Efficacy of Electrotherapy in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT01073956

Last Updated: 2011-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of electrotherapy as a coadjuvant in mobility and exercise treatment in the reduction of pain intensity in subacromial impingement syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Among the different diagnoses covered by the concept of shoulder pain, the most common is subacromial impingement syndrome, which represents 44%-60% of the total.Specific supervised exercises obtain improvements in the range of movement and muscular function by restoring the shoulder's mobility and stability. Physiotherapeutic options include several electrotherapy techniques.

Ultrasound is no more beneficial than exercise alone. Likewise, the results of some more recent studies evaluating the application of ultrasound alone versus placebo, showed that ultrasound alone in physiotherapy treatment of shoulder pain is only effective in patients with calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. All the authors, however, suggest that effectiveness can vary, depending on application conditions, dosage and timing.

The primary objective of the trial is to analyze the efficacy of electrotherapy treatment (monopolar radiofrequency or ultrasound) coadjuvant to mobility and exercise therapy in the reduction of pain intensity in subacromial impingement syndrome.

The secondary objectives of this study are to determine the differences between three intervention groups: monopolar radiofrequency, ultrasound and inactive radiofrequency, in improvement of performance status, quality of life and global impression of improvement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inactive electrotherapy

Inactive electrotherapy is applied to the painful points

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Inactive electrotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inactive electrotherapy, inactive head, dosage 0 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound electrotherapy is applied to the painful points

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasonic therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pulsed 1 MHz ultrasound at 2 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital-groove

Monopolar radiofrequency

Monopolar radiofrequency electrotherapy is applied to the painful points

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medium-wave 448 kHz therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

0.5 MHz radiofrequency for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medium-wave 448 kHz therapy

0.5 MHz radiofrequency for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasonic therapy

Pulsed 1 MHz ultrasound at 2 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital-groove

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inactive electrotherapy

Inactive electrotherapy, inactive head, dosage 0 W/cm2 for 10 minutes. At SPS insertion and bicipital groove.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Monopolar radiofrequency Ultrasound electrotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women over 18 years of age
* Shoulder pain secondary to subacromial impingement syndrome
* Pain at rest and/or with free movement and/or with movement against resistance with a score on the visual analogue scale of 3 or higher.
* Documented X-ray (XR), ultrasound (US) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of cuff injury involving oedema, tendonitis, fibrosis or torn tendon.
* Potentially available for the next six months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented US and/or MRI evidence of complete tearing of the cuff and clinical inability to lift the arm (drop arm sign)
* Radiological findings of tumour lesions, avascular necrosis, glenoid development defects, acromial bone, severe degenerative signs affecting inter-articular space and fractures
* Limited range of passive movement with capsular pattern
* Recent history of trauma (contusion, falls or sudden jarring)
* Ischaemic cardiopathy in subacute phase
* History of more than five infiltrations and/or shoulder surgery
* History of rehabilitation treatment for the same reason in the last 12 months
* Cognitive deficit, psychiatric alterations or behavioural disorders that might compromise the patient's collaboration
* Unsuitable for electrotherapy: pregnancy, epilepsy, pacemaker, osteosynthesis, undergoing treatment with Sintrom
* Patients in litigation or in the process of making work-related claims
* Failure to understand Spanish
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corporación Fisiogestión S.A.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundacio Espai Salut

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Corporación Fisiogestión

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Conxita Closa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Corporación Fisiogestión S.A.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto de Rehabilitación Tres Torres -IR3T

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Centro de Recuperación Funcional (CRF)

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Green S, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12804509 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FES-2009-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.