PRediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation EfficaCy In Drug-reSistant Epilepsy
NCT ID: NCT04935567
Last Updated: 2021-06-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Comparing Best Medical Practice With or Without VNS Therapy in Pharmacoresistant Partial Epilepsy Patients
NCT00522418
Optimization of the Parameters of Vagal Nerve Stimulation
NCT04693221
Assessment of Effect of Vagal Nerve Stimulator (VNS) on Electrocorticograms Recorded by Responsive Neurostimulator (RNS) in Patients With Drug Resistant Epilepsy
NCT03595072
Localizing the Epileptogenic Zone With High Resolution Electroencephalography
NCT01090934
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Clinical Outcomes Measured Prospectively in Patients Stimulated
NCT01281293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The VNS will be indicated in a given patient based on a clinical decision as a standard of patient´s therapy (i.e., the indication of VNS is not a part of the proposed project). The patient will be informed about the study on a pre-implantation visit or by a phone call, during which initial eligibility for the study will be determined, and study protocol and design will be explained by research staff.
G. Assessment 0 - pre-implantation assessment Assessment 0 includes screening for eligibility criteria and obtaining baseline data on subjects participating in the study. After the signature of informed consent, the patient will be given a unique code by which all data will be labelled. The demographic information, health history, including psychiatric disease and type of epilepsy, concomitant medication (AEDs and other drugs), and seizure frequency will be collected. The seizure frequency will be analysed based on the patient diary. Standard EEG will be recorded according to the protocol described below.
Protocol for EEG recording The EEG will be recorded on the EEG recording system with a sampling frequency of 250 Hz or higher, with electrodes placed on the scalp according to 10-20 system (electrodes names as follows: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, and O2). Different electrodes names are allowed, but their position must correspond with the position of previously defined electrodes. Additional electrodes are also allowed, but will not be evaluated within the study. EEGs with lower numbers or different positions of electrodes are not allowed.
The EEG is recorded in a supine position with eyes closed except for periods with eyes opening. The recorded EEG will have a duration of 20 minutes or more and must contain defined segments in the following order (Figure 1):
Segment 1 - Rest 1 - duration at least 2 min Segment 2 - Eyes opening/closing - duration at least 10 s Segment 3 - Rest 2 - duration at least 10 s; immediately after eye closure Segment 4 - Photic stimulation - stimulation frequencies: 5 Hz (10 s) - 10 Hz (10 s) - 15 Hz (10s) - 20 Hz (10 s) - 25 Hz (10 s) - 30 Hz (10 s) - 25 Hz (5 s) - 20 Hz (5 s) - 15 Hz (5 s) - 10 Hz (5 s) - 5 Hz (5 s); light intensity at least 0.7 Joule Segment 5 - Hyperventilation - duration at least 4 min (2 minutes hyperventilation by nose + 2 minutes hyperventilation by mouth) Segment 6 - Eyes opening/closing - duration at least 10 s Segment 7 - Rest 3 - duration at least 10 s, immediately after eye closure Segment 8 - Rest 4 - duration at least 2 minutes The recorded EEG will be anonymized and labelled by a unique code previously attributed to a patient. In the next step, the EEG will be sent for mathematical/statistical processing. Based on this processing, the patients´ predicted response to VNS will be determined in terms of predicted responders (seizure reduction ≥ 50%) vs. predicted non-responders (seizure reduction \< 50%). Neither the patient nor the physician will be informed about the classification results.
Follow-up assessments - Assessments 1, 2 Two assessments are designed in patients´ follow-up: Assessment 1 - 1 year after stimulation initialization and Assessment 2 - 2 years after stimulation initialization.
