Efficacy and Safety of Variceal Embolization Combined With Partial Splenic Artery Embolization for Variceal Bleeding in Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein.

NCT ID: NCT07310316

Last Updated: 2025-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The management of variceal bleeding in patients with cavernous transformation of portal vein (CTPV) generally adheres to the principles applied to cirrhotic portal hypertension, including pharmacological therapy, endoscopic intervention, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and surgery. However, the distinct hemodynamic profile caused by portal vein occlusion in CTPV introduces specific therapeutic challenges: 1. Conventional pharmacological and endoscopic treatments often yield suboptimal outcomes. 2. Splenectomy with periesophagogastric devascularization is associated with significant complication rates and elevated perioperative mortality. 3. The feasibility of TIPS depends on sufficient portal venous inflow to ensure stent patency, while also carrying a risk of hepatic encephalopathy. Based on these considerations, the investigators hypothesize that for patients with extensive portal thrombosis and inadequate portal inflow who are ineligible for TIPS, a combination of variceal embolization and partial splenic artery embolization may reduce portal pressure and decrease the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective cohort study has been designed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) is primarily caused by portal vein thrombosis (PVT). It is characterized by the formation of a network of tortuous, dilated, and malformed venous channels around the obstructed portal vein-a morphology that macroscopically resembles a sponge, hence the name. While a minority of patients with well-developed collateral circulation may remain asymptomatic, most develop complications of portal hypertension, such as esophagogastric variceal bleeding, ascites, and hypersplenism. Variceal bleeding, in particular, is associated with acute onset and high mortality. The management of variceal bleeding in CTPV generally follows guidelines for cirrhotic portal hypertension, including pharmacological therapy, endoscopic treatment, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and surgical intervention. However, the distinct hemodynamics resulting from portal vein occlusion pose specific therapeutic challenges:

1. Limited Efficacy of Conventional Pharmacological and Endoscopic Therapies: The chronic organic obstruction in CTPV renders pharmacological agents that reduce portal pressure-such as non-selective beta-blockers-largely ineffective, as they cannot adequately decrease pressure distal to the occlusion. Furthermore, the extensive and complex collateral circulation that develops (e.g., gastroesophageal varices, retroperitoneal venous networks) is often multifocal and highly interconnected. This makes it difficult for endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy to comprehensively address all potential bleeding sources. As a result, CTPV patients experience significantly higher rebleeding rates after endoscopic therapy compared to those with conventional portal hypertension.
2. Challenges of Splenectomy with Periesophagogastric Devascularization: Although this classic surgical procedure is used for variceal bleeding in standard portal hypertension, its application in CTPV is complicated by several factors. The spleen is often markedly enlarged and adherent to adjacent structures due to chronic congestion, and the splenic hilar vessels are tortuous and friable, increasing the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. Moreover, the abundant collateral circulation requires the ligation of a much larger number of vessels than in typical cases. Incomplete devascularization can lead to rebleeding, while the extensive nature of the surgery-coupled with chronic malnutrition and reduced hepatic reserve-elevates the risks of infection, liver failure, and thrombosis, contributing to high perioperative mortality.
3. Limitations of TIPS: While TIPS has shown efficacy in selected CTPV patients with portal hypertension, its success depends on sufficient portal venous inflow to maintain stent patency. In cases with extensive thrombosis involving the splenic or superior mesenteric veins, inadequate inflow increases the risk of early stent thrombosis and shunt dysfunction. Additionally, TIPS carries a well-established risk of hepatic encephalopathy, necessitating careful patient selection, particularly in those with advanced liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C) or high baseline encephalopathy risk.

Evidence suggests that combined variceal embolization and partial splenic artery embolization achieves hemostatic outcomes comparable to modified TIPS in cirrhotic portal hypertension, with similar rebleeding rates. This dual interventional approach may also confer benefits in terms of liver function improvement and could be particularly advantageous for patients at high risk of hepatic encephalopathy or with significant liver impairment. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that for CTPV patients with extensive portosystemic thrombosis and insufficient portal inflow who are unsuitable for shunt procedures, this combined embolization therapy may reduce portal pressure and mitigate the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein Gastroesophageal Varices Bleeding

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein Esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding Variceal Embolization Partial Splenic Artery Embolization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CTPV

A minority of CTPV patients with well-established collateral circulation may remain asymptomatic. However, the majority develop complications of portal hypertension, such as esophagogastric variceal bleeding, ascites, and hypersplenism. Variceal bleeding in particular is characterized by acute onset and high mortality.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variceal Embolization Combined With Partial Splenic Artery Embolization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Variceal Embolization :

1. Under ultrasound guidance, a branch of the portal or splenic vein was percutaneously punctured.
2. Angiography was performed with pressure measurements to evaluate the varices.
3. The varices were embolized using spring coils and/or tissue adhesive .
4. Post-embolization angiography was subsequently performed to assess the technical outcome.

Partial Splenic Artery Embolization :

1. The right femoral artery was punctured using the Seldinger technique.
2. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed following selective catheterization of the splenic artery to delineate its anatomy and branching pattern.
3. Embolic particles were injected under fluoroscopic guidance.
4. Intermittent follow-up splenic arteriography was performed, on the basis of the reduction in blood flow velocity, to evaluate the degree of embolization.
5. The range of the embolization was targeted at 50-60% of the splenic parenchyma.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Variceal Embolization Combined With Partial Splenic Artery Embolization

Variceal Embolization :

1. Under ultrasound guidance, a branch of the portal or splenic vein was percutaneously punctured.
2. Angiography was performed with pressure measurements to evaluate the varices.
3. The varices were embolized using spring coils and/or tissue adhesive .
4. Post-embolization angiography was subsequently performed to assess the technical outcome.

Partial Splenic Artery Embolization :

1. The right femoral artery was punctured using the Seldinger technique.
2. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed following selective catheterization of the splenic artery to delineate its anatomy and branching pattern.
3. Embolic particles were injected under fluoroscopic guidance.
4. Intermittent follow-up splenic arteriography was performed, on the basis of the reduction in blood flow velocity, to evaluate the degree of embolization.
5. The range of the embolization was targeted at 50-60% of the splenic parenchyma.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-75 years;
2. Diagnosis of cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) confirmed by at least one imaging modality (ultrasonography, CT, or MRI);
3. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) extending to the splenic vein (SV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV);
4. History of portal hypertension complicated by variceal bleeding, with recurrent bleeding despite pharmacological and endoscopic therapies;
5. Treated with combined variceal embolization and partial splenic artery embolization;
6. Availability of at least one postoperative follow-up examination with documented clinical data and survival status.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Concomitant malignant tumor;
2. Active infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tie Jun

Director of clinical research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jun Tie

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Air Force Military Medical University, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Air Force Military Medical University

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jun Tie, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +862984771537

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jun Tie, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20252459-F-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id