Analysis of Vestibular Compensation Following Clinical Intervention for Vestibular Schwannoma

NCT ID: NCT04196933

Last Updated: 2025-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-05

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multiple sensory cues are typically generated by discrete events, and while they do not reach the cerebrum simultaneously, the brain can bind them temporally if they are interpreted as corresponding to a single event. The temporal binding of vestibular and non-vestibular sensory cues is poorly understood and has not been studied in detail, despite the fact that the vestibular system operates in an inherently multimodal environment. In this study, the researchers are investigating the physiology and pathophysiology of vestibular temporal binding by studying normal subjects, patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction, and patients with vestibular and cochlear signals provided by prosthetic implants in the inner ear.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multiple sensory cues are generated by discrete events (e.g., the vestibular-visual signals after hitting a pothole) and while they do not reach the cerebrum simultaneously, the brain can synthesize them if they are interpreted as corresponding to a single event. This is critical because the central representation of an event is improved if two or more relevant cues are integrated but conversely is degraded if unrelated inputs are synthesized. Little research has focused on temporal binding of vestibular signals with other sensory cues, even though the vestibular system operates in an inherently multimodal environment, and virtually nothing is known about temporal binding abnormalities in patients with peripheral or central vestibular disorders. The investigators will use psychophysical tests (quantifying the PSS \[point of subjective simultaneity\] and TBW \[temporal binding window\]) to study vestibular temporal binding in normal people, patients with combined vestibular and cochlear prostheses, and patients with peripheral or central vestibular dysfunction. The researchers will investigate two fundamental aspects of temporal binding: its dependence on signal precision and adaptation driven by habitual exposure to sensory patterns. Furthermore, the researchers will investigate how and why temporal binding differs from normal in patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine Vestibular Migraine Vestibular Schwannoma Motion Sickness Dizziness Vestibular Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normal Controls

normal control subjects - no history of neurologic or inner ear disease

The investigators will characterize vestibular spatial and temporal precision by calculating perceptual thresholds for vestibular (yaw rotation) stimuli in normal subjects over a wide age range. Vestibular-visual temporal binding is then performed on each subject and the relationship between the principal parameters (vestibular perceptual thresholds \[inversely related to spatial precision\] and the PSS and TBW from the temporal binding paradigm) will be examined. The investigators will collect qualitative assessments of dizziness/disbalance (DHI: dizziness handicap index) and quantitative measurements of balance and vestibular function (FGA: functional gait analysis, postural sway, and standard rotational testing - VOR gain, time constant, asymmetry).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Central Vestibular Dysfunction

Migraine and Vestibular Migraine patients

The investigators intend to evaluate vestibular (yaw rotation) - visual temporal binding in people with a wide range of motion sickness sensitivities (as quantified with standard questionnaires), including normal subjects, people with migraine and with vestibular migraine.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Peripheral Vestibular Dysfunction

Vestibular Schwannoma patients

The basic approach is to characterize the precision of their vestibular information (i.e., perceptual thresholds for spatial precision), and their temporal binding characteristics for vestibular (yaw rotation)-visual inputs, in three states: pre-op, sub-acute post-op (2-6 weeks), and chronic post-op (6 months+). At each state the investigators will also assess the quality of their vestibular-mediated behaviors through questionnaires (e.g. DHI), postural sway, functional gait analysis, and standard rotational testing (VOR gain, time constant, and asymmetry).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Implant Subjects

Cochlear Implant (CI)/Vestibular Implant (VI) patients

A causative role for vestibular precision in temporal binding will be investigated in the VI patients, since the noise characteristics of the vestibular channel will be varied and to determine how this affects thresholds and temporal binding. As part of a second aim, the investigators will use VI and CI prosthetic signals in patients who have never received them together to see how the brain process sensory cues to which it is essentially naïve. Finally, after the acute experiments the investigators will provide 8 hours of 'physiologic' VI and CI stimulation by turning both implants on, sound modulates activity in the CI as usual, and angular head motion modulates activity in the VI while the subject actively explores the hospital environment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Temporal Binding Adaptation - PSS adaptation with VI stimulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The adaptation will utilize the same approach used in non-implanted patients. The investigators will provide a repeated, fixed SOA with either the CI or VI leading the other stimulus by 220 ms. After the training period, which will match the number of stimuli pairs provided to our normal vestibular-auditory control subjects undergoing PSS adaptation, the TOJ study is repeated to recalculate the PSS and TBW.

Chronic Motion-modulated Stimulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

To provide 8 hours of 'physiologic' CI and VI inputs during normal activities, the investigators will employ standard motion-modulated stimulation with the VI. This requires pre-adaptation to a 200 pps tonic stimulation rate (to emulate the push-pull design of the native vestibular system allowing modulating stimulation upward or downward with opposite directions of motion). The three electrodes are connected to the head-mounted prosthetic circuit, which consists of three angular velocity sensors (one aligned with the sensitive axis of each canal) such that head rotations in the plane of the given canal modulate the stimulation rate of the corresponding electrode, upward (for ipsi) or downward (for contralateral) head rotations, thereby simulating normal canal-mediated modulations.

