Outcomes Following Early Parenteral Nutrition Use in Preterm Neonates

NCT ID: NCT03767634

Last Updated: 2022-03-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

97507 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND

An essential part of neonatal care is providing nutrition to ensure that babies grow and develop. Providing this can be difficult in premature babies because their intestines are underdeveloped. They often have difficulty digesting milk so feeds are introduced gradually. To help babies grow and develop during this period, additional nutrition may be provided as a fluid into a vein; this is called "parenteral nutrition" (PN). Unfortunately, PN increases the risk of serious complications like bloodstream infection (also known as "sepsis"). For babies who are moderately premature there is little evidence to guide decision making about which babies will benefit from PN. This group of babies have more reserves of fat and are less dependent on PN, but are still at risk of sepsis. As a consequence, some doctors use PN and others do not.

AIMS

Firstly, to describe which babies are given PN during the first postnatal week in neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales.

Secondly, to determine whether in babies born 7-10 weeks preterm (moderately premature), providing PN in the first week after birth, compared to not to providing PN, improves survival to discharge from the neonatal unit.

Finally, to evaluate if the early use of PN in moderately preterm babies affects other important outcomes in the neonatal core outcomes set.

IMPORTANCE

This work will describe the extent of PN use in England, Scotland and Wales. This is currently unknown. This project will improve understanding of the balance of benefits and harms of PN use in premature babies and will help doctors and parents make informed treatment choices.

METHODS

The investigators will use the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) to study all babies born in England, Scotland and Wales; they will identify which babies were given PN during the first week, and which were not. The investigators will use the NNRD to identify babies born 7-10 weeks prematurely and compare outcomes in babies that were given and not given PN in the first week after birth. The investigators will use statistical techniques to identify two sets of babies in the NNRD who are very similar (in terms of how prematurely they were born, their birth weight, and so on), the only difference being whether they were given PN or not. As the two groups will be similar any difference in their outcomes (such as survival) is likely to be due to whether or not they received PN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Premature birth abruptly ends the transplacental transmission of nutrients that allows normal foetal growth and development. Providing adequate nutrition is essential to allow premature babies to continue to grow and mature. Very preterm infants often have difficulty tolerating adequate volumes of milk feeds shortly after birth and so are given supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN). Preterm babies are among the highest PN users of all NHS patients. It has been estimated that PN is received by around 70% of neonatal unit admissions but it is not known exactly which babies receive PN. In addition, how PN affects outcomes has never been tested in a large scale, randomized, placebo controlled neonatal trial.

It is known that PN carries well established risks, of which the most serious and the most common is sepsis with estimates of risk ratios varying from 2.2 to 14.6. In addition there is a growing body of evidence that use of PN within the first seven days of admission to an intensive care unit is associated with worse outcomes in critically unwell adults and children. A subgroup analysis of the paediatric intensive care unit population focusing on neonates showed an increase in infections with early PN use. This suggests that uncertainty exists over the benefit of giving neonates PN in the early postnatal period. It is generally accepted that PN is beneficial to extremely preterm neonates, but in moderately preterm neonates the effect that PN use has on neonatal survival has never been conclusively demonstrated.

The uncertainty over how PN use affects neonatal outcomes is reflected by the wide variety in how PN is used in different units with large variation in use, timing and composition of PN. This is, in part, due to the lack of clear evidence of how PN affects neonatal outcomes like growth and survival. Neonates are also vulnerable to unanticipated treatment effects which can occur in different organ systems and so it is important to show that PN is not detrimental to important neonatal outcomes.

The postmenstrual age at which the nutritional benefits of PN outweigh the risks in moderately preterm babies (30-33 weeks postmenstrual age) is unknown. It is therefore unsurprising that their nutritional management is very variable. In moderately preterm neonates in 2012 and 2013 across England, Scotland and Wales PN was given to 45% of neonates, suggesting clinician equipoise around the balance of benefit to risk. Identifying whether moderately preterm neonates benefit from PN would have important implications for practice in the UK. This work will provide information to guide practice and inform future research.

In summary, PN is widely used in neonates but it is not known exactly how it is used in the UK. It is known to have risks and benefits but there is insufficient evidence to guide practice in moderately preterm neonates.

Study objectives:

* To describe the use of PN in neonatal units across England, Scotland and Wales.
* To identify if use of PN in the first seven postnatal days affects survival in neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks postmenstrual age.
* To explore how PN use in the first seven postnatal days affects other important neonatal outcomes in neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks postmenstrual age.

Study design:

Project A: an epidemiological survey of practice using the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD).

Project B: a retrospective cohort study of matched groups of babies using data held in the NNRD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neonatal Death Prematurity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neonatal population (Project A)

Neonates born between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017 and admitted to a neonatal unit in England, Scotland and Wales).

No interventions assigned to this group

No PN use (Project B)

All neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks postmenstrual age in England, Wales and Scotland and admitted to a NHS neonatal unit between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017 who did not receive any parenteral nutrition (for any duration, by any intravenous route) in the first seven postnatal days.

No interventions assigned to this group

PN use (Project B)

All neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks postmenstrual age in England, Wales and Scotland and admitted to a NHS neonatal unit between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017 who received any parenteral nutrition (for any duration, by any intravenous route) in the first seven postnatal days.

Parenteral nutrition

Intervention Type OTHER

Parenteral nutrition is the administration of an intravenous solution containing amino acids (with or without lipids) to provide nutritional support.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Parenteral nutrition

Parenteral nutrition is the administration of an intravenous solution containing amino acids (with or without lipids) to provide nutritional support.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Project A:

* Must be born between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017
* Must be admitted to a National Health Service (NHS) neonatal unit in England, Scotland or Wales

Project B:

* Must be born between 30 and 33 weeks postmenstrual age
* Must be born between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017
* Must be admitted to an NHS neonatal unit in England, Scotland or Wales

Exclusion Criteria

Project A:


Project B:

* Major congenital gastrointestinal malformations
* Life limiting conditions
* Congenital conditions requiring surgery in the neonatal period
* Missing key background data (birthweight, sex or gestational age)
* Missing data for the primary outcome
Maximum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chris RK Gale, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Imperial College London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Webbe J, Battersby C, Longford N, Oughham K, Uthaya S, Modi N, Gale C. Use of parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week in England and Wales: an observational study using real-world data. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Aug;6(1):e001543. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001543.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36053624 (View on PubMed)

Webbe JWH, Longford N, Battersby C, Oughham K, Uthaya SN, Modi N, Gale C. Outcomes in relation to early parenteral nutrition use in preterm neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks' gestation: a propensity score matched observational study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Mar;107(2):131-136. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321643. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34548324 (View on PubMed)

Webbe J, Longford N, Uthaya S, Modi N, Gale C. Outcomes following early parenteral nutrition use in preterm neonates: protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e029065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029065.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31289090 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18IC4724

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Duodenal Feeds in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
NCT04246333 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA