Remembering Risk: Using Visual Risk Display of MINS to Obtain Informed Consent to Undergo Elective Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04247841

Last Updated: 2021-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

456 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-29

Study Completion Date

2021-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Disclosure of anticipated risks to individuals considering undergoing an operative procedure is an important aspect of informed consent process. Recent Canadian Guidelines have highlighted the importance of perioperative risk discussion within the context of preoperative assessment but there is little prior research into potential interventions to optimize the communication of risks. Myocaridal injury (MINS) is the most common complication and this study is focused on determining the effectiveness of current communication strategies in our presurgical consultations and to quantifying the impact of introducing a visual aid and scripted risk discussions has on patients ability to recall their individualized perioperative risk of myocardial injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Informed consent is an important aspect of the patient-physician relationship. Prior to agreeing to undergo treatment patients must have risks and benefits disclosed to a "reasonable patient" standard.1 The 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment strongly recommend the communication of perioperative cardiac risk to patients.2 Myocardial injury is the most common post-operative complications and has significant impact on patient outcomes including survival.2. However, very few studies have examined the communication of risk to patients, particularly when communicating perioperative cardiac risk.

The aim of this study is a 2-stage research project to address current practice in perioperative risk communication and examine opportunity to improve communication and patient education.

Phase One is structured to assess the current practices with respect to cardiac risk discussion at our academic center. During this initial phase, a survey will be offered after the PSS consultation to patients \> 45 years old, seen in consult prior to elective orthopedic surgery requiring an overnight admission to KHSC. The survey will assess current risk discussion practices, patient satisfaction with cardiac risk discussion, ability to recall cardiac risk, importance of cardiac risk disclosure, and seek general feedback from participants.

Phase Two of this study is structured to assess the effectiveness of incorporating the use of structured, scripted risk discussion with and without the use of a visual aid. The patients will complete the survey instrument immediately after their PSS consultation to assess patient satisfaction with cardiac risk discussion, recall of risk, importance of cardiac risk discussion from the patients' perspective, and general feedback will be sought regarding perioperative education.

A subset of consenting patients during both Phase I and II will be followed-up post operatively (within 48h) to assess recall of preoperative cardiac risk discussion.

Our study group hypothesizes that the use of visual representation of perioperative risk of Myocardial Injury after Non-Cardiac Surgery during the pre-anesthetic assessment will improve the patients' satisfaction with the cardiac risk discussion and their understanding and retention of the risk in the post-operative period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Risk

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

During Phase 1 we will be completing data collection on a prospective cohort of patients attending Presurgical Screening (PSS) Clinic in preparation for elective total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee.

During the Phase 2 we will utilize a randomized approach to generate 2 groups of patients who will have their preoperative risk discussion guided by the use of a structured script or have the risk discussion guided by the use of a structured script and the display of a visual aid outlining the risk of myocardial injury
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants will be masked to the primary purpose of the study during their preoperative consultation. Upon receiving and completing the survey responses they will be asked to recall their individualized risk of myocardial injury and provide feedback on the risk discussion they had with the anesthesiologist.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phase I: Current Practice

This represents the first phase of the study in which a prospective cohort of patients will complete the survey to define baseline rates of recall of perioperative risk and level of patient satisfaction with risk discussion

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Phase II Visual Aid & Scripted Risk Discussion

This will involve a group of patients randomized to receive their perioperative risk discussion supplemented with the use of a visual aid in addition to a scripted discussion of their personalized perioperative risk of myocardial injury (MINS) during their consultation with an anesthesiologist in the PSS clinic.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Visual Aid

Intervention Type OTHER

The visual aid will include a graphic display of 100 individuals with number of individuals anticipated to suffer a myocardial injury highlighted by being filled in in red. There will also be a textual discription stating the anticipated risk. For example in a patient with an rCRI score = 2 the text will state 10 out of 100 patients will have a myocardial injury (MINS) and 90 out of 100 patients will have no myocardial injury and 10 of the patients will be shaded red on the visual aid. The patients in this intervention will also received the scripted discussion of perioperative risk of MINS.

Scripted Risk Discussion

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients seen in PSS will have a standardized discussion of perioperative risk of myocardial injury read to them by the anesthesiologist in the PSS clinic.

Phase II Scripted Risk Discussion

This will involve a group of patients randomized to receive a scripted discussion of their personalized perioperative risk of myocardial injury (MINS) during their consultation with an anesthesiologist in the PSS clinic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Scripted Risk Discussion

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients seen in PSS will have a standardized discussion of perioperative risk of myocardial injury read to them by the anesthesiologist in the PSS clinic.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Visual Aid

The visual aid will include a graphic display of 100 individuals with number of individuals anticipated to suffer a myocardial injury highlighted by being filled in in red. There will also be a textual discription stating the anticipated risk. For example in a patient with an rCRI score = 2 the text will state 10 out of 100 patients will have a myocardial injury (MINS) and 90 out of 100 patients will have no myocardial injury and 10 of the patients will be shaded red on the visual aid. The patients in this intervention will also received the scripted discussion of perioperative risk of MINS.

Intervention Type OTHER

Scripted Risk Discussion

The patients seen in PSS will have a standardized discussion of perioperative risk of myocardial injury read to them by the anesthesiologist in the PSS clinic.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 45 years of age or older who are seen in Presurgical Screening Clinic by an anesthesiologist prior to elective hip or knee arthroplasty at Kingston Health Sciences Centre.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to provide consent due to communication/language barrier
* Prior enrollment in this study
* No planned admission to hospital ( Same - Day joint arthroplasty)
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. Michael McMullen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Michael McMullen

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael McMullen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's Univerisity

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRAQ #: 6028012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Feasibility of Stimulating the Visual Cortex in Blind
NCT02747589 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA