Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-01
2021-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Lateral bone augmentation procedures with guided bone regeneration (GBR) are well documented in the literature with predictable results. It generally involves bone substitute xenograft and bioresorbable membrane combined with implant placement in single stage procedure or separately in two- stage procedure. As the search for better and improved materials continues, a porcine derived ribose cross-linked volumising collagen matrix (VCMX) based on GLYMATRIX® technology has been introduced which showed benefits over the conventional membranes in terms of simplified procedure, degradation, membrane exposure and healing. The collagen scaffold has been reportedly used as a core material for guided bone regeneration, when there is sufficient bone to place an implant but a horizontal defect is present in the crestal ridge. As part of augmentation VCMX is designed to expand and ossify during healing. The advantage of the material is that when placed in one or two layers, it may eliminate the use of bone substitute or connective tissue graft thus simplifying the augmentation procedure. In addition, adding a bone substitute is a valid option based on indication.
In the quest of better material and simplified procedures, few authors have performed case studies based on application of VCMX for guided bone regeneration around dental implants and has shown promising results. However, there are no controlled clinical trials on application of VCMX for lateral ridge augmentation. Thus, the present study aims to assess the efficiency of VCMX compared to resorbable collagen membrane (RCM) and bone graft (BG) for lateral ridge augmentation around implants through a well designed, controlled clinical trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Cross-linked or Non-cross-linked Collagen Membrane
NCT04402671
Comparison of Autogenous Dentin Matrix Versus Bovine-Derived Xenograft for Socket Preservation
NCT04239378
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334
Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Two Graft Combination and a Cross-linked Collagen Membrane
NCT06523686
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Method of collection of data Sample Size The study would be a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. A sample size of 28 subjects with equal number of males and females who are eligible as per the inclusion criteria, belonging to 20 - 50 years of age group would be considered for the study. Sample size is calculated using online software (OpenEpi) Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 3.01. Estimation is done considering a similar previous study to acquire 80% power and 5% type 1 error in power calculation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Resorbable collagen membrane and bone graft
Subjects will receive bovine derived bone graft and resorbable collagen membrane for augmentation.
Resorbable Collagen membrane with bone graft for augmentation
Local anaesthesia Lignocaine and Adrenaline 1:80000 Injection (Lignox® 2% A, Indoco remedies Ltd, Mumbai) will be administered and midcrestal incison will be made and full thickness flap would be raised buccally. To obtain tension free adaptation of flap margins, the buccal flap advancement will be done using periosteal releasing incision. Implant osteotomies will be performed with sequential drilling and with standardised drills. All the subjects will receive the same implant system. (Norris medical ltd. Hatasia street, Nesher, Israel) For augmentation of deficient ridge, bovine bone graft will be place with overlying resorbable collagen membrane. Stabilisation would be achieved with internal resorbable horizontal mattress suture.
The tension free flap margins will be adapted around the healing abutment with simple interrupted Vicryl 4.0, 3/8, reverse cutting resorbable sutures (Ethicon, Hamburg, Germany)
Ribose cross-linked collagen matrix
Subjects will receive ribose cross linked collagen matrix for augmentation
Ribose cross linked collagen matrix for augmentation
Local anaesthesia Lignocaine and Adrenaline 1:80000 Injection (Lignox® 2% A, Indoco remedies Ltd, Mumbai) will be administered and midcrestal incison will be made and full thickness flap would be raised buccally. To obtain tension free adaptation of flap margins, the buccal flap advancement will be done using periosteal releasing incision.
Implant osteotomies will be performed with sequential drilling and with standardised drills. All the subjects will receive the same implant system. (Norris medical ltd. Hatasia street, Nesher, Israel) For augmentation of deficient ridge, ribose cross linked collagen matrix will be cut and adapted to the buccal wall and ridge around the buccal aspect of healing abutment. Stabilisation would be achieved with internal resorbable horizontal mattress suture.
The tension free flap margins will be adapted around the healing abutment with simple interrupted 4.0, 3/8, reverse cutting resorbable sutures (Ethicon, Hamburg, Germany).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Resorbable Collagen membrane with bone graft for augmentation
Local anaesthesia Lignocaine and Adrenaline 1:80000 Injection (Lignox® 2% A, Indoco remedies Ltd, Mumbai) will be administered and midcrestal incison will be made and full thickness flap would be raised buccally. To obtain tension free adaptation of flap margins, the buccal flap advancement will be done using periosteal releasing incision. Implant osteotomies will be performed with sequential drilling and with standardised drills. All the subjects will receive the same implant system. (Norris medical ltd. Hatasia street, Nesher, Israel) For augmentation of deficient ridge, bovine bone graft will be place with overlying resorbable collagen membrane. Stabilisation would be achieved with internal resorbable horizontal mattress suture.
The tension free flap margins will be adapted around the healing abutment with simple interrupted Vicryl 4.0, 3/8, reverse cutting resorbable sutures (Ethicon, Hamburg, Germany)
Ribose cross linked collagen matrix for augmentation
Local anaesthesia Lignocaine and Adrenaline 1:80000 Injection (Lignox® 2% A, Indoco remedies Ltd, Mumbai) will be administered and midcrestal incison will be made and full thickness flap would be raised buccally. To obtain tension free adaptation of flap margins, the buccal flap advancement will be done using periosteal releasing incision.
Implant osteotomies will be performed with sequential drilling and with standardised drills. All the subjects will receive the same implant system. (Norris medical ltd. Hatasia street, Nesher, Israel) For augmentation of deficient ridge, ribose cross linked collagen matrix will be cut and adapted to the buccal wall and ridge around the buccal aspect of healing abutment. Stabilisation would be achieved with internal resorbable horizontal mattress suture.
The tension free flap margins will be adapted around the healing abutment with simple interrupted 4.0, 3/8, reverse cutting resorbable sutures (Ethicon, Hamburg, Germany).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients indicated for implant placement
3. Based on SAC classification (Straight forward, Advanced, Complex), if the bone defect has at least two walls intact and implant placement is possible within the confines of ridge.10 In the present study, subjects belonging to Advanced category i.e., where simultaneous guided bone regeneration and implant placement is possible it would be considered.
4. Full mouth plaque score (FMPS) \< 20 %, Full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \< 20 %.11
5. Ability to comply with the study related procedures such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up examinations.
6. Ability to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and ability to sign the informed consent form.
\-
Exclusion Criteria
2. Probing depth \>4 mm
3. General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment
4. History of malignancy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for malignancy within the past 5 yrs
5. Pregnancy or breast feeding
6. Previous and concurrent medication affecting mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs)
7. History of any allergic diseases -
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Prabhuji MLV
Professor and Head of the Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prabhuji MLV, MDS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences
Karthikeyan Bangalore Varadhan, MDS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Prabhuji MLV, MDS
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Friedmann A, Gissel K, Soudan M, Kleber BM, Pitaru S, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled trial on lateral augmentation using two collagen membranes: morphometric results on mineralized tissue compound. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jul;38(7):677-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01738.x. Epub 2011 May 10.
Zubery Y, Nir E, Goldlust A. Ossification of a collagen membrane cross-linked by sugar: a human case series. J Periodontol. 2008 Jun;79(6):1101-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070421.
Smidt A, Gutmacher Z, Sharon E. A nouveau collagen scaffold to simplify lateral augmentation of deficient ridges between natural teeth. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(7):576-582. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42652.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02_D012_101329
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.