Induction Therapy With Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib to Optimize Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02968303
Last Updated: 2020-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-27
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab induces relatively high response rates and promising response depth in late stage melanoma. Nevertheless, it takes time till responses occur and still a significant number of patients do not benefit from treatment, due to rapid progressive disease or resistance to therapy.
In contrast to immunotherapies targeted therapies (BRAF or MEK inhibitors), can induce faster and higher response rates, but often of shorter duration, even when combined.
Initial attempts of combining vemurafenib or dabrafenib + trametinib with ipilimumab failed due to toxicity.
Patients with elevated levels of serum LDH are less likely to respond to immunotherapy compared to patients with normal LDH levels. This does not mean that such patients do not benefit at all from immunotherapy.
This raises the question, whether response rates upon immunotherapy can be improved by upfront reduction of tumor burden and normalization of LDH.
The investigators postulate that induction therapy with combined BRAF+MEK inhibition, and subsequent LDH normalization, can improve response rates to the rates seen in LDH normal patients.
To address this question the investigators have setup a randomized phase 2 trial in metastatic melanoma patients with elevated serum LDH comparing the response rates upon ipilimumab + nivolumab versus ipilimumab + nivolumab preceded by 6 weeks of vemurafenib + cobimetinib induction.
Furthermore, less than half of the patients treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab received maintenance nivolumab, and approximately 40% of all patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. In 70% of patients responses were ongoing despite discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. This raises the question, to what extent does maintenance therapy add clinical benefit to an ongoing immune response. Preclinical data indicate even that continuous restimulation of T cells can result in activation induced non-responsiveness (anergy).
Therefore, a secondary objective of this trial will be, to test a response-driven nivolumab scheme
Objectives:
Primary Objective • To compare efficacy of induction vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) versus upfront ipilimumab + nivolumab treatment (Arm B).
Secondary Objectives
* To describe duration of response and overall survival induced by vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) as compared to ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm B)
* To describe the rate and quality of toxicity observed in the two study arms
* To describe the rate of ongoing responses upon response-driven flat dose (240mg q2w or 480mg q4w) nivolumab maintenance
* To determine the immune-activating capacity of induction therapy with vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab.
* To evaluate the changes in systemic immune competence
Study design:
This is a two-arm phase 2 study consisting of 200 BRAFV600E/K mutation-positive late-stage melanoma patients with an elevated baseline LDH level (\> ULN, \< 3xULN) randomized 1:1 (stratified according to LDH) to receive either vemurafenib + cobimetinib directly followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) or standard first line ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm B). Subsequently, patients in both arms will receive flat dose (240mg q2w or 480mg q4w) nivolumab maintenance in a response-driven manner.
Study population:
Stage IV, or unresectable stage III, BRAFV600E/K mutation positive melanoma patients, naïve for BRAF/MEK, PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 targeting therapy, 18 years and older.
Intervention:
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 6 weeks vemurafenib 960 mg bid + cobimetinib 60 mg QD 21-day on, 7-day off (21/7) schedule, directly followed by 4 courses of ipilimumab 3mg/kg q3wk + nivolumab 1mg/kg q3wk (Arm A) or first line standard 4 courses of ipilimumab 3mg/kg q3wk + nivolumab 1mg/kg q3wk (Arm B).
Subsequently, patients in both arms will receive nivolumab maintenance flat dose (240mg q2w or 480mg q4w) in a response-driven manner according to their response at week 18.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary Endpoints
• Compare the best overall response rate (BORR) according to RECIST 1.1 of both arms at week 18 from start of treatment.
Secondary Endpoints
* Progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST 1.1
* Overall survival (OS)
* Percentage of grade 3/4 toxicities according to CTCv4.03
* Percentage of ongoing response, percentage of patients requiring re-induction, response percentage upon re-induction
* Changes in tumor-specific T cell responses
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pembrolizumab and Ibrutinib in Treating Patients With Stage III-IV Melanoma That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT03021460
Study to Identify the Optimal Adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Melanoma Patients
NCT02437279
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a Sequencing Schedule of Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib Followed by Immunotherapy With an Anti- PD-L1 Antibody in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutant Melanoma
NCT02902029
The Effects of Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib on Immunity in Patients With Melanoma
NCT01813214
Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab in Locally Advanced or Limited Metastatic Melanoma
NCT06566391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Induction treatment
Induction vemurafenib and cobimetinib (6 weeks) directly followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab
Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib
Combination of Vemurafenib with Cobimetinib in BRAF V600E/K mutated melanoma patients to normalize LDH and optimize immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab
No induction treatment
Upfront ipilimumab and nivolumab without induction by vemurafenib and cobimetinib
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib
Combination of Vemurafenib with Cobimetinib in BRAF V600E/K mutated melanoma patients to normalize LDH and optimize immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status 0-2
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed Stage IV, or unresectable stage III, BRAF V600E/K mutated melanoma
* Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1
* Signed and dated informed consent form
* No prior immunotherapy targeting CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1
* No prior BRAFi and/ or MEKi therapy
* No immunosuppressive medications
* Screening laboratory values must meet the following criteria and should be obtained within 10 days prior to randomization:
* WBC ≥ 2.0x109/L, Neutrophils ≥ 1.0x109/L, Platelets ≥ 100 x109/L, Hemoglobin ≥ 5.0 mmol/L
* Creatinine ≤ 2x ULN or creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 40 ml/min
* AST, ALT ≤ 3.0 x ULN (≤5 x ULN for patients with liver metastases)
* Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN (except subjects with Gilbert Syndrome, who can have total bilirubin \< 3.0 mg/dL )
* LDH \> ULN, \< 5.0 x ULN
* No symptomatic brain metastases (asysmptomatic brain metastases, accidentally found during screening can be included)
* No leptomeningeal metastases
* No active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment in the past 3 months or a documented history of autoimmune disease, or history of syndrome that required systemic steroids, at daily dose of ≥10mg prednisone or equivalent, or immunosuppressive medications. (Subjects with vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy are excluded from this rule (and will not be excluded from this study). Subjects that require intermittent use of bronchodilators or local steroid injections would not be excluded from the study. Subjects with hypothyroidism stable on hormone replacement or Sjorgen's syndrome will not be excluded from the study.)
* No evidence of interstitial lung disease or active, non-infectious pneumonitis
* No active infection requiring therapy
* No known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment
* Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must use appropriate method(s) of contraception. WOCBP should use an adequate method to avoid pregnancy for 23 weeks (30 days + the time required for nivolumab to undergo five half-lives) after the last dose of study medication
* WOBCP must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 96 hours prior to the start of study treatment and must not be breast feeding
* Men must agree to the use of male contraception during the study treatment period and for at least 31 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
* Currently not participating in a study of an investigational agent or using an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment.
* No underlying medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, will make the administration of study drug hazardous or obscure the interpretation of toxicity determination or adverse events
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
OTHER
Isala
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rutger Koornstra
Medical Oncologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda
Breda, , Netherlands
Maxima MC
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, , Netherlands
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Heerlen
Heerlen, , Netherlands
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, , Netherlands
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Isala
Zwolle, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MOMEL27 - COWBOY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.