanation for the increased infection rate in men.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A late ph.d.-study conducted at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital has shown a 15 percentage difference in contamination rates when comparing participants who had their body hair removed preoperatively, and those who did not.

Based on the finds in the aforementioned study, the hypothesis for this study is that preoperative electrical clipping of body hair in the operative field lowers the risk of intraoperative contamination.

The purpose of this study is to investigate, whether preoperative electrical clipping of body hair affects the risk of intraoperative contamination.

A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial will be performed. The study population consists of 200 male patients, 18 years or older, with a planned primary knee replacement surgery. The study population consists of only male patients, since males generally have denser body hair and a higher contamination rate than females. Exclusion criteria include known skin disease, use of antibiotics 4 weeks prior to surgery, if patients due to mental reasons, a language barrier or other reasons are unable to participate in the study, as well as no body hair in the surgical field.

Participants will be randomized to either the intervention group (preoperative electrical clipping) or the control group (leaving the body hair intact) using a 1:1 randomization ratio. The randomization is performed electronically by a medical student or the operating surgeon and the pre-assessment consultation.

Clipping is performed by hospital staff on the day of surgery. The degree of body hair on both knees is photo-documented for all participants, for the intervention group after the clipping of body hair on the relevant knee has been performed.

During the surgery, biological material from every participant is collected as four microbiological samples, taken using Copan ESwabs. The first swab is taken before the skin is surgically prepared, the second immediately after incision of the skin, the third swab is taken just prior to the change of gloves performed before cementation of the prothesis, and the last swab is taken after closure of the joint capsule before closure of the skin. Samples will be collected at Orthopedic Departments of Gentofte Hospital. All samples will be sent to Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev Hospital, for culturing.The bacteria will be identified following Danish guidelines.

The material consists of culture results from all samples. The primary outcome is whether there is intraoperative contamination of the surgical site or not. This is determined by identification of any grown bacteria.The material will be statistically analyzed using the program R Studio. Since data is categorial, a chi-squared test will be performed to evaluate the significance of the possible difference of contamination rate in the two participant groups.

All possibilities for conducting the study are known to exist, as the method described above has previously been used in the PhD study conducted at the department: "Intraoperative microbial contamination, its prevention and its consequences for outcomes following knee replacement surgery- The ICON study".

Personal data is processed as part of the project. All handling and processing of personal data follows the Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act.

Data collected during the pre-assessment consultation will be entered directly into a database. Only data in this database will be available to the investigators conducting the study, for further analysis. Information about the microbiological samples and cultures will be entered into the database as well. All information in the database will be anonymized 2 years after collection of data is complete.

By consenting to participating in this study, participants also consent to the investigators conducting the study, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital and their representatives to be given direct access to the collected data. Consenting to participate also involves consenting that the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics are allowed direct access to all data collected, to facilitate their control with the project.

If this study finds, that the contamination rate is lowered by preoperative electrical clipping of body hair, it will not only provide a cost-effective method to reduce the risk of intraoperative contamination and consequent postoperative infection, but may also lead to a change of current guidelines to preoperative electrical clipping of body hair becoming a permanent practice. In addition, the study will confirm existing finds pointing towards body hair as a possible explanation for the increased infection rate in men.

A decrease in the incidence of infections will save patients from unpleasant and often prolonged consequences of infection, including pain, revisions, antibiotic treatments and, at worst, loss of mobility. In addition, fewer infections will lead to savings in the health care system, with the release of funds and beds, to the benefit of patients in general and the social economy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intraoperative Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized to either the intervention group (preoperative electrical clipping) clipping or the control group (leaving the body hair intact) using a 1:1 randomization ratio. The randomization is performed electronically by a medical student or the operating surgeon and the pre-assessment consultation.

Hair removal is performed with an electric clipper. Clipping is performed by hospital staff on the day of surgery. The degree of body hair on both knees is photo-documented for all participants, for the intervention group after the clipping of body hair on the relevant knee has been performed.

4 microbiological samples will be taken during surgery from each participant using Copan ESwabs.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

This group of participants will have any body hair in the operative field clipped with an electrical clipper by hospital personnel, during preparation for planned surgery.

4 microbiological samples will be taken from all participants in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preoperative electrical clipping

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Body hair in the operative field will be clipped with an electrical clipper by hospital personnel during preparation to planned surgery.

Control group

This group of participants serve as the control group. Any body hair in the operative field is left intact.

4 microbiological samples will be taken from all participants in this group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preoperative electrical clipping

Body hair in the operative field will be clipped with an electrical clipper by hospital personnel during preparation to planned surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Planned primary knee replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Known skin disease
* Use of antibiotics 4 weeks prior to surgery
* If patients due to mental reasons, a language barrier or other reasons are unable to participate in the study
* No body hair in the surgical field
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ditte Harder

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ditte Harder, Student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Ortopædkirurgisk Afdeling T

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ortopædkirurgisk Afdeling T, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ditte Harder, Student

Role: CONTACT

+4538673364

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ditte Harder, Student

Role: primary

+4538673364

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hesselvig AB, Bjarnsholt T, Arpi M, Madsen F, Odgaard A, group ObotIs. The use of iodine impregnated incision drape in knee arthroplasty surgery - a prospective, randomized trial.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gallo J, Kolar M, Novotny R, Rihakova P, Ticha V. Pathogenesis of prosthesis-related infection. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2003 Nov;147(1):27-35. doi: 10.5507/bp.2003.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15034602 (View on PubMed)

Byrne AM, Morris S, McCarthy T, Quinlan W, O'byrne JM. Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0121-z. Epub 2006 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16586132 (View on PubMed)

Jonsson EO, Johannesdottir H, Robertsson O, Mogensen B. Bacterial contamination of the wound during primary total hip and knee replacement. Median 13 years of follow-up of 90 replacements. Acta Orthop. 2014 Apr;85(2):159-64. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.899848.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24650025 (View on PubMed)

Al-Maiyah M, Hill D, Bajwa A, Slater S, Patil P, Port A, Gregg PJ. Bacterial contaminants and antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Sep;87(9):1256-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15685.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16129753 (View on PubMed)

Webster J, Alghamdi A. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 22;2015(4):CD006353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25901509 (View on PubMed)

Falk-Brynhildsen K, Friberg O, Soderquist B, Nilsson UG. Bacterial colonization of the skin following aseptic preoperative preparation and impact of the use of plastic adhesive drapes. Biol Res Nurs. 2013 Apr;15(2):242-8. doi: 10.1177/1099800411430381. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22278031 (View on PubMed)

Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Wolfsberg TG, Turner ML, Segre JA. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1043-50. doi: 10.1101/gr.075549.107. Epub 2008 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18502944 (View on PubMed)

Arnold WV, Shirtliff ME, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms and periprosthetic infections. Instr Course Lect. 2014;63:385-91.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24720323 (View on PubMed)

Aboltins C, Daffy J, Choong P, Stanley P. Current concepts in the management of prosthetic joint infection. Intern Med J. 2014 Sep;44(9):834-40. doi: 10.1111/imj.12510.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24942508 (View on PubMed)

Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Prosthetic joint infections: update in diagnosis and treatment. Swiss Med Wkly. 2005 Apr 30;135(17-18):243-51. doi: 10.4414/smw.2005.10934.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15965826 (View on PubMed)

Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Marenbach D, Lang C, Patzelt A, Ulrich M, Maltusch A, Terhorst D, Stockfleth E, Sterry W, Lademann J. Distribution of bacteria in the epidermal layers and hair follicles of the human skin. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(6):305-11. doi: 10.1159/000328728. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21757977 (View on PubMed)

Jose B, Dignon A. Is there a relationship between preoperative shaving (hair removal) and surgical site infection? J Perioper Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1750458913023001-203.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23413532 (View on PubMed)

Pan A, Ambrosini L, Patroni A, Soavi L, Signorini L, Carosi G, Santini C; Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Infezioni in Cardiochirurgia Study Group. Adherence to surgical site infection guidelines in Italian cardiac surgery units. Infection. 2009 Apr;37(2):148-52. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7474-8. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19308319 (View on PubMed)

Broekman ML, van Beijnum J, Peul WC, Regli L. Neurosurgery and shaving: what's the evidence? J Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;115(4):670-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS102003. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21721875 (View on PubMed)

Lefebvre A, Saliou P, Lucet JC, Mimoz O, Keita-Perse O, Grandbastien B, Bruyere F, Boisrenoult P, Lepelletier D, Aho-Glele LS; French Study Group for the Preoperative Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. Preoperative hair removal and surgical site infections: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hosp Infect. 2015 Oct;91(2):100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26320612 (View on PubMed)

Kjonniksen I, Andersen BM, Sondenaa VG, Segadal L. Preoperative hair removal--a systematic literature review. AORN J. 2002 May;75(5):928-38, 940. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61457-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12063942 (View on PubMed)

Shi D, Yao Y, Yu W. Comparison of preoperative hair removal methods for the reduction of surgical site infections: a meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):2907-2914. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13661. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27875033 (View on PubMed)

Tanner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004122.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16856029 (View on PubMed)

Wilson VanVoorhis CR, Morgan BL. Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2007;3:43-50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

70136

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.