Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
8 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-04-04
2024-06-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interventional Devascularization Plus HVPG-Guided Carvedilol Therapy vs TIPS
NCT04198259
TIPS in Fundal Variceal Bleeding (the TFB Study)
NCT02364297
"Early TIPS" Versus Glue Obliteration to Prevent Rebleeding From Gastric Varices
NCT03705078
Endoscopic Sclerotherapy and/or Ligation Versus Portacaval Shunt for Bleeding Gastric Varices
NCT00820781
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Balloon Occluded/Plug Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration With Endoscopic Variceal Obturation for Primary Prophylaxis of Gastric Varices With Large Spontaneous Shunt
NCT05677230
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditionally, TIPS and transvenous obliteration have evolved in relative isolation as different philosophical strategies to address VH. TIPS is more commonly utilized in North America and Europe, where portal decompression with or without adjunctive embolization of varices has been a mainstay of endovascular strategy. Conversely, transvenous obliteration evolved in Asia as a direct treatment of VH by obliterating GEVs (particularly GVs) via sclerosis. These approaches were previously viewed as in conflict with one another as obliteration closes GVs but aggravates portal hypertension, whereas TIPS is designed to reduce portal hypertension. Increasingly, however, TIPS and transvenous obliteration are viewed as complimentary procedures that can be combined to reduce bleeding risk and ameliorate sequelae of portal hypertension. Performed together, TIPS and transvenous obliteration result in the elimination of high flow GVs that are at risk for life threatening hemorrhage, with replacement by a man-made endovascular created portosystemic shunt that is not at risk for rupture as well as reduction the risk for post-obliteration EV aggravation, ascites formation, or development of ectopic varices.
Yet, despite a strong mechanistic basis for their combination, there are few studies investigating the effectiveness of combined TIPS plus transvenous obliteration. Thus, the overarching goal of this single center prospective pilot study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of combined TIPS creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of GVs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TIPS-obliteration
Patients undergoing combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs).
TIPS-obliteration
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) decompression of portal hypertension coupled with transvenous obliteration of gastric varices (GVs).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TIPS-obliteration
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) decompression of portal hypertension coupled with transvenous obliteration of gastric varices (GVs).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to provide written consent
* Endoscopically proven acute or recurrent VH from GVs, or high risk GVs
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior endovascular obliteration procedure
* Elevated heart pressures (left or right)
* Heart failure or severe valvular insufficiency
* Severe pulmonary hypertension
* Rapidly progressive liver failure
* Severe or uncontrolled hepatic encephalopathy
* Uncontrolled systemic infection or sepsis
* Unrelieved biliary obstruction
* Polycystic liver disease
* Extensive primary or metastatic hepatic malignancy
* Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ron Gaba
Associate Professor of Radiology & Pathology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ron C Gaba, M.D. M.S.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saad WE, Wagner CC, Lippert A, Al-Osaimi A, Davies MG, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF, Caldwell S. Protective value of TIPS against the development of hydrothorax/ascites and upper gastrointestinal bleeding after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO). Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1612-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.232. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Gaba RC. Retrograde-Antegrade Accelerated Trap Obliteration: A Modified Approach to Transvenous Eradication of Gastric Varices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):291-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-0156
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.