Assessment 1, 2 The patients will be evaluated 1 and 2 years after stimulation initialization. The patient will be asked about changes in health history, including psychiatric disease, concomitant medication (AEDs and other drugs), VNS parameters setting, and seizure frequency. The seizure frequency will be collected by reviewing patients 'diary. The reported seizure frequency will be compared with pre-implantation seizure frequency, and real-life response will be calculated in terms of real-life responders (seizure reduction ≥ 50%) or real-life non-responder (seizure reduction \< 50%). If the patient does not tolerate at least the minimal VNS setting (0.75 mA) because of serious adverse events, he/she will be excluded from further analysis (the patient´s data will be reported separately).
The information collected in Assessment 1 and 2, including real-life response to VNS, will be labelled by the patient´s unique code and will be sent to the coordinating centre, where it will be compared with the patient´s predicted response.
At the end of Assessment 2, the patient will be asked if he/she is interested in the predicted response to VNS. If yes, the study physician will contact the coordinating centre, where the predicted response for a given patient will be conveyed. The patient will be informed about the predicted response by a phone call or during a regular visit (not a part of the study protocol, described below).
The study is concerned with the verification of the real-life validity of our statistic classifier for the prediction of VNS response based on pre-implantation EEG. The patients based on the pre-implantation EEG will be classified based on their predicted response as predicted responders (≥50% seizure reduction) vs. predicted non-responders (\<50% seizure reduction). In Assessment 1 a 2, respectively, the patients´ real-life response will be determined: real-life responders (≥50% seizure reduction) vs. real-life non-responder (\< 50% seizure-reduction). The predicted and real-life responses will be statistically compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
The individual patients´ groups (predicted responders vs. predicted non-responders, real-life responders vs. real-life non-responders) will be compared based on their demographic data, health history, AEDs, and VNS parameter. A suitable statistical test will be chosen concerning the data´s characteristics (Pearson´s Chi-squared test for categorical variables, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Predicted responders
Patients indicated VNS therapy as their standard for clinical care and are concerned about the prediction of VNS efficacy based on pre-implantation EEG, (≥50% seizure reduction).
Statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy
statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy based on a mathematical and statistical analysis of scalp EEG data
Predicted non-responders
Patients indicated VNS therapy as their standard for clinical care and are concerned about the prediction of VNS efficacy based on pre-implantation EEG, (\<50% seizure reduction).
Statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy
statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy based on a mathematical and statistical analysis of scalp EEG data
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy
statistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy based on a mathematical and statistical analysis of scalp EEG data
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Drug-resistant epilepsy is defined as a failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately chosen, and used antiepileptic drug schedules (whether as monotherapy or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom (Kwan et al., 2010).
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Availability to record 20 minutes of EEG with photic stimulation, hyperventilation, and eye-opening/closing according to the pre-defined protocol.
* Availability of seizure diaries at least three months before VNS implantation OR reliable information about seizure frequency at least three months before VNS implantation
* The ability of a patient/family member/caregiver to record seizures precisely into seizure diaries OR the ability of a patient/family member/caregiver to report seizures precisely different ways.
* In cases with very high seizure frequency (several seizures per day), it is acceptable to report only the days without any seizures.
Exclusion Criteria
* The presence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures which cannot be reliably distinguished from epileptic seizures by a patient/family member/caregiver.
* The presence of other condition which can resemble epileptic seizures which cannot be reliably distinguished from epileptic seizures by a patient/family member/caregiver.
* Metabolic condition or other diseases, in which the increase of seizure frequency is expectable.
* The inability of a patient to take regular visits which are required for VNS parameters settings or the study
* Life expectancy shorter than two years
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
OTHER
University Hospital, Motol
OTHER
Na Homolce Hospital
OTHER
Masaryk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Milan Brazdil, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital st. Anne´s Brno
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital St. Anne´s Brno
Brno, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dolezalova I, Koritakova E, Souckova L, Chrastina J, Chladek J, Stepanova R, Brazdil M. Prediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation Efficacy in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (PRECISE): Prospective Study for Pre-implantation Prediction/Study Design. Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 21;13:839163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839163. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRECISE-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.