Immunological Functionnal Test Validation to Predict Melanoma Metastatic Patient Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

NCT ID: NCT05649683

Last Updated: 2024-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-31

Study Completion Date

2027-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Checkpoint inhibitor such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 are known to block inhibitory signals and increase the immune antimutoral response. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab association is considered as a more efficient immunotherapy to treat advanced melanoma. This combined immunotherapy is also responsible of severe immunes toxicyties. Identification of predictives biomarqueurs remains a challenge to predict the balance between tolerability and efficency. Previous data showed that advanced melanoma patient had lower level of Th1 cytokines that predict a less efficient immune system than healthy donors. The second point was that high level of Th1 and Th17 cytokines were correlate to a better tumor response. The last point was that patients with severe immune toxicity showed an increase of IL-6 and IL17a production. The investigators would like to identify the predictive values of Th1, Th2 and Th17 at the begining and during the combined immunotherapy and correlate these cytokines levels secretions to a potential efficient tumor response or to the emergence of induced immunes toxicities. This study is an original approach using functionnal test to predict the balance between efficienty and tolerability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma (Skin)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Analysis of blood cytokine

Patients will receive anti-PD1 therapy (Nivolumab/Nivo) with anti-CTLA4 therapy (Ipilimumab/Ipi) as part of routine care, as per the MA scheme followed in case of efficacy and good tolerance of Nivolumab maintenance treatment alone. The functional test for cytokines (1ml total blood on lihtium heparinate) will be performed at the initiation of ICI (J0), at week 6 (S6, after the 2nd cure), at week 11 (S11= 1st radiological evaluation, after the 4 cures of Nivo+Ipi), and, if applicable, the progression of the disease and/or the occurrence of an ESi grade 3-4. Stimulated lymphocytes from non-therapy responders will be tested in vitro by various immunomodulatory drugs.

During each sampling we will also collect 5 ml of serum on dry tube for serological constitution, 3ml on EDTA tube for performing an immunophenotyping (T, B, NK) and 3ml on EDTA tube for freezing total PBMC and setting up a biobank.

Group Type OTHER

Evaluation of cytokine production

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The patient will have samples at initiation of treatment (J0), after treatments 1 and 2 (S6), after the first radiological assessment at S11 and/or the progression of the disease and/or occurrence of a grade 3-4 adverse event

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Evaluation of cytokine production

The patient will have samples at initiation of treatment (J0), after treatments 1 and 2 (S6), after the first radiological assessment at S11 and/or the progression of the disease and/or occurrence of a grade 3-4 adverse event

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* persone of major age,
* advanced melanoma confirmed,
* RECIST 1.1 disease,
* first line treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* occular and mucosal melanoma,
* previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment,
* active brain metastasis,
* concomitant immunosuppressive treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Montaudie Henri, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Nice, Service de Dermatologie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nice - Hôpital de l'Archet

Nice, Alpes-maritimes, France

Site Status RECRUITING

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, Occitanie, France

Site Status RECRUITING

CHRU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Montaudie Henri, PhD

Role: CONTACT

33492036083

Pradelli Emmanuelle

Role: CONTACT

33492036083

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Montaudie Henri, PhD

Role: primary

33492036083

Seitz Barbara, PhD

Role: backup

Dereure Olivier, PhD

Role: primary

33467336906

Mortier Laurent, PhD

Role: primary

0033320444193

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22-PP-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.