Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
60 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2020-02-01
Study Completion Date
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most frequent cause of motor disability worldwide, with a prevalence of 2-2.5 per 1000 live births. Children with CP may experience a variety of difficulties with communication including speech. Communication impairment has been identified in at least 40% of children with CP, with 36-90% of CP children experiencing motor speech impairment.
The aims of the current project are to test the effectiveness of intensive PROMPT treatment in a group of preschool children with CP and motor speech disorders (dysarthria/apraxia of speech) and to evaluate differences to the intervention response according to CP type, brain lesion severity and white matter integrity of corticospinal tract. We hypothesize that children with CP and motor speech disorders will benefit from 3 weeks of daily administration of PROMPT treatment and show measurable improvement of speech intelligibility on clinical and kinematic assessments, with 3 months stability. Outcome measures will include a standardized speech motor assessment as well as improvement in kinematic speech measures detected by a computerized system. We also hypothesize that children with dyskynetic CP will show more improvement induced by the PROMPT treatment as compared to children with spastic CP. We finally hypothesize that corticospinal microstructural integrity positively impact on intelligibility recovery, with children with better integrity having bigger improvements.
Our study of PROMPT with children with varying types of CP meets current international priorities of testing and implementing effective, earlier interventions, therefore investing in the improvement infant's health based on evidence, as a future investment for individuals and the community.
The aims of the current project are to test the effectiveness of intensive PROMPT treatment in a group of preschool children with CP and motor speech disorders (dysarthria/apraxia of speech) and to evaluate differences to the intervention response according to CP type, brain lesion severity and white matter integrity of corticospinal tract. We hypothesize that children with CP and motor speech disorders will benefit from 3 weeks of daily administration of PROMPT treatment and show measurable improvement of speech intelligibility on clinical and kinematic assessments, with 3 months stability. Outcome measures will include a standardized speech motor assessment as well as improvement in kinematic speech measures detected by a computerized system. We also hypothesize that children with dyskynetic CP will show more improvement induced by the PROMPT treatment as compared to children with spastic CP. We finally hypothesize that corticospinal microstructural integrity positively impact on intelligibility recovery, with children with better integrity having bigger improvements.
Our study of PROMPT with children with varying types of CP meets current international priorities of testing and implementing effective, earlier interventions, therefore investing in the improvement infant's health based on evidence, as a future investment for individuals and the community.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy
NCT05198921
Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Personalized Innovative Intervention Pathways to Promote EF in Children With CP
NCT06288971
Executive Functions in Cerebral Palsy
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Observational Study for the Epidemiology of Cerebral Palsy in Italy
NCT06813586
Cerebral Palsy
RECRUITING
Effect of Video Game-assisted and BoNT-A Injection Therapy on Spasticity, Activity and Participation in CP Patients
NCT04290169
Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
UNKNOWN
NA
CareToy Early Intervention in Infants at Risk for Cerebral Palsy
NCT03234959
Cerebral Palsy
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Rationale and purpose of research Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most frequent cause of motor disability worldwide, with a prevalence of 2-2.5 per 1000 live births. Several comorbidities characterize the clinical picture of children with CP, such as communication impairment, feeding difficulties, intellectual disability, vision and hearing impairment and epilepsy. Children with CP may experience a variety of difficulties with communication including speech, the development of gesture and facial expression, or receptive and expressive language, including voice production and intelligibility. Communication impairment has been identified in at least 40% of children with CP, with 36-90% of CP children experiencing motor speech impairment. Also, it has also been suggested that some children who do not present explicit dysarthria may have underlying speech motor control deficits. Intelligibility due to motor speech impairments affects activity and participation within various environments, reduces quality of life and increases daily care needs. Dysarthria may also be associated with excessive drooling and swallowing difficulties. Several studies consider compromised speech abilities as an indicator of the need for augmentative and alternative communication to supplement or replace communication. Conversely, CP and early acquired brain injury remain two of the most common medical causes of referral to speech and language therapy. However, little effort has been made in systematically improving speech motor abilities of children with CP by using early, reproducible and targeted intervention strategies. Furthermore, a poor relationship between the motor command and perceptual consequence of the speech movement has been hypothesized as a possible mechanism of speech dysfunction in CP, suggesting a potential therapeutic value of enhancing tactile-kinesthetic input to motor speech abilities of CP children.
2. Review of literature There are few papers reporting trials on targeted standardized intervention for speech motor deficit in infants or children with CP, with little evidences on treatment effectiveness. In a small group of children aged 3-11 years, it has been suggested that the effect of a speech motor treatment was aligned with the core principles of dynamic systems theory such as PROMPT (Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets) in changing speech motor patterns of children with CP with proven benefits in intelligibility, documented by kinematic analyses. Several types of CP were included (dyskinetic, spastic unilateral and bilateral). In a group of 7 children with spastic quadriplegia, some outcome of a motor speech treatment originally developed for adults with Parkinson disease were validated, the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD). They also showed changes in white matter integrity supporting behavioral changes.
