Genital Nerve Stimulation - GNS - for Treatment of Non-neurogenic OAB
NCT ID: NCT04160793
Last Updated: 2019-11-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-01
2020-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
NeuroGyn Genital Neuromodulation System for iOAB Treatment
NCT06529198
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05626816
Comparison of Sacral Nerve Modulation and Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01069016
Efficacy Study of Pudendal Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
NCT01023269
The Effect of Dorsal Genital Nerve Stimulation on Opening Urethral Pressure
NCT05804552
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In pelvic dysfunctions, sacral nerve stimulation was the first technique for pelvic nerves stimulation that typically involves electrical stimulation of the nerve via a dorsal transformational technique of implantation. SNS evolved as a widely used treatment for OAB but does not completely resolve symptoms in the majority of patients. Because PNS reach more "sphincter-vesico-anal" fibers than SNM, PNS has been proposed for patients who have failed to respond to sacral neuromodulation. The good effects of PNS in neurogenic and in some non-neurogenic disorders. However, the implantation of a lead to the PN is not easily accomplished and the risk for lead migration with implantation below the pelvic floor is increased. So there is definitively a need for a more suitable alternative for selective stimulation within the pelvic cavity, a method that cannot only be reserved for experts in this field but for all gynecologists dealing with patients suffering from functional disorders of the bladder in daily clinical practice. The stimulation of the dorsal nerve of the pe-nis/clitoris - GNS - emerges as a very attractive alternative that might result in great outcomes for controlling urinary and fecal disorders.
Because part of the DNP lies superficially to the skin outside the pelvis, this nerve can be stimulated using surface electrodes attached to the overlying skin of the penis or close to the clitoris. This application is however limited, due to intolerance to required high stimulation amplitude. Surface electrodes have limitations such as difficulties in proper daily placement and issues related to hygiene as well as a lack of acceptance in some patients. Implanted electrodes are more suitable. However, implanted electrodes in the penis or near the clitoris, must endure the mechanical stress of penile erections and external pressure, carrying the risk of the cable/electrode breaking or being dislocated.
The GNS consists of a two-step procedure with a preoperative non-surgical test-phase and a final surgical implantation of the neuroprothesis. In contrast to the classical technique of transcutaneous lead electrode implantation for sacral or pudendal nerve stimulation, the GNS-test-phase does not require any interventional procedure: because the genital nerves are located just few millimeter below the skin, test-stimulation can be achieved using skin surface or needle electrodes. Stimulation is achieved using a battery powered hand-held stimulator . The effect of the stimulation can be tested by the patient in their daily, home and professional environment, or at the practice under urodynamic testing, or if required other electro-physiological testing. After confirmation of the effectiveness of GNS, implantation of a permanent neuroprothesis can be planned. The procedure is performed either under general or spinal anesthesia or using only local anesthesia with IV-sedation as in the classical tension-free vaginal tape procedure (TVT). Because the GNS does not require two surgical procedures for both the test- and the final-implantation but rather only one for the final implantation, the presented protocol allows considerable cost reduction in comparison to the usual procedures for sacral or pudendal nerve stimulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Genital Nerve Stimulation
Stimulation of the DNP
Genital Nerve Stimulation
Implantation the vaginal way a stimulation's electrode to the dorsal nerve of the clintoris in local anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Genital Nerve Stimulation
Implantation the vaginal way a stimulation's electrode to the dorsal nerve of the clintoris in local anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* suffering form intractable iOAB
* proved iOAB by urodynamic testing
* non pregnant
* good health
* patients demanding for therapy of iOAB and willing taking part to the study
* \>6-9 months from last therapy with botulinum toxine A
Exclusion Criteria
* patients affected by a neurogenic condition
* any health condition being a contraindication for the procedure
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. med. Marc Possover
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. med. Marc Possover
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Possover, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PIMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Possover
Zurich, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Farag FF, Martens FM, Rijkhoff NJ, Heesakkers JP. Dorsal genital nerve stimulation in patients with detrusor overactivity: a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Oct;13(5):385-8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0273-x.
Martens FM, Heesakkers JP, Rijkhoff NJ. Surgical access for electrical stimulation of the pudendal and dorsal genital nerves in the overactive bladder: a review. J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):798-804. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2696. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GNS1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.