Dedicated MR Imaging vs Surgical Staging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04231175
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
272 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-28
2023-10-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multi-modality Imaging in the Prediction of Response to Systemic Treatment in Colorectal Cancer
NCT01292681
Utility of PET In the Pre-Operative Assessment of Patients With Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
NCT00588549
Perioperative Systemic Therapy for Isolated Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
NCT02758951
Total Preoperative MR Diagnostic Evaluation Versus Standard Diagnostic Evaluation in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT01544452
Clinical Evaluation of PET-CT for Staging of Colorectal Lung Metastases
NCT02942901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OBJECTIVES The goal is to perform a multicenter randomized study to compare a less invasive diagnostic workup ARM A (with MRI and surgical inspection reserved for borderline operable cases on MRI) to the standard diagnostic workup (ARM B, without MRI, with surgical staging to determine resectability based on a MDT decision) of patients with (suspected) peritoneal metastases. Surgical staging laparoscopies may largely be replaced by MRI (only reserved as a problem solver for borderline operable cases in ARM A). If it will be proven that MRI is an accurate, robust and cost-effective staging tool than this will result in a more patient friendly diagnostic workup with less futile surgical procedures.
STUDY DESIGN 4-year multicenter randomized controlled trial
STUDY POPULATION N=272 patients suspected of synchronous or metachronous peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin who are considered for CRS-HIPEC after CT imaging.
EXPERIMENTAL (ARM A) CRS-HIPEC candidates are selected based on MRI and only in borderline cases a surgical inspection will be performed
CONTROL (ARM B) Standard work-up including computed tomography and surgical inspection as appropriate (based on a MDT decision).
MAIN STUDY PARAMETERS/ENDPOINTS
Primary outcome:
Number of preventable unnecessary laparoscopies and explorative laparotomies.
NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE BURDEN AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICIPATION, BENEFIT AND GROUP RELATEDNESS:
MRI is a standard diagnostic procedure without the use of radiation. The MR sequences, MR-contrast agents and Buscopan (to minimize peristaltic bowel movements) are all commonly used in daily clinical practice. In addition, patients will be asked to drink 1L of pineapple juice 1-2 hours before the MRI (to minimize signal in the bowel lumen and optimize image quality), which is standard procedure in many clinics for MRCP and MR enterography. By acting upon the MRI findings in the experimental arm A, could result into new risks as oppose to standard clinical practice. However by introducing the borderline group ('yellow light' group) to receive diagnostic laparoscopy will minimize the possibility of over-staging a patient that would have received a successful CRS/HIPEC in de control arm. In our internal pilot data of 87 patients considered for CRS/HIPEC, no patients with a PCI of above 24 ended up receiving successful CRS/HIPEC and only 4 of the 15 patients that could have been assigned to the borderline group (were the trail to have run at that time) received successful CRS/HIPEC.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
experimental arm A
patients will undergo dedicated MRI imaging of the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax. Based on the findings of the MRI scan patients will be allocated to one of the diagnostic/treatment options
DWI MRI of the pelvis, abdomen and thorax
Patients in Arm A will receive a MRI scan of their pelvis, abdomen, and thorax before possible surgery. During the MRI standard Gadolinium contrast agent and Buscopan is intravenously administered, which is standard clinical practice in abdominal MR imaging. Total scan time is 35 minutes and includes T2 weighted, T1 weighted, Diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the abdomen and the thorax. The findings of this scan will be used to determine whether to proceed with CRS/HIPEC, DLS and then possibly CRS-HIPEC, or palliative care.
arm B
patients will undergo the current standard diagnostic work-up of DLS at indication (MDT decision) and otherwise continue to CRS-HIPEC.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DWI MRI of the pelvis, abdomen and thorax
Patients in Arm A will receive a MRI scan of their pelvis, abdomen, and thorax before possible surgery. During the MRI standard Gadolinium contrast agent and Buscopan is intravenously administered, which is standard clinical practice in abdominal MR imaging. Total scan time is 35 minutes and includes T2 weighted, T1 weighted, Diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the abdomen and the thorax. The findings of this scan will be used to determine whether to proceed with CRS/HIPEC, DLS and then possibly CRS-HIPEC, or palliative care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* Written and signed informed consent
* WHO 0-2
* Able and willing to drink 1 liter of pineapple or blueberry juice
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have a heart pacemaker may not have an MRI scan
* Patients who have a metallic foreign body (metal sliver) in their body
* Patients with severe claustrophobia
* Ineligible to receive gadofosveset (Gadolinium) contrast (history of contrast allergy, impaired kidney function with a Glomerular Filtration Rate \<30 ml/min/1.73m2)
* Ineligible to receive Buscopan
* Allergy for pineapple juice and blueberry juice.
* Patients with clinical contraindications for CRS/HIPEC
* Patients with radiological contra-indications for CRS/HIPEC observed on CT thorax/abdomen
* Massive mesenteric or small bowel involvement which would lead to short bowel syndrome if adequately resected
* Extra-peritoneal metastases for which CRS/HIPEC is not justifiable (such as lung metastases, skeletal metastases, and liver metastases)
* Inoperable retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy
* Patients with a known additional malignancy, unless o treated with curative intent at least five years ago. in situ cancers, basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that have undergone potentially curative therapy within the past five years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
OTHER
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Max Lahaye, PhD MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Engbersen MP, Rijsemus CJV, Nederend J, Aalbers AGJ, de Hingh IHJT, Retel V, Lambregts DMJ, Van der Hoeven EJRJ, Boerma D, Wiezer MJ, De Vries M, Madsen EVE, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Van Koeverden S, De Reuver PR, Beets-Tan RGH, Kok NFM, Lahaye MJ. Dedicated MRI staging versus surgical staging of peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients considered for CRS-HIPEC; the DISCO randomized multicenter trial. BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08168-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M19DSC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.