TIPS Plus Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices

NCT ID: NCT04044248

Last Updated: 2024-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-04

Study Completion Date

2024-06-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Variceal hemorrhage (VH) from gastric varices (GVs) results in significant morbidity and mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. In cases of acute bleeding, refractory bleeding, or high risk GVs, the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation and transvenous variceal obliteration procedures have used to treat GVs. While these techniques are effective, each is associated with limitations, including non-trivial rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy rates for TIPS and aggravation of esophageal varices, development of new or worsening ascites, and formation of difficult to treat ectopic varices for transvenous obliteration. Increasingly, however, TIPS and transvenous obliteration are viewed as complimentary procedures that can be combined to reduce bleeding risk and ameliorate sequelae of portal hypertension. Yet, despite a strong mechanistic basis for their combination, there are few studies investigating the combined effectiveness of TIPS plus transvenous obliteration. Thus, the aim of this single center prospective pilot study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of combined TIPS creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of GVs, with the overall goal of improving the clinical outcomes of patients with VH related to GVs. The work proposed could lead to important advances in the treatment of bleeding complications due to liver cirrhosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Liver cirrhosis-or scarring of the liver-occurs with a worldwide prevalence approximating 4.5-9.5%, affecting hundreds of millions of people. Cirrhosis results in 2% of all global mortality, approximating 1 million deaths per year, and affects more than 600,000 persons in the United States. Variceal hemorrhage (VH) from gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gastric varices (GVs) occur in 5-33% of patients with cirrhotic liver disease and have a bleeding incidence of 25% within 2-years of development, 36% within 3-years, and 44% within 5-years. GVs are associated with high mortality rates approximating 25% at 2-years. First-line therapy in patients who have not bled includes preventative pharmaceuticals, while acute bleeding is typically treated with vasoconstrictive agents and endoscopic variceal ligation or sclerotherapy. In cases of acute hemorrhage, refractory bleeding, or high risk GVs, Interventional Radiology (IR) guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation is recommended to decompress varices and divert blood flow through a controlled synthetic conduit. In the modern era, TIPS is associated with initial GV bleeding control in greater than 90% of cases. However, GV rebleeding rates after TIPS are non-trivial, widely ranging between 13-53%. Moreover, GVs are widely thought to remain patent and sustain bleeding at low portosystemic pressure gradients (PSGs), as is the case after TIPS. In addition, TIPS can also contribute to high rates hepatic encephalopathy (HE) due to increased portosystemic shunting. Recently, transvenous obliteration techniques-including balloon-occluded retrograde (BRTO) and antegrade (BATO) transvenous obliteration as well as more recent adaptations including coil- (CARTO) and plug-assisted (PARTO) retrograde transvenous obliteration-have been developed with the intent of directly eradicating GVs. While obliteration techniques are associated with high technical success rates approximating 91-100% and low rebleeding incidence less than 5%, the worsened portal hypertension that follows from GV closure results in adverse side effects, including aggravation of esophageal varices (EVs) in 33% of patients, development of new or worsening of ascites in 10% of patients, and formation of difficult to treat ectopic varices.

Traditionally, TIPS and transvenous obliteration have evolved in relative isolation as different philosophical strategies to address VH. TIPS is more commonly utilized in North America and Europe, where portal decompression with or without adjunctive embolization of varices has been a mainstay of endovascular strategy. Conversely, transvenous obliteration evolved in Asia as a direct treatment of VH by obliterating GEVs (particularly GVs) via sclerosis. These approaches were previously viewed as in conflict with one another as obliteration closes GVs but aggravates portal hypertension, whereas TIPS is designed to reduce portal hypertension. Increasingly, however, TIPS and transvenous obliteration are viewed as complimentary procedures that can be combined to reduce bleeding risk and ameliorate sequelae of portal hypertension. Performed together, TIPS and transvenous obliteration result in the elimination of high flow GVs that are at risk for life threatening hemorrhage, with replacement by a man-made endovascular created portosystemic shunt that is not at risk for rupture as well as reduction the risk for post-obliteration EV aggravation, ascites formation, or development of ectopic varices.

Yet, despite a strong mechanistic basis for their combination, there are few studies investigating the effectiveness of combined TIPS plus transvenous obliteration. Thus, the overarching goal of this single center prospective pilot study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of combined TIPS creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of GVs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cirrhosis, Liver Hypertension, Portal Esophageal and Gastric Varices Bleeding Gastric Encephalopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TIPS-obliteration

Patients undergoing combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs).

TIPS-obliteration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) decompression of portal hypertension coupled with transvenous obliteration of gastric varices (GVs).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TIPS-obliteration

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) decompression of portal hypertension coupled with transvenous obliteration of gastric varices (GVs).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged ≥ 18 years
* Ability to provide written consent
* Endoscopically proven acute or recurrent VH from GVs, or high risk GVs

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior indwelling TIPS
* Prior endovascular obliteration procedure
* Elevated heart pressures (left or right)
* Heart failure or severe valvular insufficiency
* Severe pulmonary hypertension
* Rapidly progressive liver failure
* Severe or uncontrolled hepatic encephalopathy
* Uncontrolled systemic infection or sepsis
* Unrelieved biliary obstruction
* Polycystic liver disease
* Extensive primary or metastatic hepatic malignancy
* Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ron Gaba

Associate Professor of Radiology & Pathology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ron C Gaba, M.D. M.S.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saad WE, Wagner CC, Lippert A, Al-Osaimi A, Davies MG, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF, Caldwell S. Protective value of TIPS against the development of hydrothorax/ascites and upper gastrointestinal bleeding after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO). Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1612-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.232. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23939627 (View on PubMed)

Gaba RC. Retrograde-Antegrade Accelerated Trap Obliteration: A Modified Approach to Transvenous Eradication of Gastric Varices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):291-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.004.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28110759 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-0156

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.