Post-op Vestibular Schwannoma patients

Vestibular Schwannoma patients who are 6mos+ post-surgery (for removal of vestibular schwannoma, resulting in 8th nerve being cut \& complete loss of peripheral vestibular signals from affected ear). While many post-op VS patients recover well, some continue to have persistent problems with balance and symptoms of dizziness. This study will explore how/whether PSS adaptation may improve vestibular clinical outcomes such as improved gait and dizziness symptoms following gait with horizontal (yaw) head motion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Temporal Binding Adaptation - PSS training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

After the PSS and TBW are calculated with the standard TOJ paradigm, 100 training trials are provided where the SOA is set to a PSS slightly greater than what was the mean calculated for normal subjects, with the goal of shifting the PSS in a direction associated with better clinical vestibular parameters and vestibular precision measurements (e.g. standard rotational testing VOR time constant, lower DHI, higher FGA score) . Then the TOJ task will be repeated but every 10 testing trials will be followed by 10 training trials (SOA = PSS desired or mean normal PSS), and this pattern will be repeated 10 times to 100 more training trials interspersed with the Post TOJ data. Subjects will respond after all trials and testing and training will not be distinguished. After this is completed, the new PSS and TBW are calculated. Sham PSS training will be identical to the above except that the 'training' period will consist of random SOAs rather than a series of fixed SOAs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Temporal Binding Adaptation - PSS training

After the PSS and TBW are calculated with the standard TOJ paradigm, 100 training trials are provided where the SOA is set to a PSS slightly greater than what was the mean calculated for normal subjects, with the goal of shifting the PSS in a direction associated with better clinical vestibular parameters and vestibular precision measurements (e.g. standard rotational testing VOR time constant, lower DHI, higher FGA score) . Then the TOJ task will be repeated but every 10 testing trials will be followed by 10 training trials (SOA = PSS desired or mean normal PSS), and this pattern will be repeated 10 times to 100 more training trials interspersed with the Post TOJ data. Subjects will respond after all trials and testing and training will not be distinguished. After this is completed, the new PSS and TBW are calculated. Sham PSS training will be identical to the above except that the 'training' period will consist of random SOAs rather than a series of fixed SOAs.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Temporal Binding Adaptation - PSS adaptation with VI stimulation

The adaptation will utilize the same approach used in non-implanted patients. The investigators will provide a repeated, fixed SOA with either the CI or VI leading the other stimulus by 220 ms. After the training period, which will match the number of stimuli pairs provided to our normal vestibular-auditory control subjects undergoing PSS adaptation, the TOJ study is repeated to recalculate the PSS and TBW.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Chronic Motion-modulated Stimulation

To provide 8 hours of 'physiologic' CI and VI inputs during normal activities, the investigators will employ standard motion-modulated stimulation with the VI. This requires pre-adaptation to a 200 pps tonic stimulation rate (to emulate the push-pull design of the native vestibular system allowing modulating stimulation upward or downward with opposite directions of motion). The three electrodes are connected to the head-mounted prosthetic circuit, which consists of three angular velocity sensors (one aligned with the sensitive axis of each canal) such that head rotations in the plane of the given canal modulate the stimulation rate of the corresponding electrode, upward (for ipsi) or downward (for contralateral) head rotations, thereby simulating normal canal-mediated modulations.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Normal subjects

* normal vestibular-oculomotor exams
* normal low-frequency standard rotational testing
* normal hearing

Migraine

* meets International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine with or without aura
* tested more than 2 weeks after most recent migraine headache

Vestibular Migraine

* meets Barany Society criteria for vestibular migraine, which includes:
* episodic vestibular symptoms that occur with headaches that meet the IHS criteria for migraine
* tested more than 2 weeks after most recent migraine headache or vestibular episode

Vestibular Schwannoma

* existence of unilateral vestibular schwannoma (pre \& post clinical intervention e.g. surgical resection)
* must plan to have clinical intervention such as sub-occipital surgical approach with complete sectioning of the vestibular nerve
* rotational testing to assess pre-surgical vestibular function
* audiogram
* brain MRI consistent with vestibular schwannoma
* audiography in each ear

Vestibular (VI) and Cochlear (CI) Implant subjects

* scheduled for CI surgery because of deafness
* minimum 5 year history of documented absence of auditory and vestibular function, based on review of their audiograms and vestibular tests
* specific vestibular criteria: peak ice water caloric response of less than 3deg/s for each ear; yaw VOR time constant \<3s and gain \<0.25; and reduced head impulse gain (\<0.25) for all canal planes
* specific audiographic criteria: 80dB or greater sensorineural hearing loss in both ears

Exclusion Criteria

Normal subjects

* history of otologic or neurologic disease
* on vestibular suppressant medication (benzodiazepine, antihistamine, anticholinergic)
* pregnant or recently (\<6mos) pregnant

Migraine

* history of vestibular symptoms (other than motion sickness)
* evidence of other neurologic or otologic dysfunction
* on migraine prophylactic medications
* on vestibular suppressant medication (benzodiazepine, antihistamine, anticholinergic)

Vestibular Migraine (VM)

* other neurologic or otologic dysfunction as defined above except for central eye movement findings that are consistent with VM and therefore not exclusionary.
* on migraine prophylactic medication
* on vestibular suppressant medication (benzodiazepine, antihistamine, anticholinergic)

Vestibular Schwannoma

* other otologic disease (other than presbycusis) or any neurologic disease (other than migraine)
* on vestibular suppressant medication (benzodiazepine, antihistamine, anticholinergic)
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Geneva, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Richard Lewis

Associate Professor, Otolaryngology and Neurology; Director, Jenks Vestibular Laboratory

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01DC017425-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2018P003117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.