Efficacy of Electrotherapy in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT01073956
Last Updated: 2011-07-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electro-massage in Subjects With Subacromial Pain Syndrome
NCT03338283
Effectiveness of Two Electrotherapy Techniques to Treat Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT02110030
Influence of Interferential Current Therapy in the Treatment of Individuals With Shoulder Impact Syndrome: A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial.
NCT02964819
Short-term Effects of Thoracic Manipulation in Shoulder Impingement
NCT02083796
Comparison of Manual Therapy Versus Radial Shock Waves in the Shoulder Pain Treatment
NCT06587399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ultrasound is no more beneficial than exercise alone. Likewise, the results of some more recent studies evaluating the application of ultrasound alone versus placebo, showed that ultrasound alone in physiotherapy treatment of shoulder pain is only effective in patients with calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. All the authors, however, suggest that effectiveness can vary, depending on application conditions, dosage and timing.
The primary objective of the trial is to analyze the efficacy of electrotherapy treatment (monopolar radiofrequency or ultrasound) coadjuvant to mobility and exercise therapy in the reduction of pain intensity in subacromial impingement syndrome.
The secondary objectives of this study are to determine the differences between three intervention groups: monopolar radiofrequency, ultrasound and inactive radiofrequency, in improvement of performance status, quality of life and global impression of improvement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inactive electrotherapy
Inactive electrotherapy is applied to the painful points
Inactive electrotherapy
Inactive electrotherapy, inactive head, dosage 0 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound electrotherapy is applied to the painful points
Ultrasonic therapy
Pulsed 1 MHz ultrasound at 2 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital-groove
Monopolar radiofrequency
Monopolar radiofrequency electrotherapy is applied to the painful points
Medium-wave 448 kHz therapy
0.5 MHz radiofrequency for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medium-wave 448 kHz therapy
0.5 MHz radiofrequency for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove
Ultrasonic therapy
Pulsed 1 MHz ultrasound at 2 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital-groove
Inactive electrotherapy
Inactive electrotherapy, inactive head, dosage 0 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Shoulder pain secondary to subacromial impingement syndrome
* Pain at rest and/or with free movement and/or with movement against resistance with a score on the visual analogue scale of 3 or higher.
* Documented X-ray (XR), ultrasound (US) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of cuff injury involving oedema, tendonitis, fibrosis or torn tendon.
* Potentially available for the next six months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Radiological findings of tumour lesions, avascular necrosis, glenoid development defects, acromial bone, severe degenerative signs affecting inter-articular space and fractures
* Limited range of passive movement with capsular pattern
* Recent history of trauma (contusion, falls or sudden jarring)
* Ischaemic cardiopathy in subacute phase
* History of more than five infiltrations and/or shoulder surgery
* History of rehabilitation treatment for the same reason in the last 12 months
* Cognitive deficit, psychiatric alterations or behavioural disorders that might compromise the patient's collaboration
* Unsuitable for electrotherapy: pregnancy, epilepsy, pacemaker, osteosynthesis, undergoing treatment with Sintrom
* Patients in litigation or in the process of making work-related claims
* Failure to understand Spanish
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corporación Fisiogestión S.A.
UNKNOWN
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
OTHER
Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques
OTHER
Fundacio Espai Salut
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Corporación Fisiogestión
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Conxita Closa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Corporación Fisiogestión S.A.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto de Rehabilitación Tres Torres -IR3T
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Centro de Recuperación Funcional (CRF)
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Green S, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FES-2009-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.