Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Improving HIV Treatment Outcomes in South Africa
NCT ID: NCT04242992
Last Updated: 2025-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-12
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial of a Supporter-Targeted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Recent Sexual Assault Survivors
NCT05345405
Effectiveness of a Family-Based Intervention for Adolescent Suicide Attempters (The SAFETY Study)
NCT00692302
Translation of an Intervention for Violence Among Adolescents in Emergency Departments
NCT02923492
Mpata Yathu Trial for Young Women in Zambia
NCT07132905
Effects of a Standardized Post-coercion Review Session.
NCT03512925
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial of HIV-infected women, with or without their partners, who have experienced IPV and have an unsuppressed viral load to test the effect of CETA, in increasing retention and viral suppression, and reducing violence. The study has three aims:
* Aim 1: Among HIV-infected women on ART who have experienced IPV and have an unsuppressed viral load, assess the effectiveness of CETA vs. active control at increasing the proportion retained and virally suppressed by 12 months and at decreasing the severity and incidence of IPV and other mental and behavioral health problems using an individually randomized trial;
* Aim 2: To identify mediators and moderators of CETA's effect on the primary outcome (retention and viral suppression);
* Aim 3: To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of CETA vs. active control at increasing the proportion who are retained and virally suppressed by 12 months.
Study staff will obtain full informed consent from those who meet inclusion criteria. For those that agree to participate, study staff will then randomize patients to CETA or control using sealed randomization envelopes. All subjects will be followed for 24 months to ensure data for primary and secondary outcomes is complete. Follow-up HIV data will be passive using routinely collected medical records from the clinics. HIV outcomes will be assessed at 3-, 12- and 24-months post-baseline. Questionnaires on violence, substance use, and mental health will be administered at baseline, and at 3 months (following CETA end) and 12 months post-baseline. These include: Severity of Violence Against Women Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test. The primary outcome will be retention and viral suppression (\<50 copies/mL) by 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes will include: 1) Viral suppression at 3 and 24 months; 2) Attrition at 12 and 24 months; 3) IPV, mental/behavioral health, alcohol and other substance use at 3 and 12 months; and 4) Cost and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
The primary aim is to analyze the impact of CETA in the full study population; however, our sample size was calculated to ensure our ability to detect differences separately among women who include a partner in the CETA intervention and those who do not. A sample of 400 women will be included which will give us 80% power to detect an absolute 21% difference between arms. The primary analysis will be a comparison of intervention and control by risk differences with 95% confidence intervals. The investigators will analyze direct effects of CETA on continuous outcomes (e.g., mental health) with linear mixed models.The impact of potential moderators on retention and mental health outcomes using interaction terms will be assessed. Micro costing methods will be used to cost all resources utilized and the cost effectiveness of CETA achieving the primary outcome will be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CETA (Common Elements Treatment Approach)
CETA is a modular, multi-problem, flexible psychotherapy approach that trains a lay provider in nine evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) elements so the provider can treat a variety of common problems, including violence, substance use, depression, anxiety, risky behaviors (sexual, non-adherence), and other trauma-related symptoms. Patients randomized to CETA will meet weekly with a lay provider or community health worker member of the study staff for about an hour once each week, approximately 6-12 times depending on presentation and symptom level. This treatment arm will include Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders of their HIV care appointments, similar to the active control group. As of October 12, 2022 participants can elect to have CETA delivered by telephone.
CETA
CETA is a modular, multi-problem, flexible psychotherapy approach that trains a lay provider in nine evidence-based CBT elements so providers can treat a variety of common problems, including violence, substance use, depression, anxiety, risky behaviors (sexual, non-adherence), and other trauma-related symptoms. Patients randomized to CETA will meet weekly with a lay provider or community health worker member of the study staff for about an hour once each week, approximately 6-12 times depending on presentation and symptom level. This treatment arm will include SMS reminders of their HIV care appointments, similar to the active control group.
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders for upcoming appointments will be sent monthly.
Active control
Our comparison arm will be an active control receiving usual care for intimate partner violence. Short Message Service (SMS) text messages will be sent monthly to our control group participants to remind them of HIV care appointments.
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders for upcoming appointments will be sent monthly.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CETA
CETA is a modular, multi-problem, flexible psychotherapy approach that trains a lay provider in nine evidence-based CBT elements so providers can treat a variety of common problems, including violence, substance use, depression, anxiety, risky behaviors (sexual, non-adherence), and other trauma-related symptoms. Patients randomized to CETA will meet weekly with a lay provider or community health worker member of the study staff for about an hour once each week, approximately 6-12 times depending on presentation and symptom level. This treatment arm will include SMS reminders of their HIV care appointments, similar to the active control group.
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders for upcoming appointments will be sent monthly.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Initiated HIV treatment
* Most recent viral load \>50 copies/mL or they have defaulted from treatment or had a missed or late (\>14 days) visit in the last year
* Has experienced IPV in the past 12 months
* Has their own phone and can receive text messages
* Literate and able to speak and read one of: English, Zulu, SeSotho
* If including a partner, the woman has disclosed HIV status to the partner that will be invited to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Currently psychotic or on unstable psychiatric regimen
* Suicide attempt/ideation with intent and plan, and/or self-harm in the past month
* Enrolled in any other HIV treatment intervention study
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Boston University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Fox, DSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HIV Clinic
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pascoe S, Fox M, Kane J, Mngadi S, Manganye P, Long LC, Metz K, Allen T, Sardana S, Greener R, Zheng A, Thea DM, Murray LK. Study protocol: A randomised trial of the effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) for improving HIV treatment outcomes among women experiencing intimate partner violence in South Africa. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e065848. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065848.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-39746
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.