The Diagnostic Value of Staging Laparoscopy and Computed Tomography Response Assessment in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT05013775

Last Updated: 2021-08-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

697 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-15

Study Completion Date

2021-05-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

SUMMARY

Rationale: Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with computed tomography (CT) are two diagnostic modalities used to assess metastatic spread in gastric cancer patients. It is still unclear in what proportion of patients clinically relevant metastases or other significant findings (e.g. contra-indications of surgery) are detected that impact on the treatment.

Objective: To determine the clinical value of diagnostic laparoscopy and computed tomography response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Study design: Multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Study population: All Patients with gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent clinical staging and were discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) between January 2016 and December 2018.

Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is the proportion (%) of patients who do not proceed with treatment as planned after a DL and CT response assessment (i.e. the proportion of patients in which metastasized disease or other contra-indications for surgery is found).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Since this is an observational study, no burden or risks are associated with participation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computed tomography

Computed tomography to gauge response after preoperative chemotherapy cycles and excluded the development of interval metastases or irresectable disease

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage

Diagnostic laparoscopy lavage to exclude (small-volume) metastases and determine local resectability

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with histologically proven gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
* Patients who have had (either) DLS and/or CT response assessment (after chemotherapy).
* Discussed at MDT from January 2016 - December 2018
* ≥18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with the tumour bulk located in the oesophagus that receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation;
* Patients with recurrent/residual disease after earlier treatment of gastric cancer.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sander van Hootegem

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sander van Hootegem

Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC-2019-0284

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.