The Diagnostic Value of Staging Laparoscopy and Computed Tomography Response Assessment in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma
NCT ID: NCT05013775
Last Updated: 2021-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
697 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-15
2021-05-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rationale: Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with computed tomography (CT) are two diagnostic modalities used to assess metastatic spread in gastric cancer patients. It is still unclear in what proportion of patients clinically relevant metastases or other significant findings (e.g. contra-indications of surgery) are detected that impact on the treatment.
Objective: To determine the clinical value of diagnostic laparoscopy and computed tomography response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Study design: Multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Study population: All Patients with gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent clinical staging and were discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) between January 2016 and December 2018.
Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is the proportion (%) of patients who do not proceed with treatment as planned after a DL and CT response assessment (i.e. the proportion of patients in which metastasized disease or other contra-indications for surgery is found).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Since this is an observational study, no burden or risks are associated with participation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of PET and Laparoscopy in STagIng Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03208621
The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT02902575
Elimination of Peritoneal Tumor Cells With Extensive Peritoneal Lavage During Surgery in Patients With Gastric Cancer
NCT01476553
Preoperative Imaging in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors
NCT05246319
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Stomach CAncer: a Feasibility Study
NCT03150628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computed tomography
Computed tomography to gauge response after preoperative chemotherapy cycles and excluded the development of interval metastases or irresectable disease
Diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage
Diagnostic laparoscopy lavage to exclude (small-volume) metastases and determine local resectability
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have had (either) DLS and/or CT response assessment (after chemotherapy).
* Discussed at MDT from January 2016 - December 2018
* ≥18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with recurrent/residual disease after earlier treatment of gastric cancer.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sander van Hootegem
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sander van Hootegem
Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC-2019-0284
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.