EUS-guided Obturation of High Risk Gastric Varices Versus Standard Endoscopic Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04222127

Last Updated: 2020-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastric varices occur in patients with portal hypertension, mostly secondary to liver cirrhosis. Although they bleed less frequently than oesophageal varices, gastric variceal bleeding tends to be more severe with reported higher mortality.

Endoscopic variceal obliteration (EVO) by direct endoscopic injection (DEI) using tissue adhesives like glue, CYA or histoacryl demonstrated higher hemostasis and lower bleeding rates compared to band ligation or sclerotherapy. Nevertheless, CYA treatment is known to be associated with significant adverse events like para-variceal injection, hemorrhage from post injection ulcer, needle sticking in the varix, intra-peritoneal injection leading to peritonitis and adherence of the glue to the endoscope, fever, embolization into the renal vein, IVC, pulmonary or systemic vessels.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers unique access to abdominal arterial and venous vasculature. This has had the most clinical impact on the treatment of gastroesophageal varices, where EUS may play a role both in the management and can deliver therapy in the form of glue injection, endovascular coil placement or a combination of the two. EUS enables an assessment using Doppler to confirm vessel obliteration after treatment. However, targeting the perforating feeder vessel rather than the varix lumen itself may theoretically minimize the amount of CYA needed to achieve obliteration of GVs and thereby reduce the risk of embolization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single-centre, pilot randomized trial study that includes 42 patients with gastric varices that will be classified according to the Sarin and Kumar classification into GOV II or IGV I with recently bleeding GV \& high-risk GV (defined by Baveno VI consensus for primary prophylaxis).

Eligible patients will be randomized in 2 groups using computer-generated random number sequences using excel software in concealed envelopes with block randomization design. Group I will undergo EUS-guided CYA injection at entrance of perforator veins. Group II will undergo DEI of CYA.

Each patient will be subjected to :

* Written informed consent will be obtained from each patient, including a discussion on the procedure.
* Clinical assessment including history taking and physical examination
* Routine laboratory investigations including complete blood picture and serum creatinine.
* Liver function profile (serum bilirubin, AST, ALT , albumin and prothrombin time).
* The severity of underlying disease will be assessed by the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP) based on serum albumin, bilirubin, prothrombin time, the presence of ascites and encephalopathy.
* All procedures will be performed under deep sedation or general anesthesia in the left lateral position.
* Intravenous antibiotics will be administered to all patients prior to the endoscopic procedure to minimize the risk of secondary bacterial infection. Oral or intravenous antibiotics will be continued for at least 3 days following variceal injection.

* Endoscopic procedure and technique:
* Standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be performed in order to classify the varices according to the classification of Sarin and Kumar. Only high risk GOV II and IGV I varices (\>10 mm) will be included.
* EUS examination will be done in all patients with a Pentax linear Echoendoscope EG3870UTK (PENTAX medical, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a Hitachi Avius ultrasound system (Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). All EUS examinations will be done by two endosonographers. The echoendoscope will be positioned in the distal esophagus at the level of the cardia to visualize the gastric fundus and intramural varices.
* EUS will be used to display the vascular anatomy, in particular the feeding vein. GVs will be classified endosonographically according to Boustière et al which considered size of GVs and gastric wall abnormalities :

1: Size of GVs:
* Grade 0 (none)
* Grade 1 (small or non-confluent varies \< 5 mm)
* Grade 2 (large or confluent varices ≥ 5 mm) 2: Abnormalities of gastric wall:

1. Grade 0 (none)
2. Grade 1 (thickening and brilliance of the third hyperechogenic layer with or without fine internal anechogenic structures).
3. Grade 2 (visible vessels in the third layer which deform the entire wall, with penetrating varices).
* EUS-guided injection of CYA will be done at entrance of of the varix or the perforator veins when identifiable using a mixture (1:1) of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate \& lipidol using 19G EUS-FNA needle in Group I, or DEI of CYA in Group II.

* Follow-up after endoscopy:

After the procedure, patients will be observed for 2 hours in the recovery room before being discharged. Endoscopic examination and Doppler EUS will be repeated in all patients at 3, and 6 months post-procedure (or sooner with recurrent bleeding) to confirm eradication. Hemostasis, early post treatment bleeding and late post treatment bleeding will be recorded according to Baveno VI concensus.

GVs will be considered obliterated by direct endoscopy when not visible and/or hardened to catheter palpation. Obliteration by Doppler EUS will be considered by visualization of clot and absence of Doppler flow within the gastric wall. Repeat injection will be performed in the absence of obliteration. Direct endoscopic and Doppler EUS examinations will be repeated again at 3, and 6 months after each injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Varix

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS-guided injection of CYA of GVs

EUS-guided injection of CYA will be done at entrance of of the varix or the perforator veins when identifiable using a mixture (1:1) of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate \& lipidol using 19G EUS-FNA needle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EUS guided injection of gastric varices by CYA

Intervention Type OTHER

EUS-guided injection of CYA will be done at entrance of of the varix or the perforator veins when identifiable using a mixture (1:1) of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate \& lipidol using 19G EUS-FNA needle

Direct endoscopic injection of CYA of GVs

Direct endoscopic injection of CYA of the gastric varix using standard endoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Direct endoscopic injection of gastric varices by CYA

Intervention Type OTHER

Direct endoscopic injection of gastric varix by CYA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS guided injection of gastric varices by CYA

EUS-guided injection of CYA will be done at entrance of of the varix or the perforator veins when identifiable using a mixture (1:1) of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate \& lipidol using 19G EUS-FNA needle

Intervention Type OTHER

Direct endoscopic injection of gastric varices by CYA

Direct endoscopic injection of gastric varix by CYA

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High risk GOV II and IGV I varices (\>10 mm) on initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy
* Recent bleeding and primary prophylaxis
* Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo alternative therapies for GV \[such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or surgery\], or prior TIPS had failed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to give informed consent for the procedure.
* Concurrent hepatorenal syndrome and/or multiorgan failure.
* Presence of HCC \&/or portal vein thrombosis.
* Previous endoscopic treatment for GVs.
* Platelet count less than 50,000/ml or International Normalized Rate (INR) \>2
* Esophageal stricture
* Previous esophageal or gastric surgery.
* Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fady S Karam, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura University

Ahmed Y Altonbary, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mansoura University

Hazim H Almenshawy, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mansoura University

Ayman A Aldosoky, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mansoura University

Seham M Seif, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mansoura University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Specialized Medical hospital

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fady S Karam, Master

Role: CONTACT

+201028838396

Ahmed Y Altonbary

Role: CONTACT

01005100091

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fady S Karam, Master

Role: primary

+201028838396

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Romero-Castro R, Pellicer-Bautista FJ, Jimenez-Saenz M, Marcos-Sanchez F, Caunedo-Alvarez A, Ortiz-Moyano C, Gomez-Parra M, Herrerias-Gutierrez JM. EUS-guided injection of cyanoacrylate in perforating feeding veins in gastric varices: results in 5 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17643723 (View on PubMed)

Wang AJ, Li BM, Zheng XL, Shu X, Zhu X. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of esophagogastric varices. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Jul-Aug;5(4):218-24. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.187840.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27503152 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MD.19.03.157

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.