Determination of Postprandial Glycemic Responses by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in a Real-World Setting

NCT ID: NCT04147273

Last Updated: 2023-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose using capillary glucose testing has a number of shortcomings compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We aimed to compare these two methods and used blood glucose measurements in venous blood as a reference. Despite considerable inter-individual variability of postprandial glycemic responses, CGM evaluated postprandial glycemic excursions which had comparable results compared to standard blood glucose measurements under real-life conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose using capillary glucose testing (C) has a number of shortcomings compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We aimed to compare these two methods and used blood glucose measurements in venous blood (IV) as a reference. Postprandial blood glucose levels were measured after 50 g oral glucose load and after the consumption of a portion of different foods containing 50 g of carbohydrates. We also evaluated the associations between postprandial glucose responses and the clinical characteristics of the participants at the beginning of the study. Incremental area under the curve (AUCi) of postprandial blood glucose was calculated for 1 h (AUCi 0-60) and 2 h (AUCi 0-120). Despite considerable inter-individual variability of postprandial glycemic responses, CGM evaluated postprandial glycemic excursions which had comparable results compared to standard blood glucose measurements under real-life conditions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postprandial Glucose Response Glycaemic Index Continous Glucose Measurement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evaluation of CGM compared with standard measurements

Two products were studied: white bread (Butter Toast®, Golden Toast, Wittenberg, Germany) and whole grain bread (1688 Mehrkorn®, Harry-Brot, Schenefeld, Germany). One portion (containing 50 g digestible carbohydrates) was eaten immediately before the beginning of the test in the morning after an overnight fast of at least 10 h. Before testing, participants ate as usual on the previous day without a standard meal and refrained from consuming alcohol and exercising for 72 h. A 200-ml glucose drink (Accu-Chek Dextrose O.G.-T. Saft®, Roche Diabetes Care, Mannheim, Germany), containing also 50 g of carbohydrates, was used as the reference product.

Group Type OTHER

Determination of postprandial glucose response by continuous glucose measurement after consuming different carbohydrate containing foods

Intervention Type DEVICE

One day prior to the study beginning, participants were equipped with a CGM system (FreeStyle Libre®, Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA). This CGM system provides glucose recordings every 15 min over a period of 14 days. The glucose data were downloaded manually by a scan with a handheld device.

On the second day of the study, participants consumed portions of these three test products containing 50 g of available carbohydrate on 3 separate days without a washout period. The products were tested in random order at the same time of the morning after a 10 h overnight fast. Venous blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min postprandial by inserting an intravenous cannula into a forearm vein. Capillary blood samples were obtained through finger pricking. Blood glucose levels in these samples were measured with a high quality SMBG system (ContourXT/Contour next, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Leverkusen, Deutschland, Germany).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Determination of postprandial glucose response by continuous glucose measurement after consuming different carbohydrate containing foods

One day prior to the study beginning, participants were equipped with a CGM system (FreeStyle Libre®, Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA). This CGM system provides glucose recordings every 15 min over a period of 14 days. The glucose data were downloaded manually by a scan with a handheld device.

On the second day of the study, participants consumed portions of these three test products containing 50 g of available carbohydrate on 3 separate days without a washout period. The products were tested in random order at the same time of the morning after a 10 h overnight fast. Venous blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min postprandial by inserting an intravenous cannula into a forearm vein. Capillary blood samples were obtained through finger pricking. Blood glucose levels in these samples were measured with a high quality SMBG system (ContourXT/Contour next, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Leverkusen, Deutschland, Germany).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-80 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* acute diseases, severe illness with in-patient treatment during the last 3 months, weight change \>2 kg/week during the last month, smoking secession during the last 3 months, drugs for active weight reduction, chronic medication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bionorica SE

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

West German Center of Diabetes and Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephan Martin

Director of the West German Center of Diabetes and Health, Head of Diabetology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West-German Center of Diabetes and Health

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RT-CGM in Young Adults at Risk of DKA
NCT04039763 RECRUITING NA