3. Research questions/Hypothesis Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of intensive PROMPT treatment in a group of preschool children with CP and motor speech disorders (dysarthria/apraxia of speech).
Aim 2: To evaluate differences to the intervention response according to CP type, brain lesion severity and white matter integrity of corticospinal tract.
Primary Hypothesis: children with CP and motor speech disorders will benefit from 3 weeks of daily administration of PROMPT treatment and show measurable improvement of speech intelligibility on clinical and kinematic assessments, with 3 months stability.
Secondary hypotheses: children with dyskynetic CP will show more improvement induced by the PROMPT treatment as compared to children with spastic CP. Investigators also hypothesize that children with less severe brain lesions will have a higher level of improvement compared to children with more severe brain lesions. Investigators finally hypothesize that corticospinal microstructural integrity positively impact on intelligibility recovery, with children with better integrity having bigger improvements.
4. Method Investigators plan a randomized trial of PROMPT in children with CP using a wait-list control group. Eligible children will be randomized into either immediate treatment or wait-list-control groups. This design allows every child meeting inclusion criteria to eventually receive the treatment and avoids issues of equipoise. For CP wait-listed controls, the study continues for 3 weeks longer and results into an additional assessment.
Because PROMPT has been shown to be beneficial in several older children with CP, investigators' rational for the design allows for achievement of the RCT data collection and analysis, as well as allow all identified and consented children to receive the intervention.
The participants will include children between 3 and 9 years of age, with a diagnosis of CP and speech motor disorders. Parents will be asked to consent for the children for the participation in the study. All study activities will be carried out in our clinical center setting with a PROMPT trained therapist with appropriate knowledge of clinical research process.
In investigators' studies of rehabilitation with the CP population consent to participate in studies approaches 90%. From investigators' experience and clinical demographics of the center, they were expected 30 patients diagnosed CP with speech difficulties in the requisite age group per year, making possible a design of staggered enrollment of intervention and wait-list-control groups in the RCT. Recruitment will be completed according to the standards of research consent, followed by group randomization, by a team member other than the treating therapist. The assessments will be completed by an experiences SLP, different from the treating therapist.
2. Review of literature There are few papers reporting trials on targeted standardized intervention for speech motor deficit in infants or children with CP, with little evidences on treatment effectiveness. In a small group of children aged 3-11 years, it has been suggested that the effect of a speech motor treatment was aligned with the core principles of dynamic systems theory such as PROMPT (Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets) in changing speech motor patterns of children with CP with proven benefits in intelligibility, documented by kinematic analyses. Several types of CP were included (dyskinetic, spastic unilateral and bilateral). In a group of 7 children with spastic quadriplegia, some outcome of a motor speech treatment originally developed for adults with Parkinson disease were validated, the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD). They also showed changes in white matter integrity supporting behavioral changes.
3. Research questions/Hypothesis Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of intensive PROMPT treatment in a group of preschool children with CP and motor speech disorders (dysarthria/apraxia of speech).
Aim 2: To evaluate differences to the intervention response according to CP type, brain lesion severity and white matter integrity of corticospinal tract.
Primary Hypothesis: children with CP and motor speech disorders will benefit from 3 weeks of daily administration of PROMPT treatment and show measurable improvement of speech intelligibility on clinical and kinematic assessments, with 3 months stability.
Secondary hypotheses: children with dyskynetic CP will show more improvement induced by the PROMPT treatment as compared to children with spastic CP. Investigators also hypothesize that children with less severe brain lesions will have a higher level of improvement compared to children with more severe brain lesions. Investigators finally hypothesize that corticospinal microstructural integrity positively impact on intelligibility recovery, with children with better integrity having bigger improvements.
4. Method Investigators plan a randomized trial of PROMPT in children with CP using a wait-list control group. Eligible children will be randomized into either immediate treatment or wait-list-control groups. This design allows every child meeting inclusion criteria to eventually receive the treatment and avoids issues of equipoise. For CP wait-listed controls, the study continues for 3 weeks longer and results into an additional assessment.
Because PROMPT has been shown to be beneficial in several older children with CP, investigators' rational for the design allows for achievement of the RCT data collection and analysis, as well as allow all identified and consented children to receive the intervention.
The participants will include children between 3 and 9 years of age, with a diagnosis of CP and speech motor disorders. Parents will be asked to consent for the children for the participation in the study. All study activities will be carried out in our clinical center setting with a PROMPT trained therapist with appropriate knowledge of clinical research process.
In investigators' studies of rehabilitation with the CP population consent to participate in studies approaches 90%. From investigators' experience and clinical demographics of the center, they were expected 30 patients diagnosed CP with speech difficulties in the requisite age group per year, making possible a design of staggered enrollment of intervention and wait-list-control groups in the RCT. Recruitment will be completed according to the standards of research consent, followed by group randomization, by a team member other than the treating therapist. The assessments will be completed by an experiences SLP, different from the treating therapist.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Cerebral Palsy
Dysarthria
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
We plan a randomized trial using a wait-list control group.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PROMPT Treated
PROMPT treatment, twice a day, for 5 days a week, for 3 consecutive weeks
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
PROMPT
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
PROMPT treatment is consistent with the principles of motor learning, in that every session includes a blocked pre-practice followed by variable and distributed practice and a gradual, hierarchical increase of complexity. Speech motor goals are integrated in goals for language and functional communication. During a PROMPT session tactile-kinesthetic-proprioceptive inputs are consistently provided, in order to shape speech movements, to give information on sequencing and timing and to introduce constraints for the reduction of degrees of freedom at the articulators' level in favour of motor control.
Control
Usual treatment
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PROMPT
PROMPT treatment is consistent with the principles of motor learning, in that every session includes a blocked pre-practice followed by variable and distributed practice and a gradual, hierarchical increase of complexity. Speech motor goals are integrated in goals for language and functional communication. During a PROMPT session tactile-kinesthetic-proprioceptive inputs are consistently provided, in order to shape speech movements, to give information on sequencing and timing and to introduce constraints for the reduction of degrees of freedom at the articulators' level in favour of motor control.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
motor speech treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* child between 2 and 9 years with a diagnosis of CP, with normal to mild intellectual disability and adequate language comprehension skills
* motor speech deficit
* motor speech deficit
Exclusion Criteria
* utilization of AAC strategies as the only means of communication,
* medical fragility or anatomical malformations affecting speech production preventing the ability to participate in the intervention
* medical fragility or anatomical malformations affecting speech production preventing the ability to participate in the intervention
Minimum Eligible Age
2 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
9 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Simona Fiori
Principal Investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simona Fiori, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
Tirrenia, Tuscany, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Italy
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Whelan MA. Practice parameter: diagnostic assessment of the child with cerebral palsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2004 Nov 23;63(10):1985-6; author reply 1985-6. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barty E, Caynes K, Johnston LM. Development and reliability of the Functional Communication Classification System for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Oct;58(10):1036-41. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13124. Epub 2016 Apr 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Boliek CA, Fox CM. Therapeutic effects of intensive voice treatment (LSVT LOUD(R)) for children with spastic cerebral palsy and dysarthria: A phase I treatment validation study. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Dec;19(6):601-615. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2016.1221451. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bosanquet M, Copeland L, Ware R, Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 May;55(5):418-26. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12140.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chen CY, Liu CY, Su WC, Huang SL, Lin KM. Factors associated with the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders: a population-based longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119(2):e435-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1477.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cicchetti D. Neural plasticity, sensitive periods, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2015 May;27(2):319-20. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000012. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cockerill H, Elbourne D, Allen E, Scrutton D, Will E, McNee A, Fairhurst C, Baird G. Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: the SH&PE population study. Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Mar;40(2):149-57. doi: 10.1111/cch.12066. Epub 2013 May 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fiori S, Cioni G, Klingels K, Ortibus E, Van Gestel L, Rose S, Boyd RN, Feys H, Guzzetta A. Reliability of a novel, semi-quantitative scale for classification of structural brain magnetic resonance imaging in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Sep;56(9):839-45. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12457. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fiori S, Guzzetta A. Plasticity following early-life brain injury: Insights from quantitative MRI. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Mar;39(2):141-6. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.01.007.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hustad KC, Gorton K, Lee J. Classification of speech and language profiles in 4-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a prospective preliminary study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Dec;53(6):1496-513. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0176). Epub 2010 Jul 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kennes J, Rosenbaum P, Hanna SE, Walter S, Russell D, Raina P, Bartlett D, Galuppi B. Health status of school-aged children with cerebral palsy: information from a population-based sample. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Apr;44(4):240-7. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201002018.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Liegeois F, Tournier JD, Pigdon L, Connelly A, Morgan AT. Corticobulbar tract changes as predictors of dysarthria in childhood brain injury. Neurology. 2013 Mar 5;80(10):926-32. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182840c6d. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McLeod S, Harrison LJ, McCormack J. The intelligibility in Context Scale: validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):648-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130). Epub 2012 Jan 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, Mensah F, Pennington L, Morgan A. Language outcomes of children with cerebral palsy aged 5 years and 6 years: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jun;58(6):605-11. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12957. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nordberg A, Miniscalco C, Lohmander A, Himmelmann K. Speech problems affect more than one in two children with cerebral palsy: Swedish population-based study. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Feb;102(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/apa.12076. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Novak I. Evidence-based diagnosis, health care, and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1141-56. doi: 10.1177/0883073814535503. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, de Vries LS, Einspieler C, Fahey M, Fehlings D, Ferriero DM, Fetters L, Fiori S, Forssberg H, Gordon AM, Greaves S, Guzzetta A, Hadders-Algra M, Harbourne R, Kakooza-Mwesige A, Karlsson P, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Latal B, Loughran-Fowlds A, Maitre N, McIntyre S, Noritz G, Pennington L, Romeo DM, Shepherd R, Spittle AJ, Thornton M, Valentine J, Walker K, White R, Badawi N. Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Parkes J, Hill N, Platt MJ, Donnelly C. Oromotor dysfunction and communication impairments in children with cerebral palsy: a register study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Dec;52(12):1113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03765.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pennington L, Roelant E, Thompson V, Robson S, Steen N, Miller N. Intensive dysarthria therapy for younger children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 May;55(5):464-71. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12098. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pennington L, Parker NK, Kelly H, Miller N. Speech therapy for children with dysarthria acquired before three years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD006937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006937.pub3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ramig LO, Sapir S, Countryman S, Pawlas AA, O'Brien C, Hoehn M, Thompson LL. Intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for patients with Parkinson's disease: a 2 year follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;71(4):493-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.4.493.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Reed A, Cummine J, Bakhtiari R, Fox CM, Boliek CA. Changes in White Matter Integrity following Intensive Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD(R)) in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Motor Speech Disorders. Dev Neurosci. 2017;39(6):460-471. doi: 10.1159/000478724. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ward R, Strauss G, Leitao S. Kinematic changes in jaw and lip control of children with cerebral palsy following participation in a motor-speech (PROMPT) intervention. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Apr;15(2):136-55. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.713393. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ward R, Leitao S, Strauss G. An evaluation of the effectiveness of PROMPT therapy in improving speech production accuracy in six children with cerebral palsy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Aug;16(4):355-71. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.876662. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Watson RM, Pennington L. Assessment and management of the communication difficulties of children with cerebral palsy: a UK survey of SLT practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Mar-Apr;50(2):241-59. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12138. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fiori S, Ragoni C, Podda I, Chilosi A, Amador C, Cipriani P, Guzzetta A, Sgandurra G. PROMPT to improve speech motor abilities in children with cerebral palsy: a wait-list control group trial protocol. BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 6;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02771-6.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019 Motor Speech Grant
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PROMPT-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Speech and Arm Combined Exergame
NCT06817941
RECRUITING
NA
Changes in Motor and Cognitive Function on Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy, Associated With Videogame Therapy
NCT05557305
RECRUITING
NA
Does Reducing Spasticity Permit an Increase in Strength?
NCT00255073
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Motor Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT07034547
RECRUITING
NA
Role of Rebound Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
NCT04712708
UNKNOWN
NA
Relationship Between Communication and Gross Motor Function in Quadriparetic Cerebral Palsy
NCT06591689
COMPLETED
Robotic-assisted Therapy to Improve Manual Dexterity in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02923167
COMPLETED
NA
EARLY Intervention in Parent-professional Cooperation in Cerebral Palsy
NCT06180291
RECRUITING
NA
Noninvasive Spinal Neuromodulation Enables Locomotor Recovery in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy
NCT04882592
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
The Effect of Action Observation Therapy on Spasticity, Motor Function, and Balance in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT07247331
COMPLETED
Dopamine and Motor Learning in Cerebral Palsy
NCT02839733
TERMINATED
Use of Motor Rehabilitation Courses in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06051643
UNKNOWN
Motor Disability of Children With Cerebral Palsy Using Motor Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT02518867
UNKNOWN
NA
Movement Characterization in Spastic/Dystonic Cerebral Palsy Using Haptic Feedback in Virtual Reality
NCT03744884
UNKNOWN
NA
Exopulse Mollii Suit, Motor Functions & CP Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05885139
RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy of Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Rehabilitation Treatment of Patients With Cerebral Paralysis
NCT01929434
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Improving Stretching Interventions for Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02766491
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Derived Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cerebral Palsy
NCT03795974
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Quality of Life in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06288958
COMPLETED
Cerebrolysin Neural Repair Therapy in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Palsy
NCT02116348
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
MRI-based Neuroimaging Predictors of Clinical Improvements Following Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02979743
UNKNOWN
NA
The Best Intervention to Improve Gait Pattern in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
NCT06813599
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
The Effect of Dual Task on Manual Ability Performance in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06295419
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Lateral Cord Magnetic Stimulation For Refractory Spastic Cerebral Palsy
NCT03676439
RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
Task Oriented Activities Based on NDT Therapy Principles
NCT05903729
COMPLETED
NA