Shared Decision Making on Immunotherapy in Oncology

NCT ID: NCT04240717

Last Updated: 2022-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-07

Study Completion Date

2022-10-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with advanced melanoma are confronted with a serious treatment decision. The current guideline recommends considering the option of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. The substances approved for this purpose differ greatly in their efficacy and the risk for adverse events. Besides, in about half of the patients with advanced melanoma a BRAF V600 Mutation is found. In these patients, in addition to immunotherapy, treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors must be considered.

Research on shared decision making suggests that patients achieve greater satisfaction with the decision if they are actively being involved in the decision-making process. To enable them to do so, an interactive, web-based patient decision aid (PtDA) informing about the treatment options for advanced melanoma will be developed and evaluated in a bicentric, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

The use of PtDA is expected to lead to a higher level of information about the benefits and risks of the various treatment options (primary hypothesis).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Immunotherapies are regarded as a new, promising treatment option for patients with advanced melanoma. However, immunotherapies can cause massive up to life-threatening side effects. The risks and benefits vary considerably between the possible therapy options. Besides, in about half of the patients with advanced melanoma a BRAF V600 Mutation is found. In these patients, in addition to immunotherapy, treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors must be considered. This treatment option usually produces a rapid response. In most cases, however, melanomas develop resistance after about 12 months.

Therefore, patients with advanced melanoma and their treating physicians are confronted with a very complex and preference-sensitive decision situation. Support in the form of a Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) can be helpful to support this complex decision-making process.

In the first project phase, an interactive web-based PtDA on treatment options for advanced melanomas will be developed. In the second phase of the project, the PtDA will be evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with a diagnosis of advanced melanoma will be recruited at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and at the University Cancer Center (UCC) Dresden.

Patients of the intervention group will receive access to the interactive PtDA prior to a medical consultation. Patients of the control group will receive the medical consultation only (treatment-as-usual). Group differences between the intervention group and the control group are analysed at T1 (immediately after the medical consultation) and T2 (three months after the medical consultation). The following variables are measured: informedness of the decision (primary outcome), decision satisfaction, and involvement of the patients in the decision process.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Decision Aid Treatment As Usual

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned to the interventional group (decision aid) or the control group (treatment-as-usual).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Decision Aid

Patients review an interactive, web-based Patient Decision Aid regarding their treatment options. Afterwards they receive medical consultation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient Decision Aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The Patient Decision Aid is an interactive, web-based tool that provides information on advanced melanoma and its treatment options with a strong focus on immunotherapies (i.e. response to therapy, risk of side effects).

Treatment As Usual

Patients receive medical consultation.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient Decision Aid

The Patient Decision Aid is an interactive, web-based tool that provides information on advanced melanoma and its treatment options with a strong focus on immunotherapies (i.e. response to therapy, risk of side effects).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Decision Aid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of metastatic melanoma (C43), stage 3 and 4
* first-line therapy
* tumor or metastases are not resectable
* sufficient knowledge of the German language to use the PtDA
* informed written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* limited legal capacity or impairments in this respect
* cognitive or physical impairments, which severely complicate the use of the Patient Decision Aid (e.g. impaired vision)
* severe psychiatric or mental illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Innovationsfonds des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses, Germany

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Heidelberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christiane Bieber

Prof. Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christiane Bieber, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Heidelberg University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital Dresden

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Lao CD, Cowey CL, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Dummer R, Ferrucci PF, Smylie M, Hogg D, Hill A, Marquez-Rodas I, Haanen J, Guidoboni M, Maio M, Schoffski P, Carlino MS, Lebbe C, McArthur G, Ascierto PA, Daniels GA, Long GV, Bastholt L, Rizzo JI, Balogh A, Moshyk A, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910836. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31562797 (View on PubMed)

Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28402085 (View on PubMed)

Volk RJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S1. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24624947 (View on PubMed)

Schadendorf D, van Akkooi ACJ, Berking C, Griewank KG, Gutzmer R, Hauschild A, Stang A, Roesch A, Ugurel S. Melanoma. Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):971-984. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31559-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30238891 (View on PubMed)

Grabbe P, Gschwendtner KM, Maatouk I, Strobel SB, Salzmann M, Bossert J, Eich W, Wild B, Meier F, Hassel JC, Bieber C. Development and validation of a web-based patient decision aid for immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05234-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33879219 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01VSF18047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pre Transplantation Melanoma
NCT04217382 COMPLETED