Benefit of Lumbar Bracing for Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT ID: NCT03484403
Last Updated: 2024-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-14
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate if a back brace provides any additive benefit to usual care consisting of exercise and patient education in patients with CLBP due to degenerative disc disease.
Specific Aim 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of back brace to improve pain and patient-reported functional measures in patients with uncomplicated CLBP due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Hypothesis 1. Back brace in addition to usual care will provide statistically significant improvement in pain and functional measures compared to usual care alone.
Specific Aim 2. To evaluate the adherence to back brace wear instructions in patients with uncomplicated CLBP due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy Hypothesis 2. Patients with CLBP, due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy, who are prescribed a back brace, will demonstrate clinically acceptable rates of adherence to brace wear instructions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Rehabilitation Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Prospective Randomized Study
NCT02435485
Restoration of Disc Height Reduces Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT00828880
Evaluation of Efficacy and Comfort: A Trial on the Incrediwear Back Brace in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain
NCT06126887
The Effect Spinal Bracing System on Gait in Adult Scoliosis Patients
NCT03572855
Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT01263054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A Cochrane review on the role of lumbar supports in treating chronic LBP revealed that limited evidence was available, which led to the conclusion that, "it remains unclear whether lumbar supports are more effective than no or other interventions for treating low-back pain." The research emphasized the need for high quality randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness of back braces, and also recommended that compliance of brace wear be monitored.
The mechanism by which back braces might help patients with CLBP is also unclear. The semi-rigid design of the commonly used back brace does not mechanically limit movement enough to suggest that movement limitation is the mechanism by which back braces provide relief. However, some studies have suggested that back braces help patients with CLBP by providing postural support or a kinesthetic reminder of their posture. Using posturography, Munoz et al., studied the forces applied by lumbar bracing and concluded that back braces seem to help by improving the quality of balance strategy used by the patient. Another mechanism by which back braces are believed to help patients is by providing warmth underneath the brace.
There is poor published information regarding adherence to instructions (compliance) about the use of back braces. Based on the investigators' anecdotal clinical experience, adherence rates vary widely among patients who are prescribed back braces, ranging from non-use to constant use around the clock. Poor adherence to instructions can be a significant factor resulting in inconclusive evidence supporting the role of back brace in patients with CLBP. A recent study showed that a strong predictor for consistent adherence to back brace usage was a positive attitude towards it. In this study, positive attitude towards the back brace explained 41% of the variance in outcomes. In addition, investigators found that perceived benefit from the brace outweighed any subjective discomfort.
Back braces have been used as adjunctive therapy in addition to other conservative care options. A recent study evaluated the cumulative effect of bracing to exercise and found that bracing helps to increase trunk stiffness and augments muscle contractions, which may remind the patients to better comply with exercise instructions. This suggested a potential synergistic effect of bracing and exercise in the management of patients with CLBP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Study participants will not receive a back brace but will receive back school education and the same physical therapy exercise instruction as the treatment group.
Back school
Back school consists of patient education physical therapy exercise instruction.
Treatment Group
Study participants in this group will receive a lumbar support back brace and will receive back school education and the same physical therapy exercise instruction as the control group.
Lumbar back brace
A brace that supports the lumbar region of the spine.
Back school
Back school consists of patient education physical therapy exercise instruction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar back brace
A brace that supports the lumbar region of the spine.
Back school
Back school consists of patient education physical therapy exercise instruction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Low back pain \> 6 weeks
* Uncomplicated low back pain without symptoms of pain radiating below the knee
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurogenic claudication
* Spondylolisthesis with instability
* Previous lumbar spine surgery
* Recent (\<1 year) brace use or physical therapy program
* No active psychiatric illness
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aspen Medical Products
OTHER
Dallas VA Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thiru Annaswamy
Professor, PM&R, Principal Investigator, Staff Physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thiru Annaswamy, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dallas VA Medical Center
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Keeffe M, Nolan D, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Fersum K, O'Sullivan K. Re: Aleksiev AR. Ten-year follow-up of strengthening versus flexibility exercises with or without abdominal bracing in recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 15;39(24):E1495-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000620. No abstract available.
Roelofs PD, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar supports for home care workers with recurrent low back pain: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized-controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26):E1619-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf7244.
Munoz F, Salmochi JF, Faouen P, Rougier P. Low back pain sufferers: is standing postural balance facilitated by a lordotic lumbar brace? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Jun;96(4):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
van Duijvenbode IC, Jellema P, van Poppel MN, van Tulder MW. Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823.pub3.
Pennick V, Liddle SD. Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;(8):CD001139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001139.pub3.
Calmels P, Queneau P, Hamonet C, Le Pen C, Maurel F, Lerouvreur C, Thoumie P. Effectiveness of a lumbar belt in subacute low back pain: an open, multicentric, and randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):215-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819577dc.
Podichetty VK, Varley ES. Re: Oleske D M, Lavender S A, Andersson G B, et al. Are back supports plus education more effective than education alone in promoting recovery from low back pain? Results from a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2007;32:2050-7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 1;33(3):349-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816244db. No abstract available.
Annaswamy TM, Cunniff KJ, Kroll M, Yap L, Hasley M, Lin CK, Petrasic J. Lumbar Bracing for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 1;100(8):742-749. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001743.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-088
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.