Quality of Life and Psychology of Donors After Hepatectomy

NCT ID: NCT04150185

Last Updated: 2019-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-15

Study Completion Date

2018-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Liver donation by a living donor is major surgery and has a profound effect on health-related quality of life and psychology. This study aims at evaluating those aspects of a donor for a period of five years after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has established itself as a treatment for end-stage liver disease but donor safety remains a major issue. It is the responsibility of the transplant team to restore donor's health, not only physical, but also mental, social and environmental. There is scarcity of long term longitudinal data on donor quality of life. Most of the studies are cross sectional which describe the quality of life at certain time point and do not take into account of changes that might occur over a period. It is more relevant in this scenario, as two persons from a family undergo surgery at the same time, which has a profound effect on family dynamics, and restoration towards normalcy goes hand in hand with adaptation to a new lifestyle. Another shortcoming of available literature is lack of uniform instruments which comprehensively measure the quality of life of live liver donors (LLDs). Standardized health related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments such as Short Form 36(SF 36) or World Health Organization quality of life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) are not designed for LLDs. Moreover, there are several symptoms which might interfere with daily activities such as incision site problems , dyspepsia to name a few, but are not distressing enough to be reflected on quality of life scores .The aim of current study was to observe the attitude of donors pre transplant, quality of life over a period, satisfaction with the donation process, their assessment of the health care team, satisfaction with the consent process, and change in pattern of symptoms and cosmesis after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

live liver donors

Live liver donors undergoing donor hepatectomy

Donor hepatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Donor hepatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- All patients undergoing donor hepatectomy from March 2012 to August 2013

Exclusion Criteria

\- Refusal to participate in study
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Piyush Kumar Sinha

Assistant Professor Liver Transplant Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piyush K Sinha, MS, MCh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor, liver transplant surgery

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

f25/5/15/AC/ILBS/2011/213

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.