HVPG-Guided Therapy vs Carvedilol Plus Endotherapy for the Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding in Cirrhotic Patients

NCT ID: NCT04254822

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of cirrhosis, associated with a hospital mortality rate of 10%-20%. Surviving patients are at high risk for recurrent hemorrhage. For these reasons, management should be directed at its prevention. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EBL) in combination with non-selective β-blocker (NSBB) therapy is the recommended first line therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) is the most effective method to prevent rebleeding, however, it is burdened with increased hepatic encephalopathy and deterioration of liver function in patients with advanced cirrhosis. So TIPS placement forms an alternative if first line therapy fails.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently the best available method to evaluate the presence and severity of portal hypertension. Patients who experience a reduction in HVPG of ≥20% or to \<12mmHg in response to drug therapy are defined as 'responders'. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are HVPG responders. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than drug therapy. This suggests that pharmacological therapy is the cornerstone of combination therapy. Adding EBL may not be the optimal approach to improve the outcome of HVPG nonresponders and HVPG non-responders are a special high-risk population that may benefit from a more aggressive approach, such as an early decision for TIPS. It recently was shown that TIPS placement within 72 hours after acute bleeding not only prevented recurrent bleeding but also improved survival. These raise the question of whether ligation together with NSBB should remain the first choice for elective secondary prophylaxis.

Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare whether HVPG-guided therapy is superior to standard combination therapy for the prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Cirrhoses Variceal Hemorrhage Esophageal Varices

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HVPG-guided therapy

HVPG will be determined before randomization. In this arm, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) receive carvedilol whereas nonresponders receive TIPS.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The TIPS procedures will be performed by experienced interventional radiologists. polytetrafluroethylene-covered stents were used with initial balloon dilatation to 8 mm, aiming for a decrease in portal-venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg.

Carvedilol

Intervention Type DRUG

Carvedilol will be started at least 5 days after the index bleeding, unless a contraindication was present. Carvedilol will be start with 6.25 mg once a day and after 3 days increase to 6.25 mg twice-daily (the maximal dose was 12.5 mg/day). Systolic arterial blood pressure should not decrease \<90 mmHg.

Standard therapy

In this group, both responders and nonresponders will receive combination therapy of carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation as first-line therapy. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS will considered.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carvedilol

Intervention Type DRUG

Carvedilol will be started at least 5 days after the index bleeding, unless a contraindication was present. Carvedilol will be start with 6.25 mg once a day and after 3 days increase to 6.25 mg twice-daily (the maximal dose was 12.5 mg/day). Systolic arterial blood pressure should not decrease \<90 mmHg.

Endoscopic variceal ligation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For endoscopic variceal ligation, the first elective session will be carried out within 7 days of randomisation. Then EBL sessions were scheduled every 10-14 days until variceal eradication (disappearance of varices or being too small to be sucked in the banding device).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

The TIPS procedures will be performed by experienced interventional radiologists. polytetrafluroethylene-covered stents were used with initial balloon dilatation to 8 mm, aiming for a decrease in portal-venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Carvedilol

Carvedilol will be started at least 5 days after the index bleeding, unless a contraindication was present. Carvedilol will be start with 6.25 mg once a day and after 3 days increase to 6.25 mg twice-daily (the maximal dose was 12.5 mg/day). Systolic arterial blood pressure should not decrease \<90 mmHg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Endoscopic variceal ligation

For endoscopic variceal ligation, the first elective session will be carried out within 7 days of randomisation. Then EBL sessions were scheduled every 10-14 days until variceal eradication (disappearance of varices or being too small to be sucked in the banding device).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
* History of esophageal variceal bleeding confirmed by endoscopy
* Time interval between index bleeding and randomization \> 5 days.
* Child-Pugh score \< 12,MELD score\<19

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical manifestation of active bleeding
* Gastric variceal bleeding: GOV2,IGV1 or IGV2
* Degree of main portal vein thrombosis \> 50%
* Refractory ascites
* Contraindications of TIPS
* Contraindications of NSBB
* Budd-Chiari Syndrome
* Malignancy tumor
* Uncontrolled infections
* History of portal-systemic shunt surgery
* HIV
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
* Poor incompliance
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tie Jun

Primary investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jun Tie, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Air Force Military Medical University, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fourth Military Medical University

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jun Tie, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

+862984771537

Hui Chen, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

+862984771537

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jun Tie, MD. Ph.D.

Role: primary

+862984771537

Hui Chen, MD. Ph.D.

Role: backup

+862984771537

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20192149-F-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.