Duodenal Feeds in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

NCT ID: NCT04246333

Last Updated: 2026-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-07

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Premature infants have high rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) due to prematurity of the participants' lungs and the need for prolonged respiratory support. These infants are at increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration which may exacerbate lung injury. Transpyloric feeds, specifically duodenal feeds, may be used to bypass the stomach and directly feed the duodenum decreasing the amount of gastric reflux contributing to aspiration. Duodenal feeds are equivalent to gastric feeds with regards to nutritional outcomes, and have been shown to decrease events of apnea and bradycardia in premature infants. This study will evaluate the feasibility and safety of duodenal feeds in premature infants. The hypothesis is that duodenal feeds may be safely and successfully performed in premature very low birth weight infants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary outcome of this study is the safety and feasibility of duodenal feeds in very low birth weight infants. The secondary outcomes are various measures related to growth, respiratory support, comorbidities, and hospitalization.

Eligibility of infants admitted to the Johns Hopkins All Children's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) will be determined based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible infants will be recruited and enrolled by 14 days of life after informed consent is obtained. Randomization of the infants into two groups- investigational continuous Duodenal Feeds (DF) or standard Gastric Feeds (GF) - will occur just prior to the infants advancing beyond 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds.

All enrolled infants will be fed per the institutional feeding protocol. Once infants advance past 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds, at this point infants will be randomized to DF or GF groups in a 1:1 block randomization using blinded envelopes. Multiple gestation infants will be randomized individually.

Placement of gastric tubes will be per standard of practice, and insertion of duodenal tube will be per manual of operations. Continuous duodenal feeds will be provided over 24 hours as a continuous infusion through a nasoduodenal or oro-duodenal tube. Standard gastric feeds will be infused via a nasogastric or orogastric tube per the instructions of the medical team. Gastric feeds are provided as standard of care in the NICU; intermittent bolus feeds over 15-60 minutes. Feeding time may be prolonged by the medical team, for longer than 60 minutes and possibly even be given continuously, for various reasons (emesis, reflux, apnea, bradycardia, etc.) and will be monitored and recorded. Feed volume and advancement will continue to be determined by standardized institutional feeding guidelines. Decision to provide further fortification of feeds beyond institutional guidelines will be determined by the medical team and not standardized in this protocol. Once full enteral feeds are achieved (total fluid goal of at least 140mL/kg/day), patients will continue to receive feeds via the designated route.

An institutional "Infant Driven Feeding Guideline" is utilized to evaluate readiness to orally feed and to transition premature infants from enteral to oral feeds. Once an infant is eligible to receive oral feeds per this guideline (32 weeks postmenstrual age, and tolerating ≤2L flow via nasal cannula for at least 24 hours), the study will allow the medical team to transition infants in the DF group to gastric feeds. Regarding transitioning infant from duodenal to gastric feeds, infants are initially placed on continuous gastric feeds, and once the participants have demonstrated tolerance (no evidence of reflux, increased respiratory support, emesis), the participants are then transitioned to bolus gastric feeds progressively. Infants may be allowed to orally feed during this transition period if the participants meet the appropriate infant driven feeding scores per protocol.

All infants in this study will be monitored for primary and secondary outcomes through the duration of admission and up until the time of discharge. Safety events will be frequently monitored for throughout the duration of admission and addressed immediately if warranted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia VLBW - Very Low Birth Weight Infant Feeding Disorder Neonatal Feeding; Difficult, Newborn Premature Birth Chronic Lung Disease of Prematurity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gastric Feeds

Patients in this arm will receive feeds via the standard route which is gastric feeds.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Duodenal Feeds

Patients in this arm will receive feeds via the experimental route which is duodenal feeds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mode of Delivery of Feeds

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligible infants will be recruited and enrolled and randomized to either duodenal feeds (DF) or gastric feeds (GF), which will occur just prior to the infants advancing beyond 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds. All enrolled infants will be fed per our institutional feeding protocol. Once infants advance past a volume of 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds, at this point infants will be randomized to DF or GF groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mode of Delivery of Feeds

Eligible infants will be recruited and enrolled and randomized to either duodenal feeds (DF) or gastric feeds (GF), which will occur just prior to the infants advancing beyond 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds. All enrolled infants will be fed per our institutional feeding protocol. Once infants advance past a volume of 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds, at this point infants will be randomized to DF or GF groups.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants admitted to the Johns Hopkins All Children's NICU before 72 hours of life
* Infants with a birth weight \<1251g

Exclusion Criteria

* First obtained pH \<7.0
* APGAR \<5 at 5 minutes (The Apgar score is a test given to newborns soon after birth. This test checks a baby's heart rate, muscle tone, and other signs to see if extra medical care or emergency care is needed. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR))
* Infants on hydrocortisone for hypotension prior to randomization
* Infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) defined by birth weight ≤10th percentile for gestational age
* Infants with congenital anomalies, including but not limited to: Chromosomal abnormalities;Structural airway or pulmonary abnormalities (e.g. tracheoesophageal fistulas, cleft palate, congenital pulmonary adenomatous malformation, etc.); Abdominal anomalies requiring surgical interventions (e.g. intestinal atresia, intestinal webs, gastroschisis, omphalocele, anal atresia); Major cardiac anomalies
* Infants with a history of intestinal perforation or NEC
* Presence of gastrostomy tube
* Infants who have not been initiated on any volume of enteral feeds by 10 days of life
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Noura Nickel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1723-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11401896 (View on PubMed)

Fenton TR, Nasser R, Eliasziw M, Kim JH, Bilan D, Sauve R. Validating the weight gain of preterm infants between the reference growth curve of the fetus and the term infant. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Jun 11;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-92.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23758808 (View on PubMed)

Shennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 1988 Oct;82(4):527-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3174313 (View on PubMed)

Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, Hale EC, Newman NS, Schibler K, Carlo WA, Kennedy KA, Poindexter BB, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Duara S, Sanchez PJ, O'Shea TM, Goldberg RN, Van Meurs KP, Faix RG, Phelps DL, Frantz ID 3rd, Watterberg KL, Saha S, Das A, Higgins RD; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):443-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2959. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20732945 (View on PubMed)

Poets CF. Gastroesophageal reflux: a critical review of its role in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):e128-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.e128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14754982 (View on PubMed)

Omari TI, Barnett CP, Benninga MA, Lontis R, Goodchild L, Haslam RR, Dent J, Davidson GP. Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease. Gut. 2002 Oct;51(4):475-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.4.475.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12235066 (View on PubMed)

Garland JS, Alex CP, Johnston N, Yan JC, Werlin SL. Association between tracheal pepsin, a reliable marker of gastric aspiration, and head of bed elevation among ventilated neonates. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014 Jan 1;7(3):185-92. doi: 10.3233/NPM-14814020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25318633 (View on PubMed)

Peter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Influence of nasogastric tubes on gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a multiple intraluminal impedance study. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):277-9. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.126298.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12183728 (View on PubMed)

Jolley SG, Halpern CT, Sterling CE, Feldman BH. The relationship of respiratory complications from gastroesophageal reflux to prematurity in infants. J Pediatr Surg. 1990 Jul;25(7):755-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(05)80012-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2380892 (View on PubMed)

Farhath S, Aghai ZH, Nakhla T, Saslow J, He Z, Soundar S, Mehta DI. Pepsin, a reliable marker of gastric aspiration, is frequently detected in tracheal aspirates from premature ventilated neonates: relationship with feeding and methylxanthine therapy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Sep;43(3):336-41. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000232015.56155.03.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16954956 (View on PubMed)

Knight PR, Davidson BA, Nader ND, Helinski JD, Marschke CJ, Russo TA, Hutson AD, Notter RH, Holm BA. Progressive, severe lung injury secondary to the interaction of insults in gastric aspiration. Exp Lung Res. 2004 Oct-Nov;30(7):535-57. doi: 10.1080/01902140490489162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15371091 (View on PubMed)

Blondheim O, Abbasi S, Fox WW, Bhutani VK. Effect of enteral gavage feeding rate on pulmonary functions of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1993 May;122(5 Pt 1):751-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(06)80021-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8496756 (View on PubMed)

Jensen EA, Munson DA, Zhang H, Blinman TA, Kirpalani H. Anti-gastroesophageal reflux surgery in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jun;50(6):584-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23052. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24753497 (View on PubMed)

McGuire W, McEwan P. Transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17636725 (View on PubMed)

Wells DH, Zachman RD. Nasojejunal feedings in low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr. 1975 Aug;87(2):276-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(75)80602-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 807697 (View on PubMed)

Drew JH, Johnston R, Finocchiaro C, Taylor PS, Goldberg HJ. A comparison of nasojejunal witn nasogastric feedings in low-birth-weight infants. Aust Paediatr J. 1979 Jun;15(2):98-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1979.tb01198.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 114157 (View on PubMed)

Roy RN, Pollnitz RB, Hamilton JR, Chance GW. Impaired assimilation of nasojejunal feeds in healthy low-birth-weight newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1977 Mar;90(3):431-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(77)80710-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 402459 (View on PubMed)

Whitfield MF. Poor weight gain of the low birthweight infant fed nasojejunally. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Aug;57(8):597-601. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.8.597.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6810764 (View on PubMed)

Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20036378 (View on PubMed)

Laing IA, Lang MA, Callaghan O, Hume R. Nasogastric compared with nasoduodenal feeding in low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1986 Feb;61(2):138-41. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.2.138.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3082297 (View on PubMed)

Wallenstein MB, Brooks C, Kline TA, Beck RQ, Yang W, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK. Early transpyloric vs gastric feeding in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;39(6):837-841. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0372-3. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30967655 (View on PubMed)

Macdonald PD, Skeoch CH, Carse H, Dryburgh F, Alroomi LG, Galea P, Gettinby G. Randomised trial of continuous nasogastric, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth weight under 1400 g. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr;67(4 Spec No):429-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.4_spec_no.429.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1586185 (View on PubMed)

Pereira GR, Lemons JA. Controlled study of transpyloric and intermittent gavage feeding in the small preterm infant. Pediatrics. 1981 Jan;67(1):68-72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6787557 (View on PubMed)

Caillie MV, Powell GK. Nasoduodenal versus nasogastric feeding in the very low birthweight infant. Pediatrics. 1975 Dec;56(6):1065-72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 812052 (View on PubMed)

Malcolm WF, Smith PB, Mears S, Goldberg RN, Cotten CM. Transpyloric tube feeding in very low birthweight infants with suspected gastroesophageal reflux: impact on apnea and bradycardia. J Perinatol. 2009 May;29(5):372-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.234. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19242488 (View on PubMed)

Misra S, Macwan K, Albert V. Transpyloric feeding in gastroesophageal-reflux-associated apnea in premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Oct;96(10):1426-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00442.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17850402 (View on PubMed)

Hsu CW, Sun SF, Lin SL, Kang SP, Chu KA, Lin CH, Huang HH. Duodenal versus gastric feeding in medical intensive care unit patients: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):1866-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819ffcda.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19384225 (View on PubMed)

Radford PJ, Stillwell PC, Blue B, Hertel G. Aspiration complicating bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Chest. 1995 Jan;107(1):185-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.185.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7813274 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00217658

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Baby Lung Study
NCT05152316 COMPLETED