Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-03
2021-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Supraspinatus Tendon Assessment After 448kilohertz Radiofrequency Stimulation in a Sporty Population.
NCT04273633
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Approach Using High Intensity Laser Therapy
NCT02971215
Comparison of Manual Therapy Versus Radial Shock Waves in the Shoulder Pain Treatment
NCT06587399
Effectiveness of Two Electrotherapy Techniques to Treat Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT02110030
Electro-massage in Subjects With Subacromial Pain Syndrome
NCT03338283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Symptoms of pathologies of subacromial syndrome, where, regardless of origin, pain is the number one symptom for the patient, which emanates functional impairment and the impact on quality of life.
Among the non-pharmacological treatments of subacromial syndrome, a systematic review concludes that the first line of intervention should be a therapeutic exercise program. In many cases, this is usually accompanied by the application of electrophysical agents (short wave, laser, etc.). A recent study has shown that the application of Short Wave Radio Frequency improved pain in people with subacromial syndrome. The current frequency that is applied in the short wave is 27.12 MHz, however, there are other relatively new forms of radiofrequency in which a frequency less than 1 MHz is used. These are beginning to be used in clinical practice and recently have shown positive results related to pain and functionality of musculoskeletal pathologies such as knee osteoarthritis. In these two clinical trials, what is called Resistive Capacitive Monopolar Radio Frequency (RFCR) was used, the frequency of which was 448 KHz and 485KHz respectively, much lower than the frequency used in Shortwave. The RFCR has a potential advantage since it is applied with electrodes directly on the skin and is not transmitted in the air unlike the Short Wave.
Based on the few clinical trials in people with pathology and the physiological effects evidenced in healthy people and in vitro preclinical studies, it is considered pertinent to carry out the present investigation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thermal CRMRF
9 sessions in 3 week of Thermal CRMRF: The power of the RFCR equipment in this intervention will be 35 VA in capacitive method (10% of the maximum power of the equipment) and 30 W in the resistive method (15% of the maximum power of the equipment) in 3 week (3 sessions a week on alternate days) + 15 sessions in 3 week of exercise protocol (5 sessiones a week).
In Thermal CRMRF it will be necessary to adapt to the patient's thermal sensitivity
Thermal 448 kHz Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency
Thermal Application of 448 kHz monopolar radio frequency in capacitive and resistive method
Subthermal CRMRF
9 sessions in 3 week of Subthermal CRMRF: The power of the RFCR equipment in this intervention will be 7 VA in capacitive method (2% of the maximum power of the equipment) and 4 W in the resistive method (2% of the maximum power of the equipment) in 3 week (3 sessions a week on alternate days) + 15 sessions in 3 week of exercise protocol (5 sessions a week).
Subthermal 448 kHz Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency
Subthermal Application of 448 kHz monopolar radio frequency in capacitive and resistive method
Sham CRMRF
9 sessions in 3 week of sham stimulation: The application will be carried out in the same way as in the experimental groups, but in this case the manufacturer will introduce a simulated stimulation protocol so that the device does not emit current + 15 sessions in 3 week of exercise protocol (5 sessiones a week).
Sham stimulation
a simulated stimulation protocol so that the device does not emit current
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thermal 448 kHz Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency
Thermal Application of 448 kHz monopolar radio frequency in capacitive and resistive method
Subthermal 448 kHz Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency
Subthermal Application of 448 kHz monopolar radio frequency in capacitive and resistive method
Sham stimulation
a simulated stimulation protocol so that the device does not emit current
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) less than or equal to 7.
* Positive Neer and Hawkins test.
Exclusion Criteria
* Fibromyalgia
* Adhesive capsulitis
* Be receiving physiotherapeutic treatment or have received it previously for this pathology one month before the start of treatment.
* Patients with alterations of thermal sensitivity.
* Derived from the absolute and relative contraindications of CRMRF:
* Pacemaker
* Thrombophlebitis
* Pregnancy
* Skin disorders (recent wounds or burns)
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado
OTHER
Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
OTHER
Indiba S.A.
UNKNOWN
University of Castilla-La Mancha
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juan Avendaño-Coy, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Castilla La Mancha University
Javier Aceituno-Gómez, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital General Universitario Nuestra Señora del Prado
Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
448 kHz CRMRF UCLM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.