Deep Brain Stimulation Post Failed Vagal Nerve Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT04181229
Last Updated: 2024-03-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-25
2023-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Deep Brain Stimulation vs. Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Epileptic Spasms
NCT07010276
Pulvinar Stimulation in Epilepsy: a Pilot Study
NCT04692701
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric Epilepsy
NCT02004340
Electrical Brain Stimulation to Reduce Epileptic Seizures
NCT00344877
Study Comparing Best Medical Practice With or Without VNS Therapy in Pharmacoresistant Partial Epilepsy Patients
NCT00522418
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As a patient-preference randomized trial, patients and their parents will be introduced to the options of continuing with current VNS management (control arm) or trialing DBS (treatment arm). Patients and their parents will fall into three possible groups according to preference and willingness for randomization.
i) Patients with no strong preferences and consent to randomization ii) Patients with a preference, yet still consent to randomization iii) Patients who refuse randomization and opt for enrollment in a specific arm
Patients in the treatment arm will receive DBS of the centromedian nucleus. The centromedian nucleus is believed to reduce electrocortical activity in generalized epilepsy. The investigators hypothesize that stimulating this target will lead to a decrease in seizure severity and frequency in patients who have failed VNS; in comparison with patients who will have continued VNS treatment and optimization. Patients in the control arm will continue to be observed for 12 months with no change to their treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DBS Treatment
Patients in the treatment arm will receive DBS of bilateral centromedian nucleus (2 electrodes per patient). DBS is a standard of care treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy patients who have previously failed VNS at 12 months or more after instigation and optimization of therapy.
Deep brain stimulation
Patients will receive surgical implantation of the Medtronic DBS device (Device # 37601). Two (2) electrodes will be implanted bilaterally in the centromedian nucleus.
Continued VNS (control)
For the control arm, the patients will be monitored for one year with the same standard assessments used for the measurement of seizure frequency and severity. No changes will be made to these patients' treatment plan. These patients will be placed on a wait list for CM-DBS treatment of seizures if that is the desire of the patient and/or their family. After the 12 months of observation, these patients can choose to undergo DBS surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Deep brain stimulation
Patients will receive surgical implantation of the Medtronic DBS device (Device # 37601). Two (2) electrodes will be implanted bilaterally in the centromedian nucleus.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy with failure after trial of two anti-epileptic medications (as defined by Kwan et al. 20093). All children screened for entry into the study will be re-diagnosed by a neurologist prior to entry.
3. Failure of vagal nerve stimulation, defined as the same or increased frequency and severity of seizures at 12 months or more after instigation and optimization of therapy. Failure is defined objectively and subjectively. Objective evidence includes caregiver logs, clinician assessment, or neuromonitoring if the clinician has documented a baseline status prior to instigation of vagal nerve stimulation. Subjective measures include family or patient opinion that seizure frequency or severity has not improved.
4. Parents or legal guardians, including caregivers, who are informed and able to give written consent.
5. Ability to comply with all testing, follow-ups and study appointments and protocols for 12 months following the end of the duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any contraindication to MRI scanning. A preoperative MRI scan is essential to planning DBS and therefore any contraindication to MRI is a contraindication to enrollment in the study.
3. Unwillingness or inability to return to SickKids for follow-up visits.
8 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Justine's Hospital
OTHER
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
George Ibrahim
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George Ibrahim
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB1000063803
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.