Vitamin A Supplementation for Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

NCT ID: NCT01203488

Last Updated: 2017-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

807 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1996-01-31

Study Completion Date

1999-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multi-site, randomized trial was conducted to determine the safety and effectiveness of a higher dose of vitamin A and determine if this would increase the rate of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and reduce the risk of sepsis. Infants with birth weights from 401-1000g and who were on mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen at 24-96 hours of age were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to either the Vitamin A or a control group. Infants in the Vitamin A group were given a dose of 5000 IU (0.1 ml) intramuscularly on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for four weeks. Control infants received a sham procedure rather than placebo injections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Infants with extremely low birth weights (≤1,000 g) have low plasma and tissue concentrations of vitamin A, and vitamin A deficiency may predispose these infants to chronic lung disease. A meta-analysis of clinical trials of vitamin A supplementation for preterm infants revealed a 17% increase in the rate of survival without chronic lung disease, which approached statistical significance.

This multi-site, randomized trial was conducted to determine the safety and effectiveness of a higher dose of vitamin A than that used in previous trials in extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants. We hypothesized that vitamin A supplementation would increase the rate of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia and reduce the risk of sepsis.

Infants with birth weights from 401-1000g and who received mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen at 24-96 hours of age were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to either the vitamin A or a control group. Infants in the Vitamin A group were given a dose of 5000 IU (0.1 ml) intramuscularly on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for four weeks. Control infants received a sham procedure rather than placebo injections.

Serum vitamin A was measured in a central laboratory at base line and at 28 days in the first 300 infants. On study day 28 (two to three days after the last treatment and immediately after a blood sample was collected), the relative dose-response was evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infant, Newborn Infant, Low Birth Weight Infant, Small for Gestational Age Infant, Premature Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Respiration, Artificial Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Vitamin A group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vitamin A

Intervention Type DRUG

5,000 IU (0.1 ml) was given on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for four weeks.

Control

Sham procedure Control group.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

Control infants received a sham procedure rather than placebo injections.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitamin A

5,000 IU (0.1 ml) was given on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for four weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham Procedure

Control infants received a sham procedure rather than placebo injections.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants wtih birth weights from 401-1,000g
* Receiving mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen at 24-96 hours of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Major congenital anomalies
* Congenital nonbacterial infection
* Infants diagnosed with a terminal illness (as indicated by a pH below 6.80 or by the presence of hypoxia with bradycardia for more than two hours)
* Infants who were to receive vitamin A in a parenteral fat emulsion or in doses exceeding recommendations for multivitamin preparations
Minimum Eligible Age

24 Hours

Maximum Eligible Age

96 Hours

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

NICHD Neonatal Research Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jon E. Tyson, MD MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

William Oh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital

Joel Verter, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

George Washington University Biostatistics Center

Richard A. Ehrenkranz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Barbara J. Stoll, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

James A. Lemons, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

David K. Stevenson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Charles R. Bauer, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Miami

Sheldon B. Korones, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Tennessee

Edward F. Donovan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Case Western Reserve University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

George Washington University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

University of Tennessee

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stark AR, Tyson JE, Hibberd PL. Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial. J Perinatol. 2010 Mar;30(3):163-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.157. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19798046 (View on PubMed)

Kennedy KA, Stoll BJ, Ehrenkranz RA, Oh W, Wright LL, Stevenson DK, Lemons JA, Sowell A, Mele L, Tyson JE, Verter J. Vitamin A to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very-low-birth-weight infants: has the dose been too low? The NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Early Hum Dev. 1997 Jul 24;49(1):19-31. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)01869-0.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9179535 (View on PubMed)

Tyson JE, Wright LL, Oh W, Kennedy KA, Mele L, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, Lemons JA, Stevenson DK, Bauer CR, Korones SB, Fanaroff AA. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 24;340(25):1962-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906243402505.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10379020 (View on PubMed)

Ambalavanan N, Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, Hansen NI, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Carlo WA; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely low birth weight infants: outcome at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e249-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1812. Epub 2005 Feb 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15713907 (View on PubMed)

Rysavy MA, Li L, Tyson JE, Jensen EA, Das A, Ambalavanan N, Laughon MM, Greenberg RG, Patel RM, Pedroza C, Bell EF; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Should Vitamin A Injections to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia or Death Be Reserved for High-Risk Infants? Reanalysis of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Randomized Trial. J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:78-85.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 May 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34004189 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://neonatal.rti.org/

NICHD Neonatal Research Network

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U10HD021373

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027904

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HD019897

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027871

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR006022

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027851

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027856

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR000750

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027880

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR000070

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD021397

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD021415

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD021364

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027853

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR008084

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD034216

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD021385

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD034167

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10HD027881

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR000997

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NICHD-NRN-0015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id