Tibiofemoral Mobilization in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT04225000

Last Updated: 2020-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-15

Study Completion Date

2020-01-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this research was to determine the effects of tibiofemoral joint mobilization in patients of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Tibiofemoral joint mobilization effects on pain and Range of Motion (ROM) in knee joint. A randomized controlled trial was done at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar and Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar. The sample size was 52. The Participants were divided into two groups, 26 participants in experimental group and 26 in control group. The study duration was 4 months. Sampling technique applied was purposive non probability sampling technique. Only 25 to 35 years participants with patellofemoral pain syndrome were included. Tools used in this study were Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Kujala Score Questionnaire, Goniometer and Algometer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is the most common overuse injury characterized by anterior and peripatellar knee pain, associated with physical activities in Active Daily Living (ADL) such as climbing stairs, squatting, jumping, and running and by sitting with the knees flexed for prolonged periods of time. It mainly affects young women without any structural changes such as increased Q-angle or significant pathological changes in articular cartilage. It mainly affects young women without any structural changes such as increased Q-angle or significant pathological changes in articular cartilage. Patellofemoral pain has prevalence of 23% in adults and 29% in adolescents annually in general population. Its incidence is higher in women as compare to men and is located at 22/1000 person per year. It accounts for 25-40% of all knee complaints in sports medicine. The prevalence of this problem is high because it can occur in patients with a wide range of physical activity levels.

The main symptom of PFPS is anterior knee pain or pain around and behind patella during patellofemoral joint loading activities. The pathophysiology of PFPS is multifactorial. External factors; change in training intensity and frequency, training surfaces and inappropriate shoe wear, while intrinsic factors includes muscle and soft tissue imbalance and malalignment of lower extremity and poor biomechanics of foot. In PFPS patients' dynamic valgus and patellar maltracking is common. Decrease strength of hip abductors, abnormal rear foot eversion can cause dynamic valgus. Further other muscles imbalance is also associated with PFPS i.e. vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, quadriceps, hamstring and iliotibial tract.

Correction of biomechanical imbalance and decreased anterior knee pain as therapeutic exercise has already been shown to be effective in the treatment of PFPS for pain and function. Conservative treatment involves a multimodal physiotherapy approach including patient education, activity modification, neuromuscular electric stimulation on quadriceps, therapeutic ultrasound, biofeedback, exercises for enhancing the activity of Vastus Medialis Obliquus (VMO) muscle, lower extremity-strengthening exercises, and proximal stabilization, stretching exercises on tight structures, bracings, foot orthoses, patellar mobilization and taping techniques. Patellofemoral pain syndrome is treated through conservative methods from long period of time but

tibiofemoral mobilization is not practiced very much while standard mobilization is patellar mobilization, it can be painful to mobilize patella. So the goal of this study is determine the effect of reciprocal joint mobilization i.e. tibiofemoral joint mobilization in patellofemoral joint pain syndrome and enhance the awareness of this in practice.

Literature review A systematic and evidence based search of relevant literature was performed by utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as search engines. Search term for the initial literature review was patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Tibiofemoral mobilization, prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome, causes of PFPS, pathophysiology of PFPS, treatment option for PFPS, conservative treatment of PFPS, short term effect of Tibiofemoral mobilization, exercise protocol of PFPS. The search was limited to papers in English preferably published since 2010 with full text available. Different studies were available regarding PFPS but limited data were available regarding tibiofemoral mobilization in PFPS.

A consensus statement (2018) on exercise therapy and physical interventions and mentioned that it is recommended that exercise targeting the hip and knee is a key component of management for all patients with patellofemoral pain, particularly when used in combination.

A consensus statement (2016) from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, that exercises are best to treat PFPS in short medium and long term goal and also mentioned that instead of only giving exercises of knee alone if combined hip and knee exercises would be given to patient it will show great effect.

The short-term effects of Movement With Mobilization (MWM) and Kinesio Tapping practices performed in addition to the exercises proved to be similar to one another.

