Efficacy of Lumbar Immobilisation by Rigid Brace for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Modic 1 Changes (DICO)

NCT ID: NCT04191161

Last Updated: 2022-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-12

Study Completion Date

2022-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic low back pain may be associated with active discopathy. This subset of individuals are defined by a clinical and radiological syndrome with specific MRI signals, known as MODIC changes.

Three types (I, II and III) of MODIC changes are described. Type I refers to the inflammatory reaction regarding the intervertebral-disc subchondral bone and adjacent vertebral-endplate subchondral bone. The natural evolution of this active discopathy will lead to sclerosis (type III) supposedly less painful. So far the underlying mechanism remains unclear and debated (mechanical, local infection, genetic). In the absence of international guidelines on the management on chronic low back pain with MC type 1, different therapeutic strategies have been described. The main goal is to accelerate the transition to MC type 2, which is supposedly less painful. The estimated time to expect a transition from type 1 to type 2 is at least 1 year.

The mechanical hypothesis found its origin in the Modic et al. initial study, linking Modic changes (MC) types 1 and 2 to degenerative disc disease.

The Histological analysis of patient suffering from active discopathy has shown signs of micro fractures regarding vertebral endplates. The local inflammatory reaction may be part of a repair process following the micro fracture. Based on this mechanical explanation an orthopaedic treatment with a lumbar brace may accelerate the healing, thus the transition from modic I to type II. This approach has been studied in a retrospective analysis on 62 patients suffering from active discopathy (modic type I) who were prescribed a custom lumbar rigid brace for 3 months, at endpoint 80% of the patients treated described a reduction of at least 30% of their initial pain.

This study aims to confirm the previous hypothesis, that lumbar immobilisation by custom rigid brace can reduce the pain after being worn for 3 months. Secondary objective will be to assess the pain reduction at 6 months along with functional outcome, fears and beliefs, mood and medical costs at short (3 months) and mid (6months) term.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a 2 parallel group multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients will undergo 3 consultations with the physician, based on the usual follow up for this pathology. During the first consultation the physician will check the inclusion criteria, medical history, clinical data relative to the different outcomes, and prescribe optimizated pain killers and deliver information about self care and physical activity. Patient reported outcome measures will be assessed through self answering questionnaires with the help of a research assistant if necessary. After randomisation the prosthetist will take the measurement to conceive the custom brace. Patients will then be re-examined during a 2nd consultation 3 month later to assess the main outcome (pain reduction) and other secondary outcome (proms). A third consultation will be organised 6 months later for secondary outcome (pain reduction and proms).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be recruited if aged between 18 and 55 years old and suffering from chronic lumbar pain (Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) \> 3) associated with Modic type I changes diagnosed with a MRI achieved less than 6 months before the consultation and interpreted by a radiologist specialised in spine disease. Patients must also be capable of giving a clear consent. Will not be included patients suffering from other types of Modic change, or any other cause of back pain such as spondylolisthesis, fracture, spondylitis, scoliosis, rheumatoid arthritis and also patient not willing to wear the brace for at least 3 months. Patients will be recruited from the consultation in PMR units across 5 centres in France.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Brace group

patients will receive their brace 2 weeks after the first consultation (usual delay to conceive and deliver the brace), they will be asked to wear the brace all day and will be allowed to redraw it at night. Brace must be worn for 3 months. A specific eduction on how to wear the brace will also be delivered. A thermal sensor chip will be placed in the brace to assess the observance. No physiotherapy will be prescribed during this period. Patient will attend to 3 consultations, day 0, 3 months and finally at 6 months later. These three consultations are part of usual care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Wearing the rigid brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Custom braces are made from 4mm thick polyethylene with Velcro® fastening. They are Computer Aided Designed and are made by the same manufacturer (LAGARRIGUE). A thermal sensor chip will placed in the brace to assess observance.

Control group

patients will continue physiotherapy sessions if already prescribed but no extra sessions will be prescribed. Pain killers will be adjusted. Patients will also attend to three consultations such as described above. Main outcome will be assessed at M3. After M3, patients who did not receive the brace will have the choice to receive it for the next 3 months and secondary outcome will be assessed at 6 months.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Wearing the rigid brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Custom braces are made from 4mm thick polyethylene with Velcro® fastening. They are Computer Aided Designed and are made by the same manufacturer (LAGARRIGUE). A thermal sensor chip will placed in the brace to assess observance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Wearing the rigid brace

Custom braces are made from 4mm thick polyethylene with Velcro® fastening. They are Computer Aided Designed and are made by the same manufacturer (LAGARRIGUE). A thermal sensor chip will placed in the brace to assess observance.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-- Age: \> 18 years \< 55 years

* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme ( beneficiary entitled )
* Patient has given its consent in writing to participate in the study
* Low back pain associated with a MODIC I signal at the lumbar stage objectified by an MRI dated less than 6 months and confirmed by a radiologist.

Exclusion Criteria

* Other types of Modic change
* Other cause of back pain such as spondylolisthesis, fracture, spondylitis, scoliosis, rheumatoid arthritis and also
* Patient not willing to wear the brace for at least 3 months
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emmanuel Coudeyre

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-A00861-56

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RBHP 2019 COUDEYRE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain
NCT02089139 TERMINATED NA