Shared Decision-Making for the Promotion of Patient-Centered Imaging in the ED: Suspected Kidney Stones

NCT ID: NCT04234035

Last Updated: 2024-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-11

Study Completion Date

2024-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although a CT scan is required for some Emergency Department patients with signs and symptoms of a kidney stone, recent evidence has shown that routine scanning is unnecessary and may expose young patients to significant cumulative radiation, increasing their risk of future cancers. Shared Decision-Making may facilitate diagnostic imaging decisions that are more inline with patients' values and preferences. By comparing a shared approach to diagnostic decision-making to a traditional, physician-directed approach, this study lays the foundation for a future randomized trial that will reduce radiation exposure, improve engagement, and improve the quality and patient-centeredness of Emergency Department care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shared Decision-making Kidney Stone Emergencies Radiation Exposure Communication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shared Decision-Making (via Decision Aid)

The intervention is a decision aid, which both encourages and facilitates a shared decision-making conversation between the clinician and the patient. The decision aid educates patients regarding evidence-based approaches to the management of suspected kidney stones in the ED. Clinicians will receive training specific to this decision aid, though the decision aid is designed to be used with no additional training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decision Aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Decision aid to facilitated shared decision-making

Standardized Educational Material (informational pamphlet)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pamphlet with information about kidney stones

standardized educational intervention (pamphlet +usual care)

The control arm will receive Usual Care and a standardized educational intervention (pamphlet). This intervention (pamphlet) contains information about kidney stones. Usual care for this clinical scenario generally involves the clinician choosing the management plan. Clinicians of subjects assigned to the usual care group will be asked to practice usual, evidence-based medical care, without shared decision-making.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standardized Educational Material (informational pamphlet)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pamphlet with information about kidney stones

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision Aid

Decision aid to facilitated shared decision-making

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standardized Educational Material (informational pamphlet)

Pamphlet with information about kidney stones

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-55,
2. with acute flank pain - for whom clinician believes acute flank pain may be from renal colic
3. who are deemed by the treating clinician to be at low risk for dangerous alternative diagnoses.
4. Clinician is considering imaging patient for kidney stones (any imaging)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Recent trauma related to pain (including minor such as lifting/turning)
2. Pregnancy (previous or discovered during ED visit)
3. Recent surgical procedure on abdomen or pelvis (30d)
4. Recent urologic procedure (30d)
5. Recent childbirth (30d)
6. Signs of Systemic Infection: Fever \>100.9 (101 and up), SBP \<90, HR\>120
7. Moderate or severe abdominal tenderness or rebound/guarding, consistently present (present for more than one exam, or present after patient treated with pain medication)
8. Second doctor's visit (ED, PCP, urgent care) for THIS episode of pain (previous similar visits ok if pain gone for \>30d in between episodes) (if seen at PCP or urgent care in same day or 24 hour period, this is not an exclusion, but if seen at PCP/urgent care or ED 1-30 days prior to index visit, with same pain, excluded)
9. Known history of one kidney or other urological/renal abnormality (including neurogenic bladder, ESRD and paraplegia; or if solitary kidney discovered on US)
10. Known malignancy (any) within past year (or received treatment in the past 12 months)
11. Immunocompromised (chronic steroids, HIV, crohns, immunomodulators or severely ill chronically)
12. On anticoagulation
13. Crisis patient (behavioral health)/belligerent
14. Lacks capacity for medical decision-making
15. Unlikely to respond to follow-up calls (IVDA, homeless, no phone)
16. Clinician is concerned for alternative diagnosis requiring CT scan (appendicitis) (\>5% likelihood by clinician gestalt)
17. Patient is not improving clinically and clinician is considering admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baystate Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elizabeth Schoenfeld, MD

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth Schoenfeld, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baystate Medical Center

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Westafer LM, DiFronzo BM, Visintainer P, Scales CD, Hess EP, Lindenauer PK. Feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid for emergency department patients with suspected ureterolithiasis: protocol for an adaptive randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05140-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33691760 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BH-19-168

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Agent-Enhanced Document Explanation
NCT02668705 TERMINATED NA