The tibiofemoral joint manipulation with exercises for home plane give a successful results in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome.

A systemic review mentioned that the different combinations of Manual Therapy (MT) and physical therapy analyzed in this review suggest that giving more emphasis to proximal stabilization and full kinetic chain treatments in PFPS will help better alleviation of symptoms.

Another study concluded that interventions directed at the lumbopelvic region did not have immediate effects on quadriceps force output or activation. Muscle fatigue might have contributed to decreased force output and activation over 1 hour of testing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Control Trail
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exercise Group

Hip \& Knee Exercises

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exercise Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group included 6 different exercises to treat participants having PFPS. These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. These all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This exercise protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.

Mobilization Group

Tibiofemoral joint anterior-posterior mobilization combined Hip \& Knee Exercises

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mobilization Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Experimental group included Anterior-Posterior (AP) tibiofemoral joint mobilization and all 6 exercises suggested controlled group for treating participants having PFPS; 3 sessions of mobilizations per week and total 4 weeks.

These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. Theses all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise Group

Control group included 6 different exercises to treat participants having PFPS. These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. These all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This exercise protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Mobilization Group

Experimental group included Anterior-Posterior (AP) tibiofemoral joint mobilization and all 6 exercises suggested controlled group for treating participants having PFPS; 3 sessions of mobilizations per week and total 4 weeks.

These exercises included Semi squat with hip adduction and internal rotation, Quads isometrics, Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Hamstring Stretch, Terminal knee extension with elastic band , Adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball), Hip abduction in standing with elastic band. Theses all exercises were advised to perform 3 x 15 Repetitions with 10 sec hold. This protocol was for 4 weeks and 3 sessions per week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Symptoms of anterior knee pain for at least 1 month.
* Anterior or retropatellar knee pain on at least 2 of the following activities: prolonged sitting, climbing stairs, squatting, running, kneeling, and hopping/jumping.
* Presence of 2 of the following clinical criteria on assessment: pain during apprehension test, pain during the patellar compression test, and crepitation during the compression test.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous knee surgery or arthritis
* History of patellar dislocation or subluxation, malalignment, or ligament laxity
* Spinal referred pain
* History of other abnormalities such as leg length inequalities (.2 cm)
* Medication as a part of the treatment
* Previous physical therapy or acupuncture treatment for the knee within the previous 30 days.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Saira Waqqar, PP-DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lady Reading Hospital

Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Collins NJ, Barton CJ, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino BT, Davis IS, Powers CM, Macri EM, Hart HF, de Oliveira Silva D, Crossley KM. 2018 Consensus statement on exercise therapy and physical interventions (orthoses, taping and manual therapy) to treat patellofemoral pain: recommendations from the 5th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Gold Coast, Australia, 2017. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;52(18):1170-1178. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099397. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29925502 (View on PubMed)

Briani RV, Pazzinatto MF, De Oliveira Silva D, Azevedo FM. Different pain responses to distinct levels of physical activity in women with patellofemoral pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28460712 (View on PubMed)

Crossley KM, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, Collins NJ, Rathleff MS, Barton CJ. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 2: recommended physical interventions (exercise, taping, bracing, foot orthoses and combined interventions). Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):844-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096268. Epub 2016 May 31. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27247098 (View on PubMed)

Santos TR, Oliveira BA, Ocarino JM, Holt KG, Fonseca ST. Effectiveness of hip muscle strengthening in patellofemoral pain syndrome patients: a systematic review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):167-76. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0089. Epub 2015 May 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26039034 (View on PubMed)

Demirci S, Kinikli GI, Callaghan MJ, Tunay VB. Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29054803 (View on PubMed)

Lantz JM, Emerson-Kavchak AJ, Mischke JJ, Courtney CA. TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT MOBILIZATION IN THE SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;11(3):450-61.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27274430 (View on PubMed)

Fatimah I, Waqqar S. Effects of tibiofemoral mobilization in patients of Patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(11):2506-2510. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.04-585.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34783726 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/00567 Ishrat

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.