Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration for Prevention of Dehydration in Premature Babies, During the First Days of Life.

NCT ID: NCT00715000

Last Updated: 2013-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomised study comparing administration of a hypo-osmolar oral hydration solution with the classical hydration via IV (intravenous) infusion in premature infants of more than 32 weeks GA (gestational age) aims to determine whether administration of a hypo-osmolar oral hydration solution is as efficient as intravenous infusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In order to prevent dehydration of the premature infant during the first days of life, enteral nutrition with milk must be complemented by an additional fluid supply, commonly administered intravenously. We propose to perform a prospective randomised multi-centric study comparing administration of a hypo-osmolar oral hydration solution with the classical hydration via IV (intravenous) infusion in premature infants of more than 30 weeks GA (gestational age).

We define success as a weight loss inferior to 15 % of birth weight and a weight at day 15 superior to birth weight. Failure was defined hence as a weight loss superior to 15% of birth weight or a weight at day 15 inferior to birth weight or a severe complication or death. Major violations of the protocol in the study group will be counted as failures. The other objectives were to determine whether oral hydration demonstrates practical advantages: less complications in initial management, more comfort for the baby and less technical challenges for the nurses/doctors in charge. Furthermore to evaluate the clinical tolerance of oral hydration from a nutritional point of view and to examine it's effects on intestinal function (defecation, gastric residues), signs of intestinal inflammation and GI flora.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Birth Weight Infant Enteral Nutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

SRO

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oral rehydration therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

oral rehydration solution

2

classical hydration via intravenous infusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

classical hydration via intravenous infusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

intravenous infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oral rehydration therapy

oral rehydration solution

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

classical hydration via intravenous infusion

intravenous infusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SRO IV

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Premature babies between 32 to 34 + 6 weeks of gestation, with a birth weight greater than 1700g and less than 2200g under exclusion of SGA (small for gestational age) babies with a BW \< 10th percentile.
* Infants must be included within the first 12 to 24 hours of life
* Good tolerance to nasogastric milk feeding
* Necessity of additional fluid supply
* Any suspicion of gastro intestinal or metabolic disease
* Maximal humidity in incubator
* Parental consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* suspicion of gastro-intestinal disease,
* severe digestive risks, and metabolic diseases in the family history,
* metabolic or hydro-electrolyte disorders
* other severe diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

32 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

34 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hasini RAZAFIMAHEFA, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Antoine Béclère

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Antoine Béclère

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P060208

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Sodium Intake in Preterm Newborns
NCT04035564 COMPLETED PHASE4